{"title":"商品市场下滑:左尾事件中的系统风险和溢出效应","authors":"Samet Gunay , Destan Kirimhan , Emrah Ismail Cevik","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate systemic risk and spillovers in the commodity network during left-tail events using state-of-the-art methodologies: the Component Exponent Shortfall (CES), Quantile-Vector Autoregression (QVAR) and Causality-in-Risk. Our analysis focuses on five commodity groups: Energy (Crude Oil, Heating Oil, Natural Gas, Coal), Base Metals (Aluminum, Copper, Nickel, Zinc), Ferrous Metals (Iron, Steel), Precious Metals (Gold, Palladium, Platinum, Silver), and Others (Rubber). Across the models utilized, we consistently find that energy commodities and precious metals, along with copper as a standalone commodity, represent the most systemically risky group. Thus, portfolios incorporating these commodities are advised to implement more careful diversification to mitigate risks stemming from systemic factors. This may require additional attention to precious metals, as they are often considered safe-haven assets. Expediting the implementation of regulations that promote the replacement of fossil energy sources with green alternatives could be instrumental in managing systemic risk in the commodity market while also facilitating global sustainability. Finally, the results show that the impact of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on both systemic risk and spillovers has been limited compared to the effects of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commodity market downturn: Systemic risk and spillovers during left tail events\",\"authors\":\"Samet Gunay , Destan Kirimhan , Emrah Ismail Cevik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigate systemic risk and spillovers in the commodity network during left-tail events using state-of-the-art methodologies: the Component Exponent Shortfall (CES), Quantile-Vector Autoregression (QVAR) and Causality-in-Risk. Our analysis focuses on five commodity groups: Energy (Crude Oil, Heating Oil, Natural Gas, Coal), Base Metals (Aluminum, Copper, Nickel, Zinc), Ferrous Metals (Iron, Steel), Precious Metals (Gold, Palladium, Platinum, Silver), and Others (Rubber). Across the models utilized, we consistently find that energy commodities and precious metals, along with copper as a standalone commodity, represent the most systemically risky group. Thus, portfolios incorporating these commodities are advised to implement more careful diversification to mitigate risks stemming from systemic factors. This may require additional attention to precious metals, as they are often considered safe-haven assets. Expediting the implementation of regulations that promote the replacement of fossil energy sources with green alternatives could be instrumental in managing systemic risk in the commodity market while also facilitating global sustainability. Finally, the results show that the impact of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on both systemic risk and spillovers has been limited compared to the effects of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Commodity market downturn: Systemic risk and spillovers during left tail events
We investigate systemic risk and spillovers in the commodity network during left-tail events using state-of-the-art methodologies: the Component Exponent Shortfall (CES), Quantile-Vector Autoregression (QVAR) and Causality-in-Risk. Our analysis focuses on five commodity groups: Energy (Crude Oil, Heating Oil, Natural Gas, Coal), Base Metals (Aluminum, Copper, Nickel, Zinc), Ferrous Metals (Iron, Steel), Precious Metals (Gold, Palladium, Platinum, Silver), and Others (Rubber). Across the models utilized, we consistently find that energy commodities and precious metals, along with copper as a standalone commodity, represent the most systemically risky group. Thus, portfolios incorporating these commodities are advised to implement more careful diversification to mitigate risks stemming from systemic factors. This may require additional attention to precious metals, as they are often considered safe-haven assets. Expediting the implementation of regulations that promote the replacement of fossil energy sources with green alternatives could be instrumental in managing systemic risk in the commodity market while also facilitating global sustainability. Finally, the results show that the impact of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on both systemic risk and spillovers has been limited compared to the effects of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.