利用虚拟现实中的眼动跟踪技术进行认知功能测试,有助于区分正常认知、MCI 和轻度痴呆症

Katsuyoshi Mizukami , Masatomo Taguchi , Takashi Kouketsu , Naoki Sato , Yoshiro Tanaka , Masahiko Iwakiri , Yoichiro Nishina , Yuan Ma , Iakov Chernyak , Shintaro Karaki
{"title":"利用虚拟现实中的眼动跟踪技术进行认知功能测试,有助于区分正常认知、MCI 和轻度痴呆症","authors":"Katsuyoshi Mizukami ,&nbsp;Masatomo Taguchi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kouketsu ,&nbsp;Naoki Sato ,&nbsp;Yoshiro Tanaka ,&nbsp;Masahiko Iwakiri ,&nbsp;Yoichiro Nishina ,&nbsp;Yuan Ma ,&nbsp;Iakov Chernyak ,&nbsp;Shintaro Karaki","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to verify the usability of our newly developed virtual reality-based cognitive function examination (VR-E) to differentiate mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition and mild dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The subjects of analysis were 71 people (26 males and 45 females, aged from 59 to 94), including 31 with normal cognitive function, 26 with MCI, and 14 with mild dementia, according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). The total score and each cognitive domain (memory, judgement, spatial cognition, calculation, language function) score of VR-E were compared among CDR0, CDR0.5 and CDR1. In addition, for CDR0 vs. CDR0.5 and CDR 0.5 vs. 1, the areas under the curve (ROC) were examined using the total score and each cognitive domain of VR-E.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences between the three CDR groups in the VR-E scores as well as each VR-E cognitive domain score. The ROC analysis with an AUC value for the VR-E scores between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.71, and between CDR 0.5 and 1 was 0.92. For each VR-E cognitive domain, the ROC analysis with an AUC value between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.63 for memory, 0.79 for judgment, 0.70 for spatial cognition, 0.62 for calculation, and 0.57 for language. Between CDR 0.5 and 1, the AUC values were 0.81 for memory, 0.75 for judgment, 0.82 for spatial cognition, 0.88 for calculation, and 0.86 for language.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results suggest that VR-E is useful for differentiating mild cognitive impairment from normal cognition and early dementia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cognitive function test utilizing eye-tracking technology in virtual reality is useful to distinguish between normal cognition, MCI and mild dementia\",\"authors\":\"Katsuyoshi Mizukami ,&nbsp;Masatomo Taguchi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kouketsu ,&nbsp;Naoki Sato ,&nbsp;Yoshiro Tanaka ,&nbsp;Masahiko Iwakiri ,&nbsp;Yoichiro Nishina ,&nbsp;Yuan Ma ,&nbsp;Iakov Chernyak ,&nbsp;Shintaro Karaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to verify the usability of our newly developed virtual reality-based cognitive function examination (VR-E) to differentiate mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition and mild dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The subjects of analysis were 71 people (26 males and 45 females, aged from 59 to 94), including 31 with normal cognitive function, 26 with MCI, and 14 with mild dementia, according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). The total score and each cognitive domain (memory, judgement, spatial cognition, calculation, language function) score of VR-E were compared among CDR0, CDR0.5 and CDR1. In addition, for CDR0 vs. CDR0.5 and CDR 0.5 vs. 1, the areas under the curve (ROC) were examined using the total score and each cognitive domain of VR-E.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences between the three CDR groups in the VR-E scores as well as each VR-E cognitive domain score. The ROC analysis with an AUC value for the VR-E scores between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.71, and between CDR 0.5 and 1 was 0.92. For each VR-E cognitive domain, the ROC analysis with an AUC value between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.63 for memory, 0.79 for judgment, 0.70 for spatial cognition, 0.62 for calculation, and 0.57 for language. Between CDR 0.5 and 1, the AUC values were 0.81 for memory, 0.75 for judgment, 0.82 for spatial cognition, 0.88 for calculation, and 0.86 for language.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results suggest that VR-E is useful for differentiating mild cognitive impairment from normal cognition and early dementia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在验证我们新开发的基于虚拟现实的认知功能检查(VR-E)在区分轻度认知障碍(MCI)与正常认知和轻度痴呆方面的可用性。方法 分析对象为 71 人(男 26 人,女 45 人,年龄在 59 至 94 岁之间),其中根据临床痴呆评级(CDR),正常认知功能 31 人,MCI 26 人,轻度痴呆 14 人。在 CDR0、CDR0.5 和 CDR1 之间比较了 VR-E 的总分和每个认知领域(记忆、判断、空间认知、计算、语言功能)的得分。此外,对于 CDR0 与 CDR0.5、CDR0.5 与 CDR1,使用 VR-E 的总分和每个认知域对曲线下面积(ROC)进行了检验。根据 ROC 分析,CDR 0 和 0.5 之间的 VR-E 分数的 AUC 值为 0.71,CDR 0.5 和 1 之间的 AUC 值为 0.92。在每个 VR-E 认知领域,CDR 0 和 0.5 之间的 ROC 分析 AUC 值分别为:记忆 0.63、判断 0.79、空间认知 0.70、计算 0.62 和语言 0.57。在 CDR 0.5 和 1 之间,记忆的 AUC 值为 0.81,判断为 0.75,空间认知为 0.82,计算为 0.88,语言为 0.86。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cognitive function test utilizing eye-tracking technology in virtual reality is useful to distinguish between normal cognition, MCI and mild dementia

Aim

This study aimed to verify the usability of our newly developed virtual reality-based cognitive function examination (VR-E) to differentiate mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition and mild dementia.

Method

The subjects of analysis were 71 people (26 males and 45 females, aged from 59 to 94), including 31 with normal cognitive function, 26 with MCI, and 14 with mild dementia, according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). The total score and each cognitive domain (memory, judgement, spatial cognition, calculation, language function) score of VR-E were compared among CDR0, CDR0.5 and CDR1. In addition, for CDR0 vs. CDR0.5 and CDR 0.5 vs. 1, the areas under the curve (ROC) were examined using the total score and each cognitive domain of VR-E.

Results

There were significant differences between the three CDR groups in the VR-E scores as well as each VR-E cognitive domain score. The ROC analysis with an AUC value for the VR-E scores between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.71, and between CDR 0.5 and 1 was 0.92. For each VR-E cognitive domain, the ROC analysis with an AUC value between CDR 0 and 0.5 was 0.63 for memory, 0.79 for judgment, 0.70 for spatial cognition, 0.62 for calculation, and 0.57 for language. Between CDR 0.5 and 1, the AUC values were 0.81 for memory, 0.75 for judgment, 0.82 for spatial cognition, 0.88 for calculation, and 0.86 for language.

Conclusion

The results suggest that VR-E is useful for differentiating mild cognitive impairment from normal cognition and early dementia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“There's a lot of factors”: Researcher reflections on using I-poetry to empathetically understand vaccine hesitant individuals The link between periodontitis and Alzheimer's disease – Brunei context Spirituality, forgiveness and self-esteem throughout adulthood in France The state of lipid metabolism in patients with diabetic nephropathy Association between atrial fibrillation and periodontal disease: A bioinformatics analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1