成人重症监护病房的血液保留技术普及率:多中心调查研究

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2024.07.002
M. Raurell-Torredà , R.-J. Fernández-Castillo , M.-E. Rodríguez-Delgado , Á. Cobos-Vargas , D.-M. Achury-Saldaña , E. Cavallo , A. Muriel-García , S. Arias-Rivera
{"title":"成人重症监护病房的血液保留技术普及率:多中心调查研究","authors":"M. Raurell-Torredà ,&nbsp;R.-J. Fernández-Castillo ,&nbsp;M.-E. Rodríguez-Delgado ,&nbsp;Á. Cobos-Vargas ,&nbsp;D.-M. Achury-Saldaña ,&nbsp;E. Cavallo ,&nbsp;A. Muriel-García ,&nbsp;S. Arias-Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anaemia is a common condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is also well known that a significant amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing, and the manufacture, storage, and distribution of blood components. To mitigate this, prevention strategies such as blood-sparing techniques are available. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of such techniques in ICUs in Spain and Latin America, healthcare systems with very different health expenditures per capita. The aim is to assess the degree of implementation of blood-sparing techniques in these regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional online multicentre survey. 251 ICUs in Spain and 53 in Latin America (20 in Argentina, 20 in Colombia, 13 in Ecuador) participated. A 20-item survey on the use of point-of-care, small-volume tubes (SVT), and closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD) was validated. Effect sizes were calculated using Phi (φ) or Cramer’s V (V).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A response rate of 77% was obtained for Spain and 96% for Latin America. In Spain, the majority of ICUs were affiliated with public hospitals (88.1%, 171/194) while in Latin America, most were associated with private hospitals (56.9%, 29/51). Regarding the use of point-of-care testing, 67.5% of Spanish ICUs, compared to 35.3% of Latin Americans, reported frequent use (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.343). In 91.7% of Spanish ICUs and 58.9% of Latin Americans, SVTs were rarely or never used (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.380). The use of CBSD was significantly lower in Spain for both arterial and central venous catheters (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.336). Private hospitals used more CBSD in arterial catheter than public ones (27% vs 8.3%, <em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.278).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Point-of-care testing can be improved in Latin America, while the use of CBSD and small-volume tubes can be enhanced in Spain. Private hospitals tend to implement blood-sparing techniques more effectively than public hospitals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 340-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood-sparing techniques prevalence in adult intensive care units: A multicentre survey study\",\"authors\":\"M. Raurell-Torredà ,&nbsp;R.-J. Fernández-Castillo ,&nbsp;M.-E. Rodríguez-Delgado ,&nbsp;Á. Cobos-Vargas ,&nbsp;D.-M. Achury-Saldaña ,&nbsp;E. Cavallo ,&nbsp;A. Muriel-García ,&nbsp;S. Arias-Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anaemia is a common condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is also well known that a significant amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing, and the manufacture, storage, and distribution of blood components. To mitigate this, prevention strategies such as blood-sparing techniques are available. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of such techniques in ICUs in Spain and Latin America, healthcare systems with very different health expenditures per capita. The aim is to assess the degree of implementation of blood-sparing techniques in these regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional online multicentre survey. 251 ICUs in Spain and 53 in Latin America (20 in Argentina, 20 in Colombia, 13 in Ecuador) participated. A 20-item survey on the use of point-of-care, small-volume tubes (SVT), and closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD) was validated. Effect sizes were calculated using Phi (φ) or Cramer’s V (V).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A response rate of 77% was obtained for Spain and 96% for Latin America. In Spain, the majority of ICUs were affiliated with public hospitals (88.1%, 171/194) while in Latin America, most were associated with private hospitals (56.9%, 29/51). Regarding the use of point-of-care testing, 67.5% of Spanish ICUs, compared to 35.3% of Latin Americans, reported frequent use (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.343). In 91.7% of Spanish ICUs and 58.9% of Latin Americans, SVTs were rarely or never used (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.380). The use of CBSD was significantly lower in Spain for both arterial and central venous catheters (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.336). Private hospitals used more CBSD in arterial catheter than public ones (27% vs 8.3%, <em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.278).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Point-of-care testing can be improved in Latin America, while the use of CBSD and small-volume tubes can be enhanced in Spain. Private hospitals tend to implement blood-sparing techniques more effectively than public hospitals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 340-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 贫血是重症监护病房(ICU)病人的常见病。众所周知,医疗服务中产生的大量二氧化碳很可能来自献血、检验以及血液成分的制造、储存和分配。为了减少二氧化碳的产生,可以采取一些预防策略,如节约血液的技术。西班牙和拉美地区的人均医疗支出大相径庭,因此对这些地区重症监护室使用此类技术的情况缺乏了解。我们的目的是评估这些地区实施节约用血技术的程度。西班牙的 251 家重症监护室和拉丁美洲的 53 家重症监护室(阿根廷 20 家、哥伦比亚 20 家、厄瓜多尔 13 家)参加了调查。对使用护理点、小容量管(SVT)和闭合血液采样装置(CBSD)的情况进行了 20 个项目的调查验证。结果 西班牙的回复率为 77%,拉丁美洲为 96%。在西班牙,大多数重症监护室隶属于公立医院(88.1%,171/194),而在拉丁美洲,大多数重症监护室隶属于私立医院(56.9%,29/51)。在使用床旁检测方面,67.5% 的西班牙重症监护室报告经常使用床旁检测(V = 0.343),而拉美只有 35.3%。91.7%的西班牙 ICU 和 58.9%的拉丁美洲 ICU 很少或从未使用 SVT(V = 0.380)。在西班牙,动脉导管和中心静脉导管的 CBSD 使用率明显较低(V = 0.336)。私立医院在动脉导管中使用 CBSD 的比例高于公立医院(27% vs 8.3%,V = 0.278)。与公立医院相比,私立医院往往能更有效地实施节血技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood-sparing techniques prevalence in adult intensive care units: A multicentre survey study

Introduction

Anaemia is a common condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is also well known that a significant amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing, and the manufacture, storage, and distribution of blood components. To mitigate this, prevention strategies such as blood-sparing techniques are available. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of such techniques in ICUs in Spain and Latin America, healthcare systems with very different health expenditures per capita. The aim is to assess the degree of implementation of blood-sparing techniques in these regions.

Methods

Cross-sectional online multicentre survey. 251 ICUs in Spain and 53 in Latin America (20 in Argentina, 20 in Colombia, 13 in Ecuador) participated. A 20-item survey on the use of point-of-care, small-volume tubes (SVT), and closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD) was validated. Effect sizes were calculated using Phi (φ) or Cramer’s V (V).

Results

A response rate of 77% was obtained for Spain and 96% for Latin America. In Spain, the majority of ICUs were affiliated with public hospitals (88.1%, 171/194) while in Latin America, most were associated with private hospitals (56.9%, 29/51). Regarding the use of point-of-care testing, 67.5% of Spanish ICUs, compared to 35.3% of Latin Americans, reported frequent use (V = 0.343). In 91.7% of Spanish ICUs and 58.9% of Latin Americans, SVTs were rarely or never used (V = 0.380). The use of CBSD was significantly lower in Spain for both arterial and central venous catheters (V = 0.336). Private hospitals used more CBSD in arterial catheter than public ones (27% vs 8.3%, V = 0.278).

Conclusion

Point-of-care testing can be improved in Latin America, while the use of CBSD and small-volume tubes can be enhanced in Spain. Private hospitals tend to implement blood-sparing techniques more effectively than public hospitals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática Perspectiva de género en la realización de la higiene en cuidados intensivos cardiológicos Barriers to reporting adverse events from the perspective of ICU nurses: A mixed-method study Drug interactions in a coronary care unit: Adversity or therapeutic success? Utilización de un sistema de valoración para la asignación de recurso humano en el transporte intrahospitalario del paciente ingresado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1