林火后抢救性采伐对蒙古北方森林干旱极限西伯利亚落叶松再生和生态系统碳储量的影响

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100720
Choimaa Dulamsuren , Avirmed Buyanbaatar , Ganbaatar Batsaikhan , Dovdondemberel Batdorj , Mookhor Khishigjargal , Chimidnyam Dorjsuren , Zandraabal Tsogt , Tumurbaatar Ariunbaatar , Batmunkh Munkhtuya , Daramragchaa Tuya
{"title":"林火后抢救性采伐对蒙古北方森林干旱极限西伯利亚落叶松再生和生态系统碳储量的影响","authors":"Choimaa Dulamsuren ,&nbsp;Avirmed Buyanbaatar ,&nbsp;Ganbaatar Batsaikhan ,&nbsp;Dovdondemberel Batdorj ,&nbsp;Mookhor Khishigjargal ,&nbsp;Chimidnyam Dorjsuren ,&nbsp;Zandraabal Tsogt ,&nbsp;Tumurbaatar Ariunbaatar ,&nbsp;Batmunkh Munkhtuya ,&nbsp;Daramragchaa Tuya","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Post-fire salvage logging is widely applied in Mongolia's boreal forests with the intent to prevent intact forests from logging. The rationale behind this approach is the assumption that the additional disturbance caused by the removal of standing deadwood after stand-replacing fire is of no further significance for the already heavily disturbed ecosystem. However, while there is a global debate on effects of salvage logging for regeneration success, biodiversity, and soil health, little evidence has been collected from strongly drought-limited southern boreal forests of Central Asia. Comparing sites with and without salvage logging, we investigated forests of Siberian larch (<em>Larix sibirica</em>) ca. 20 years after stand-replacing fire and asked whether postfire salvage logging affected regeneration density, terminal shoot length and radial stem increment, ecosystem carbon stock densities, and reduced organic layer depth and compacted the soil. The biomass of the larch regeneration was significantly reduced by salvage logging, while tree growth was not affected. The ecosystem carbon stock density of burnt forest without salvage logging was 202 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> and thus even in the lower range of intact larch forests from Mongolia, whereas burnt forests with salvage logging had organic carbon stock densities (104 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) that were lower than those of unburned grasslands in the forest-steppe. These results show that removing deadwood from burnt forest is not insignificant, but has the potential to delay forest recovery and strongly reduces organic carbon storage. However, we did not find significant reductions in soil organic carbon stocks or soil compaction. Nonetheless, our findings raise the question of whether careful management of intact forests (especially by selective felling under a continuous-cover forestry regime) would be a more ecologically sustainable alternative than post-fire salvage logging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of salvage logging after forest fire on Siberian larch regeneration and ecosystem carbon stocks at the drought limit of the boreal forest in Mongolia\",\"authors\":\"Choimaa Dulamsuren ,&nbsp;Avirmed Buyanbaatar ,&nbsp;Ganbaatar Batsaikhan ,&nbsp;Dovdondemberel Batdorj ,&nbsp;Mookhor Khishigjargal ,&nbsp;Chimidnyam Dorjsuren ,&nbsp;Zandraabal Tsogt ,&nbsp;Tumurbaatar Ariunbaatar ,&nbsp;Batmunkh Munkhtuya ,&nbsp;Daramragchaa Tuya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Post-fire salvage logging is widely applied in Mongolia's boreal forests with the intent to prevent intact forests from logging. The rationale behind this approach is the assumption that the additional disturbance caused by the removal of standing deadwood after stand-replacing fire is of no further significance for the already heavily disturbed ecosystem. However, while there is a global debate on effects of salvage logging for regeneration success, biodiversity, and soil health, little evidence has been collected from strongly drought-limited southern boreal forests of Central Asia. Comparing sites with and without salvage logging, we investigated forests of Siberian larch (<em>Larix sibirica</em>) ca. 20 years after stand-replacing fire and asked whether postfire salvage logging affected regeneration density, terminal shoot length and radial stem increment, ecosystem carbon stock densities, and reduced organic layer depth and compacted the soil. The biomass of the larch regeneration was significantly reduced by salvage logging, while tree growth was not affected. The ecosystem carbon stock density of burnt forest without salvage logging was 202 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> and thus even in the lower range of intact larch forests from Mongolia, whereas burnt forests with salvage logging had organic carbon stock densities (104 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) that were lower than those of unburned grasslands in the forest-steppe. These results show that removing deadwood from burnt forest is not insignificant, but has the potential to delay forest recovery and strongly reduces organic carbon storage. However, we did not find significant reductions in soil organic carbon stocks or soil compaction. Nonetheless, our findings raise the question of whether careful management of intact forests (especially by selective felling under a continuous-cover forestry regime) would be a more ecologically sustainable alternative than post-fire salvage logging.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒙古北方森林广泛采用火后抢救性采伐,目的是防止完整的森林被采伐。这种方法的基本原理是假设在林分替代火灾后清除立木枯死木所造成的额外干扰对已经受到严重干扰的生态系统没有进一步的意义。然而,尽管全球范围内都在讨论抢救性砍伐对再生成功率、生物多样性和土壤健康的影响,但在中亚受干旱严重限制的南寒带森林中收集到的证据却很少。我们比较了进行和未进行抢救性采伐的地点,调查了林分替代火灾发生约 20 年后的西伯利亚落叶松(Larix sibirica)森林,询问火灾后的抢救性采伐是否会影响再生密度、顶芽长度和径向茎增量、生态系统碳储量密度,以及是否会降低有机层深度和压实土壤。抢救性采伐显著降低了落叶松再生林的生物量,但未影响树木生长。未进行抢救性采伐的烧毁森林的生态系统碳储量密度为 202 兆克碳/公顷-1,因此甚至处于蒙古完整落叶松森林的较低范围,而进行了抢救性采伐的烧毁森林的有机碳储量密度(104 兆克碳/公顷-1)低于森林草原未烧毁草原的有机碳储量密度。这些结果表明,清除烧毁森林中的枯木并非无关紧要,但有可能延迟森林恢复,并严重减少有机碳储存。不过,我们并没有发现土壤有机碳储量或土壤板结有明显减少。尽管如此,我们的研究结果还是提出了一个问题:与火灾后的抢救性采伐相比,对完好森林进行精心管理(尤其是在连续覆盖的林业制度下进行选择性砍伐)是否是一种更具生态可持续性的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of salvage logging after forest fire on Siberian larch regeneration and ecosystem carbon stocks at the drought limit of the boreal forest in Mongolia
Post-fire salvage logging is widely applied in Mongolia's boreal forests with the intent to prevent intact forests from logging. The rationale behind this approach is the assumption that the additional disturbance caused by the removal of standing deadwood after stand-replacing fire is of no further significance for the already heavily disturbed ecosystem. However, while there is a global debate on effects of salvage logging for regeneration success, biodiversity, and soil health, little evidence has been collected from strongly drought-limited southern boreal forests of Central Asia. Comparing sites with and without salvage logging, we investigated forests of Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) ca. 20 years after stand-replacing fire and asked whether postfire salvage logging affected regeneration density, terminal shoot length and radial stem increment, ecosystem carbon stock densities, and reduced organic layer depth and compacted the soil. The biomass of the larch regeneration was significantly reduced by salvage logging, while tree growth was not affected. The ecosystem carbon stock density of burnt forest without salvage logging was 202 Mg C ha−1 and thus even in the lower range of intact larch forests from Mongolia, whereas burnt forests with salvage logging had organic carbon stock densities (104 Mg C ha−1) that were lower than those of unburned grasslands in the forest-steppe. These results show that removing deadwood from burnt forest is not insignificant, but has the potential to delay forest recovery and strongly reduces organic carbon storage. However, we did not find significant reductions in soil organic carbon stocks or soil compaction. Nonetheless, our findings raise the question of whether careful management of intact forests (especially by selective felling under a continuous-cover forestry regime) would be a more ecologically sustainable alternative than post-fire salvage logging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of prescribed fire on fungal communities in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests in Mediterranean transitional zones Integrating public perception and quantitative metrics for improved urban park planning in Isfahan, Iran Effectiveness, efficiency, and equity in jurisdictional REDD+ benefit distribution mechanisms: Insights from Jambi province, Indonesia Property estimation, landowner perspectives and timber valuation of heirs property in North Carolina Challenges in harvesting and utilization of Ziziphus tree fruits in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1