使用三种不同技术进行关节镜下全内侧前十字韧带重建时股骨隧道置入的准确性;随机研究

Pankaj Rai , Vikas Kulshrestha , Munish Sood , Santhosh Kumar , Mustajib Ali , Soma Kulshrestha
{"title":"使用三种不同技术进行关节镜下全内侧前十字韧带重建时股骨隧道置入的准确性;随机研究","authors":"Pankaj Rai ,&nbsp;Vikas Kulshrestha ,&nbsp;Munish Sood ,&nbsp;Santhosh Kumar ,&nbsp;Mustajib Ali ,&nbsp;Soma Kulshrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One of the key steps in arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is getting the femoral tunnel at the right position to attach the graft. While the correct position has been described as a low and posterior position behind the bifurcate ridge on the medial surface of lateral femoral condyle, to reproducibly achieve it more than one technique is being used by surgeons. There are no randomized studies in literature which have evaluated the efficacy of these in a surgeon's hand. This study attempts to do that.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized study was performed at a military sports injury centre by a single surgical team led by two sports fellowship-trained surgeons. One hundred fifty patients undergoing ACLR surgery were randomized to Anteromedial Portal technique e (AMP)group, Far Anteromedial portal technique (FAMP) group and Outside in drilling (OI) group. We used postoperative three-dimensional Computed Tomogram (3D CT) to study tunnel position (Magnussen method), length and orientation (Basdekis method).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>80 % of femoral entry points were in satisfactory position using all three techniques. The ideal position was achieved more often using FAMP &amp; OI technique which was better than AMP, however it was not below level of significance set at P &lt; 0.025 (18, 13 &amp; 5 respectively using FAMP, OI and AMP techniques, p-value 0.08 OI vs AMP &amp; 0.07 AMP vs FAMP). The average femoral tunnel length was longest in OI group 34.72 ± 2.41 mm. The mean FAMP tunnel lengths were significantly smaller than the mean tunnel length of AMP and OI groups. (p-value &lt;0.01 FAMP vs OI and p-value &lt;0.01 FAMP vs AMP)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that all three techniques achieved acceptable femoral tunnel placement in 80 % cases. However, FAMP and OI technique further improved accuracy of achieving ideal tunnel location and OI technique predictably achieved longer tunnel length preventing risk of lateral blow out while using suspensory fixation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102799"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of femoral tunnel placement using three different techniques in performing arthroscopic all-inside anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction; A randomized study\",\"authors\":\"Pankaj Rai ,&nbsp;Vikas Kulshrestha ,&nbsp;Munish Sood ,&nbsp;Santhosh Kumar ,&nbsp;Mustajib Ali ,&nbsp;Soma Kulshrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One of the key steps in arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is getting the femoral tunnel at the right position to attach the graft. While the correct position has been described as a low and posterior position behind the bifurcate ridge on the medial surface of lateral femoral condyle, to reproducibly achieve it more than one technique is being used by surgeons. There are no randomized studies in literature which have evaluated the efficacy of these in a surgeon's hand. This study attempts to do that.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized study was performed at a military sports injury centre by a single surgical team led by two sports fellowship-trained surgeons. One hundred fifty patients undergoing ACLR surgery were randomized to Anteromedial Portal technique e (AMP)group, Far Anteromedial portal technique (FAMP) group and Outside in drilling (OI) group. We used postoperative three-dimensional Computed Tomogram (3D CT) to study tunnel position (Magnussen method), length and orientation (Basdekis method).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>80 % of femoral entry points were in satisfactory position using all three techniques. The ideal position was achieved more often using FAMP &amp; OI technique which was better than AMP, however it was not below level of significance set at P &lt; 0.025 (18, 13 &amp; 5 respectively using FAMP, OI and AMP techniques, p-value 0.08 OI vs AMP &amp; 0.07 AMP vs FAMP). The average femoral tunnel length was longest in OI group 34.72 ± 2.41 mm. The mean FAMP tunnel lengths were significantly smaller than the mean tunnel length of AMP and OI groups. (p-value &lt;0.01 FAMP vs OI and p-value &lt;0.01 FAMP vs AMP)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that all three techniques achieved acceptable femoral tunnel placement in 80 % cases. However, FAMP and OI technique further improved accuracy of achieving ideal tunnel location and OI technique predictably achieved longer tunnel length preventing risk of lateral blow out while using suspensory fixation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102799\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566224004685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566224004685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在关节镜下进行前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的关键步骤之一是使股骨隧道处于连接移植物的正确位置。虽然正确的位置被描述为股骨外侧髁内侧表面分叉嵴后方的低位和后方位置,但外科医生正在使用多种技术来重复实现这一目标。目前还没有文献对外科医生使用这些技术的效果进行随机评估。这项随机研究是在一家军事运动损伤中心进行的,由两名受过运动研究培训的外科医生带领一个手术团队进行。接受前交叉韧带重建手术的 150 名患者被随机分为前内侧门户技术(AMP)组、远端前内侧门户技术(FAMP)组和钻孔外(OI)组。我们使用术后三维计算机断层扫描(3D CT)研究隧道位置(马格努森法)、长度和方向(巴斯德基斯法)。FAMP、OI 和 AMP 技术分别为 18、13 和 5,P 值为 0.08 OI vs AMP & 0.07 AMP vs FAMP)。OI 组的股骨隧道平均长度最长,为 34.72 ± 2.41 毫米。FAMP 隧道的平均长度明显小于 AMP 组和 OI 组。(结论我们的研究表明,在 80% 的病例中,所有三种技术都实现了可接受的股骨隧道置入。不过,FAMP 和 OI 技术进一步提高了实现理想隧道位置的准确性,而 OI 技术可预测地实现了更长的隧道长度,从而在使用悬吊固定时避免了侧吹的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of femoral tunnel placement using three different techniques in performing arthroscopic all-inside anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction; A randomized study

Background

One of the key steps in arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is getting the femoral tunnel at the right position to attach the graft. While the correct position has been described as a low and posterior position behind the bifurcate ridge on the medial surface of lateral femoral condyle, to reproducibly achieve it more than one technique is being used by surgeons. There are no randomized studies in literature which have evaluated the efficacy of these in a surgeon's hand. This study attempts to do that.

Methods

This randomized study was performed at a military sports injury centre by a single surgical team led by two sports fellowship-trained surgeons. One hundred fifty patients undergoing ACLR surgery were randomized to Anteromedial Portal technique e (AMP)group, Far Anteromedial portal technique (FAMP) group and Outside in drilling (OI) group. We used postoperative three-dimensional Computed Tomogram (3D CT) to study tunnel position (Magnussen method), length and orientation (Basdekis method).

Results

80 % of femoral entry points were in satisfactory position using all three techniques. The ideal position was achieved more often using FAMP & OI technique which was better than AMP, however it was not below level of significance set at P < 0.025 (18, 13 & 5 respectively using FAMP, OI and AMP techniques, p-value 0.08 OI vs AMP & 0.07 AMP vs FAMP). The average femoral tunnel length was longest in OI group 34.72 ± 2.41 mm. The mean FAMP tunnel lengths were significantly smaller than the mean tunnel length of AMP and OI groups. (p-value <0.01 FAMP vs OI and p-value <0.01 FAMP vs AMP)

Conclusion

Our study showed that all three techniques achieved acceptable femoral tunnel placement in 80 % cases. However, FAMP and OI technique further improved accuracy of achieving ideal tunnel location and OI technique predictably achieved longer tunnel length preventing risk of lateral blow out while using suspensory fixation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1