社会规范与使用电子烟的风险状况之间的关联:对得克萨斯州六年级学生的性别分层分析

Sarina A. Attri , Andrew E. Springer , Baojiang Chen , Steven H. Kelder , Dale S. Mantey
{"title":"社会规范与使用电子烟的风险状况之间的关联:对得克萨斯州六年级学生的性别分层分析","authors":"Sarina A. Attri ,&nbsp;Andrew E. Springer ,&nbsp;Baojiang Chen ,&nbsp;Steven H. Kelder ,&nbsp;Dale S. Mantey","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>E-cigarette use remains high among adolescents, underscoring the need to identify targetable risk factors for intervention. This study examines associations between two social norms constructs (prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability) and at-risk status for e-cigarette use among Texas early adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the CATCH My Breath study, which included n=1032 Texas sixth graders. Students who had ever used or were susceptible to using e-cigarettes were categorized as at-risk for long-term use. Susceptibility was measured using a 3-item index assessing curiosity, intentions, and receptivity to using e-cigarettes. Multi-level logistic regressions assessed associations between social norm constructs and at-risk status for the full and sex-stratified samples. Covariates were race, ethnicity, academics, household/peer tobacco use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 36 % of 6th grade students were at-risk for e-cigarette use. Approximately 49 % of students overestimated peer e-cigarette use (“prevalence misperceptions”), and 43 % believed adolescent e-cigarette use is highly acceptable (“social acceptability”). Controlling for covariates, students with medium (aOR=1.89; 95 %CI=1.35–2.65) and high (aOR=1.98; 95 %CI=1.41–2.78) prevalence misperceptions had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those with low misperceptions. Students reporting medium (aOR=2.50; 95 %CI=1.66–3.76) and high (aOR=4.70; 95 %CI=3.21–6.90) social acceptability had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those reporting low acceptability. This association was stronger for females, relative to males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability were associated with being at-risk for e-cigarette use among this sample of Texas early adolescents. Interventions should consider incorporating these social norms into intervention content.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between social norms and at-risk status for e-cigarette use: A sex-stratified analysis of Texas sixth-grade students\",\"authors\":\"Sarina A. Attri ,&nbsp;Andrew E. Springer ,&nbsp;Baojiang Chen ,&nbsp;Steven H. Kelder ,&nbsp;Dale S. Mantey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>E-cigarette use remains high among adolescents, underscoring the need to identify targetable risk factors for intervention. This study examines associations between two social norms constructs (prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability) and at-risk status for e-cigarette use among Texas early adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the CATCH My Breath study, which included n=1032 Texas sixth graders. Students who had ever used or were susceptible to using e-cigarettes were categorized as at-risk for long-term use. Susceptibility was measured using a 3-item index assessing curiosity, intentions, and receptivity to using e-cigarettes. Multi-level logistic regressions assessed associations between social norm constructs and at-risk status for the full and sex-stratified samples. Covariates were race, ethnicity, academics, household/peer tobacco use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 36 % of 6th grade students were at-risk for e-cigarette use. Approximately 49 % of students overestimated peer e-cigarette use (“prevalence misperceptions”), and 43 % believed adolescent e-cigarette use is highly acceptable (“social acceptability”). Controlling for covariates, students with medium (aOR=1.89; 95 %CI=1.35–2.65) and high (aOR=1.98; 95 %CI=1.41–2.78) prevalence misperceptions had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those with low misperceptions. Students reporting medium (aOR=2.50; 95 %CI=1.66–3.76) and high (aOR=4.70; 95 %CI=3.21–6.90) social acceptability had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those reporting low acceptability. This association was stronger for females, relative to males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability were associated with being at-risk for e-cigarette use among this sample of Texas early adolescents. Interventions should consider incorporating these social norms into intervention content.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景电子烟使用率在青少年中居高不下,这说明有必要确定可进行干预的目标风险因素。本研究探讨了两种社会规范结构(流行误解和社会可接受性)与德克萨斯州低年级青少年使用电子烟的风险状况之间的关联。方法我们对 CATCH My Breath 研究的基线数据进行了横断面分析,该研究包括 1032 名德克萨斯州六年级学生。曾经使用过或容易使用电子烟的学生被归类为有长期使用电子烟的风险。易感性采用 3 个项目的指数来衡量,分别评估使用电子烟的好奇心、意向和接受度。多级逻辑回归评估了全部样本和性别分层样本中社会规范构建与高危状态之间的关联。协变量包括种族、民族、学业、家庭/同伴烟草使用情况。约 49% 的学生高估了同伴使用电子烟的情况("流行误解"),43% 的学生认为青少年使用电子烟是非常容易被接受的("社会可接受性")。在控制协变量的情况下,流行误解程度中等(aOR=1.89;95 %CI=1.35-2.65)和较高(aOR=1.98;95 %CI=1.41-2.78)的学生比误解程度低的学生有更大的使用电子烟的风险。与社会接受度低的学生相比,社会接受度中等(aOR=2.50;95 %CI=1.66-3.76)和高(aOR=4.70;95 %CI=3.21-6.90)的学生使用电子烟的风险几率更大。结论在德克萨斯州早期青少年样本中,较高的流行误解和社会接受度与使用电子烟的风险有关。干预措施应考虑将这些社会规范纳入干预内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between social norms and at-risk status for e-cigarette use: A sex-stratified analysis of Texas sixth-grade students

Background

E-cigarette use remains high among adolescents, underscoring the need to identify targetable risk factors for intervention. This study examines associations between two social norms constructs (prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability) and at-risk status for e-cigarette use among Texas early adolescents.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the CATCH My Breath study, which included n=1032 Texas sixth graders. Students who had ever used or were susceptible to using e-cigarettes were categorized as at-risk for long-term use. Susceptibility was measured using a 3-item index assessing curiosity, intentions, and receptivity to using e-cigarettes. Multi-level logistic regressions assessed associations between social norm constructs and at-risk status for the full and sex-stratified samples. Covariates were race, ethnicity, academics, household/peer tobacco use.

Results

Overall, 36 % of 6th grade students were at-risk for e-cigarette use. Approximately 49 % of students overestimated peer e-cigarette use (“prevalence misperceptions”), and 43 % believed adolescent e-cigarette use is highly acceptable (“social acceptability”). Controlling for covariates, students with medium (aOR=1.89; 95 %CI=1.35–2.65) and high (aOR=1.98; 95 %CI=1.41–2.78) prevalence misperceptions had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those with low misperceptions. Students reporting medium (aOR=2.50; 95 %CI=1.66–3.76) and high (aOR=4.70; 95 %CI=3.21–6.90) social acceptability had greater odds of being at-risk for e-cigarette use than those reporting low acceptability. This association was stronger for females, relative to males.

Conclusions

Greater prevalence misperceptions and social acceptability were associated with being at-risk for e-cigarette use among this sample of Texas early adolescents. Interventions should consider incorporating these social norms into intervention content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
期刊最新文献
Cannabidiol prescribing in the United States: An analysis of real-world data Discovering opioid slang on social media: A Word2Vec approach with reddit data Large decrease in syringe distribution following the introduction of fentanyl in King County, Washington A systematic review of the reasons for quitting and/or reducing alcohol among those who have received alcohol use disorder treatment The power of lived experience in optimizing US policymakers’ engagement with substance use research: A series of rapid-cycle randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1