Wii 平衡板对全膝关节置换术患者进行静态和动态平衡评估的可靠性

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.09.005
Ghazal Hashemi Zenooz , Afshin Taheriazam , Amir Massoud Arab , Hamidreza Mokhtarinia , Tahere Rezaeian , Samaneh Hosseinzadeh , Zahra Mosallanezhad
{"title":"Wii 平衡板对全膝关节置换术患者进行静态和动态平衡评估的可靠性","authors":"Ghazal Hashemi Zenooz ,&nbsp;Afshin Taheriazam ,&nbsp;Amir Massoud Arab ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Mokhtarinia ,&nbsp;Tahere Rezaeian ,&nbsp;Samaneh Hosseinzadeh ,&nbsp;Zahra Mosallanezhad","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Poor performance in practicing balance tasks is partly caused by the changes in the knee function and balance control activities following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of the static and dynamic balance measures using Wii Balance Board (WBB) in patients after TKA.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Thirty-one TKA patients (6 males, 27 females, mean age 55 ± 5.3 years) were involved in the study. They performed four standing balance trials on a WBB on two occasions, with an interval of 3–7 days apart. Double leg stance and functional reach task with opened and closed eyes were assessed in four trials. Extracted center of pressure (COP) measures collected included: mean velocity, medio-lateral displacement, antero-posterior displacement, and area. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measure (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman plots were calculated to show the reliability of COP measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.86 for the four trials indicating moderate-to-good reliability. Just the medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition showed weak reliability (ICC = 0.29). The highest and lowest ICC values (0.86, 0.29) were obtained for COP medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition and medio-lateral displacement in double leg close eyes condition measures, respectively. SEM (0.03–5.93) and MDC (0.09–16.45) range scores varied. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference between two trials in both opened and closed eyed conditions, indicating strong agreement between assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that the WBB was a reliable tool for assessing static and dynamic balance tests in TKA patients, making it as a suitable tool for standing balance assessment in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of the Wii balance board for static and dynamic balance assessment in total knee arthroplasty patients\",\"authors\":\"Ghazal Hashemi Zenooz ,&nbsp;Afshin Taheriazam ,&nbsp;Amir Massoud Arab ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Mokhtarinia ,&nbsp;Tahere Rezaeian ,&nbsp;Samaneh Hosseinzadeh ,&nbsp;Zahra Mosallanezhad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Poor performance in practicing balance tasks is partly caused by the changes in the knee function and balance control activities following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of the static and dynamic balance measures using Wii Balance Board (WBB) in patients after TKA.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Thirty-one TKA patients (6 males, 27 females, mean age 55 ± 5.3 years) were involved in the study. They performed four standing balance trials on a WBB on two occasions, with an interval of 3–7 days apart. Double leg stance and functional reach task with opened and closed eyes were assessed in four trials. Extracted center of pressure (COP) measures collected included: mean velocity, medio-lateral displacement, antero-posterior displacement, and area. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measure (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman plots were calculated to show the reliability of COP measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.86 for the four trials indicating moderate-to-good reliability. Just the medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition showed weak reliability (ICC = 0.29). The highest and lowest ICC values (0.86, 0.29) were obtained for COP medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition and medio-lateral displacement in double leg close eyes condition measures, respectively. SEM (0.03–5.93) and MDC (0.09–16.45) range scores varied. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference between two trials in both opened and closed eyed conditions, indicating strong agreement between assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that the WBB was a reliable tool for assessing static and dynamic balance tests in TKA patients, making it as a suitable tool for standing balance assessment in clinical settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 膝关节置换术(TKA)后膝关节功能和平衡控制活动的变化是导致平衡练习表现不佳的部分原因。本研究旨在确定使用 Wii 平衡板(WBB)对 TKA 患者进行静态和动态平衡测量的重复测试可靠性。他们两次在 WBB 上进行了四次站立平衡试验,每次间隔 3-7 天。在四次试验中,分别对双腿站立和睁眼闭眼功能性伸手任务进行了评估。提取的压力中心(COP)测量值包括:平均速度、内外侧位移、前后位移和面积。计算了类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和布兰-阿尔特曼图,以显示 COP 测量的可靠性。只有双腿睁眼条件下的内外侧位移显示出较低的可靠性(ICC = 0.29)。双腿睁眼状态下的 COP 内外侧位移和双腿闭眼状态下的内外侧位移分别获得了最高和最低的 ICC 值(0.86、0.29)。SEM(0.03-5.93)和 MDC(0.09-16.45)范围得分各不相同。结论:这些研究结果表明,WBB 是评估 TKA 患者静态和动态平衡测试的可靠工具,适合在临床环境中用于站立平衡评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of the Wii balance board for static and dynamic balance assessment in total knee arthroplasty patients

Purpose

Poor performance in practicing balance tasks is partly caused by the changes in the knee function and balance control activities following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of the static and dynamic balance measures using Wii Balance Board (WBB) in patients after TKA.

Design

Thirty-one TKA patients (6 males, 27 females, mean age 55 ± 5.3 years) were involved in the study. They performed four standing balance trials on a WBB on two occasions, with an interval of 3–7 days apart. Double leg stance and functional reach task with opened and closed eyes were assessed in four trials. Extracted center of pressure (COP) measures collected included: mean velocity, medio-lateral displacement, antero-posterior displacement, and area. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measure (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman plots were calculated to show the reliability of COP measures.

Results

ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.86 for the four trials indicating moderate-to-good reliability. Just the medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition showed weak reliability (ICC = 0.29). The highest and lowest ICC values (0.86, 0.29) were obtained for COP medio-lateral displacement in double leg open eyes condition and medio-lateral displacement in double leg close eyes condition measures, respectively. SEM (0.03–5.93) and MDC (0.09–16.45) range scores varied. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference between two trials in both opened and closed eyed conditions, indicating strong agreement between assessments.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the WBB was a reliable tool for assessing static and dynamic balance tests in TKA patients, making it as a suitable tool for standing balance assessment in clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Eight weeks of Pilates Method improves physical fitness and sleep quality of individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized clinical trial blinded The effectiveness of foam rolling with and without vibration and static stretching on range of motion, muscle strength and proprioception of the ankle joint in adults with chronic ankle instability Investigating the impact of various insole applications on balance and postural stability in the elderly Clustering of shoulder movement patterns using K-means algorithm based on the shoulder range of motion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1