{"title":"他们真的是认真的吗?保守派气候核心小组的赞成和反对意见","authors":"Jean-Daniel Collomb","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103835"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do they really mean it? What the conservative climate caucus is for and against\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Daniel Collomb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004262\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do they really mean it? What the conservative climate caucus is for and against
I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.