他们真的是认真的吗?保守派气候核心小组的赞成和反对意见

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103835
Jean-Daniel Collomb
{"title":"他们真的是认真的吗?保守派气候核心小组的赞成和反对意见","authors":"Jean-Daniel Collomb","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103835"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do they really mean it? What the conservative climate caucus is for and against\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Daniel Collomb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004262\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰-柯蒂斯众议员于 2021 年 6 月成立了 "保守派气候核心小组"(Conservative Climate Caucus),旨在提高国会共和党人对气候变化的认识,并整合出共和党人可能愿意批准的气候政策。揭示其主张的实质有助于评估共和党在能源政策上偏离不重视气候变化的做法的实际可能性。保守派气候核心小组成员的声明和政策建议从五个不同的方面进行了分析:(1)政府在能源领域的适当角色,(2)化石燃料在美国未来能源结构中的作用,(3)美国能源生产的地缘政治层面,(4)两党在能源政策方面的前景,以及(5)经济增长与去碳化之间的联系。定性分析表明,该核心小组的成员在很大程度上倾向于与共和党主流派保持一致,即敌视新法规和税收、气候多边主义以及逐步淘汰化石燃料,但与支持唐纳德-特朗普的共和党人相比,他们更愿意接受联邦政府对绿色技术的支持。此外,他们对消极党派主义的顽固坚持使得未来与民主党人在可能达成一致的政策上进行合作的可能性不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do they really mean it? What the conservative climate caucus is for and against
I investigate the ideas and favored policies of the Conservative Climate Caucus, founded by Representative John Curtis in June 2021, with a view to raising awareness of climate change among Congressional Republicans and cobbling together climate policies that Republicans could be willing to approve. Uncovering the substance of their propositions can help one assess the actual potential for a departure from a Republican approach to energy policy that does not take heed of climate change. The statements and policy proposals of Conservative Climate Caucus members are analyzed along five distinct dimensions: (1) the proper role of the government in the energy sector, (2) the role of fossil fuels in the future energy mix of the United States, (3) the geopolitical dimension of US energy production, (4) the prospects of bipartisanship in energy policy, and (5) the link between economic growth and decarbonization. This qualitative analysis suggests that the members of the caucus tend to remain largely aligned with mainstream Republican hostility toward new regulations and taxes, climate multilateralism, and the phasing out of fossil fuels, but are much more open to federal support for green technologies than Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. Further, their persistent adherence to negative partisanship makes future cooperation with Democrats on policies they may agree on unlikely.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends? Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ Connected, complex, and carbonized: The country archetypes of the petrochemicals sector Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany Energy subsidies versus cash transfers: the causal effect of misperceptions on public support for countermeasures during the energy crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1