能源社区、分布式发电、可再生能源:近亲还是潜在朋友?

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103828
Stefano Moroni
{"title":"能源社区、分布式发电、可再生能源:近亲还是潜在朋友?","authors":"Stefano Moroni","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The issue of “energy communities” is increasingly central to public and academic debate. However, the current discourse on energy communities often mixes three different aspects in an unclear manner. The first aspect is the type of energy source: that is, fossil or renewable. The second aspect is the general configuration of energy production: centralised or distributed. The third aspect is the type of prosumers: individuals or communities. These three aspects are not directly related (they concern three different issues), although they may be compatible. This article critically considers these three aspects and the distinctive advantages of the second item in the three pairs: renewable sources; distributed energy production; communities as prosumers. The intention is not merely to provide an overview of the state of the art; it is also to suggest a critical reframing of the discourse. The overall aim is not solely to distinguish different aspects (and advantages); it is also to clarify the real scope and meaning of each of them. Since the three aspects considered (renewables, distributed generation, energy communities) are distinct and conceptually independent from each other, various possible arrangements (i.e., combinations) can be imagined. The article critically considers these various possible combinations and discusses precautions and caveats in terms of policies that should be taken into account in this regard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103828"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends?\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Moroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The issue of “energy communities” is increasingly central to public and academic debate. However, the current discourse on energy communities often mixes three different aspects in an unclear manner. The first aspect is the type of energy source: that is, fossil or renewable. The second aspect is the general configuration of energy production: centralised or distributed. The third aspect is the type of prosumers: individuals or communities. These three aspects are not directly related (they concern three different issues), although they may be compatible. This article critically considers these three aspects and the distinctive advantages of the second item in the three pairs: renewable sources; distributed energy production; communities as prosumers. The intention is not merely to provide an overview of the state of the art; it is also to suggest a critical reframing of the discourse. The overall aim is not solely to distinguish different aspects (and advantages); it is also to clarify the real scope and meaning of each of them. Since the three aspects considered (renewables, distributed generation, energy communities) are distinct and conceptually independent from each other, various possible arrangements (i.e., combinations) can be imagined. The article critically considers these various possible combinations and discusses precautions and caveats in terms of policies that should be taken into account in this regard.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004195\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源社区 "问题日益成为公众和学术讨论的核心。然而,目前关于能源社区的讨论往往将三个不同的方面混为一谈。第一个方面是能源类型:即化石能源还是可再生能源。第二个方面是能源生产的总体结构:集中式还是分布式。第三个方面是消费者的类型:个人还是社区。这三个方面没有直接联系(它们涉及三个不同的问题),尽管它们可能相互兼容。本文对这三个方面进行了批判性思考,并探讨了可再生能源、分布式能源生产、社区作为消费者这三者中第二项的独特优势。本文的目的不仅仅是概述目前的技术发展状况,还希望对相关论述提出批判性的重构建议。总体目标不仅仅是区分不同的方面(和优势),还要澄清每个方面的真正范围和含义。由于所考虑的三个方面(可再生能源、分布式发电、能源社区)是不同的,在概念上相互独立,因此可以想象出各种可能的安排(即组合)。文章批判性地考虑了这些可能的组合,并讨论了在这方面应考虑的政策方面的预防措施和注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends?
The issue of “energy communities” is increasingly central to public and academic debate. However, the current discourse on energy communities often mixes three different aspects in an unclear manner. The first aspect is the type of energy source: that is, fossil or renewable. The second aspect is the general configuration of energy production: centralised or distributed. The third aspect is the type of prosumers: individuals or communities. These three aspects are not directly related (they concern three different issues), although they may be compatible. This article critically considers these three aspects and the distinctive advantages of the second item in the three pairs: renewable sources; distributed energy production; communities as prosumers. The intention is not merely to provide an overview of the state of the art; it is also to suggest a critical reframing of the discourse. The overall aim is not solely to distinguish different aspects (and advantages); it is also to clarify the real scope and meaning of each of them. Since the three aspects considered (renewables, distributed generation, energy communities) are distinct and conceptually independent from each other, various possible arrangements (i.e., combinations) can be imagined. The article critically considers these various possible combinations and discusses precautions and caveats in terms of policies that should be taken into account in this regard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends? Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ Connected, complex, and carbonized: The country archetypes of the petrochemicals sector Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany Energy subsidies versus cash transfers: the causal effect of misperceptions on public support for countermeasures during the energy crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1