对儿童保护机构中被诊断患有边缘型人格障碍的父母的态度

Dana Laird , Dianna R. Bartsch , Sophie C. Dahlenburg
{"title":"对儿童保护机构中被诊断患有边缘型人格障碍的父母的态度","authors":"Dana Laird ,&nbsp;Dianna R. Bartsch ,&nbsp;Sophie C. Dahlenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parents diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) have been linked to high rates of child protection involvement. Research has shown that this diagnosis carries a significant amount of stigma. In the absence of standardised procedures for parenting capacity assessments within the child protection sector, the risk of stigma contributing to the decision-making process is high.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined if there were differences in how students and practitioners rated parenting capacity based on parenting scenarios where a parent had a diagnosis of BPD compared to a parent diagnosed with postnatal depression.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>The sample included 122 current, past, and prospective child protection workers who were recruited via social media and a local University.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rated parenting capacity based on two vignettes involving two scenarios (one where a parent had a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and post-natal depression in the other), along with general attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The parent in the BPD vignette was assessed as having poorer parenting capacity compared to the parent in the postnatal depression scenario. Interestingly, there was no significant association between the assessment of parenting capacity and participants general attitudes and skills towards people with a diagnosis of BPD. Differences between the ratings of professionals and students are described.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Further training providing psychoeducation BPD is recommended to reduce the potential impact of stigma on decision-making, particularly for professionals within child protection settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings\",\"authors\":\"Dana Laird ,&nbsp;Dianna R. Bartsch ,&nbsp;Sophie C. Dahlenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parents diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) have been linked to high rates of child protection involvement. Research has shown that this diagnosis carries a significant amount of stigma. In the absence of standardised procedures for parenting capacity assessments within the child protection sector, the risk of stigma contributing to the decision-making process is high.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined if there were differences in how students and practitioners rated parenting capacity based on parenting scenarios where a parent had a diagnosis of BPD compared to a parent diagnosed with postnatal depression.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>The sample included 122 current, past, and prospective child protection workers who were recruited via social media and a local University.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rated parenting capacity based on two vignettes involving two scenarios (one where a parent had a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and post-natal depression in the other), along with general attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The parent in the BPD vignette was assessed as having poorer parenting capacity compared to the parent in the postnatal depression scenario. Interestingly, there was no significant association between the assessment of parenting capacity and participants general attitudes and skills towards people with a diagnosis of BPD. Differences between the ratings of professionals and students are described.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Further training providing psychoeducation BPD is recommended to reduce the potential impact of stigma on decision-making, particularly for professionals within child protection settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Protection and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景被诊断出患有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的父母参与儿童保护的比例很高。研究表明,这种诊断带有很大的耻辱感。本研究考察了学生和从业人员在父母被诊断为 BPD 的情况下,与父母被诊断为产后抑郁症的情况下,对父母养育能力的评价是否存在差异。参与者和环境样本包括 122 名现任、前任和未来的儿童保护工作者,他们是通过社交媒体和当地一所大学招募的。方法参与者完成了一项在线调查,其中包括人口统计学问题,并根据涉及两种情景的两个小故事(一种是父母一方被诊断为边缘型人格障碍,另一种是父母一方被诊断为产后抑郁症)以及对被诊断为边缘型人格障碍患者的一般态度对养育能力进行评分。有趣的是,对育儿能力的评估与参与者对被诊断为 BPD 患者的一般态度和技能之间没有明显的关联。结论建议进一步开展提供 BPD 心理教育的培训,以减少污名化对决策的潜在影响,尤其是对儿童保护环境中的专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings

Background

Parents diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) have been linked to high rates of child protection involvement. Research has shown that this diagnosis carries a significant amount of stigma. In the absence of standardised procedures for parenting capacity assessments within the child protection sector, the risk of stigma contributing to the decision-making process is high.

Objective

This study examined if there were differences in how students and practitioners rated parenting capacity based on parenting scenarios where a parent had a diagnosis of BPD compared to a parent diagnosed with postnatal depression.

Participants and setting

The sample included 122 current, past, and prospective child protection workers who were recruited via social media and a local University.

Methods

Participants completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rated parenting capacity based on two vignettes involving two scenarios (one where a parent had a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and post-natal depression in the other), along with general attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD.

Results

The parent in the BPD vignette was assessed as having poorer parenting capacity compared to the parent in the postnatal depression scenario. Interestingly, there was no significant association between the assessment of parenting capacity and participants general attitudes and skills towards people with a diagnosis of BPD. Differences between the ratings of professionals and students are described.

Conclusions

Further training providing psychoeducation BPD is recommended to reduce the potential impact of stigma on decision-making, particularly for professionals within child protection settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing How could you help me? Children's voices on violence in child welfare files: A thematic analysis The use of technology and mobile health apps in child maltreatment interventions: Perspectives of TF-CBT therapists and SafeCare providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1