中国的排污权交易制度减少了碳排放吗?电力行业企业层面的证据

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124802
Baixue Wang, Maosheng Duan
{"title":"中国的排污权交易制度减少了碳排放吗?电力行业企业层面的证据","authors":"Baixue Wang,&nbsp;Maosheng Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading systems (ETSs) in reducing emissions is crucial for achieving carbon neutrality and global climate targets. However, existing research presents conflicting results regarding their impact on the carbon intensity of output, likely due to data and methodological challenges. This study examines the impact of China's regional ETSs on carbon emissions and carbon intensity in the power sector, utilizing verified firm-level carbon emission data and annually updated regulatory lists of firms. The findings indicate that the ETSs significantly reduced carbon emissions primarily through reduced power generation, with little impact on carbon intensity. Nonetheless, large allowance shortages and high carbon prices contributed to the reduction of carbon intensity, while large market size, high liquidity, and stringent penalties had a limited impact on emission reductions. The study also found that firms with lower levels of technology were under more pressure, while those with advanced technology were under less pressure, suggesting that the ETSs served to “reward the good and punish the bad.” This implies that although the ETSs did not increase the efficiency of coal-fired firms, they contributed to optimizing the power generation structure by reducing the output of coal-fired firms and incentivizing the replacement of outdated capacity. Moreover, no evidence of carbon leakage to neighboring provinces or within the same ownership networks was found. These insights are valuable for designing both China's national ETS and ETSs in other countries with similar conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124802"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have China's emissions trading systems reduced carbon emissions? Firm-level evidence from the power sector\",\"authors\":\"Baixue Wang,&nbsp;Maosheng Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading systems (ETSs) in reducing emissions is crucial for achieving carbon neutrality and global climate targets. However, existing research presents conflicting results regarding their impact on the carbon intensity of output, likely due to data and methodological challenges. This study examines the impact of China's regional ETSs on carbon emissions and carbon intensity in the power sector, utilizing verified firm-level carbon emission data and annually updated regulatory lists of firms. The findings indicate that the ETSs significantly reduced carbon emissions primarily through reduced power generation, with little impact on carbon intensity. Nonetheless, large allowance shortages and high carbon prices contributed to the reduction of carbon intensity, while large market size, high liquidity, and stringent penalties had a limited impact on emission reductions. The study also found that firms with lower levels of technology were under more pressure, while those with advanced technology were under less pressure, suggesting that the ETSs served to “reward the good and punish the bad.” This implies that although the ETSs did not increase the efficiency of coal-fired firms, they contributed to optimizing the power generation structure by reducing the output of coal-fired firms and incentivizing the replacement of outdated capacity. Moreover, no evidence of carbon leakage to neighboring provinces or within the same ownership networks was found. These insights are valuable for designing both China's national ETS and ETSs in other countries with similar conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"378 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021858\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国碳排放交易体系(ETS)的减排效果对于实现碳中和和全球气候目标至关重要。然而,可能由于数据和方法上的挑战,现有研究在其对产出碳强度的影响方面呈现出相互矛盾的结果。本研究利用经核实的企业碳排放数据和每年更新的企业监管名单,考察了中国区域排放交易计划对电力行业碳排放和碳强度的影响。研究结果表明,排放交易计划主要通过减少发电量来大幅降低碳排放量,对碳强度的影响很小。然而,大量配额短缺和高碳价格有助于降低碳强度,而庞大的市场规模、高流动性和严格的惩罚措施对减排的影响有限。研究还发现,技术水平较低的企业受到的压力较大,而技术先进的企业受到的压力较小,这表明排放交易计划起到了 "奖优罚劣 "的作用。这意味着,尽管排放交易计划没有提高燃煤企业的效率,但通过减少燃煤企业的产量和激励落后产能的替代,排放交易计划有助于优化发电结构。此外,没有证据表明碳泄漏到邻近省份或同一所有权网络内。这些启示对于设计中国的国家排放交易计划和其他具有类似条件的国家的排放交易计划都很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Have China's emissions trading systems reduced carbon emissions? Firm-level evidence from the power sector
The effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading systems (ETSs) in reducing emissions is crucial for achieving carbon neutrality and global climate targets. However, existing research presents conflicting results regarding their impact on the carbon intensity of output, likely due to data and methodological challenges. This study examines the impact of China's regional ETSs on carbon emissions and carbon intensity in the power sector, utilizing verified firm-level carbon emission data and annually updated regulatory lists of firms. The findings indicate that the ETSs significantly reduced carbon emissions primarily through reduced power generation, with little impact on carbon intensity. Nonetheless, large allowance shortages and high carbon prices contributed to the reduction of carbon intensity, while large market size, high liquidity, and stringent penalties had a limited impact on emission reductions. The study also found that firms with lower levels of technology were under more pressure, while those with advanced technology were under less pressure, suggesting that the ETSs served to “reward the good and punish the bad.” This implies that although the ETSs did not increase the efficiency of coal-fired firms, they contributed to optimizing the power generation structure by reducing the output of coal-fired firms and incentivizing the replacement of outdated capacity. Moreover, no evidence of carbon leakage to neighboring provinces or within the same ownership networks was found. These insights are valuable for designing both China's national ETS and ETSs in other countries with similar conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Boosting the power density of direct borohydride fuel cells to >600 mW cm−2 by cathode water management Editorial Board A distributed thermal-pressure coupling model of large-format lithium iron phosphate battery thermal runaway Optimization and parametric analysis of a novel design of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using artificial neural network Delay-tolerant hierarchical distributed control for DC microgrid clusters considering microgrid autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1