Ben Moins , David Hernando , Dieter Seghers , Wim Van den bergh , Amaryllis Audenaert
{"title":"为沥青行业制定温室气体排放基准 - 短期减排目标是否可行,是采用现行做法,还是需要采取更广泛的措施?","authors":"Ben Moins , David Hernando , Dieter Seghers , Wim Van den bergh , Amaryllis Audenaert","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to calculate cradle-to-gate benchmarks for the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of asphalt mixtures. Reference (median), target (10<sup>th</sup> percentile), and limit (80<sup>th</sup> percentile) benchmarks were calculated for nine mixture types using 606 mixtures. The following ranges for the specific benchmarks in terms of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per ton were obtained: 41.2 to 66.7 (references), 31.2 to 52.9 (targets), and 44.8 to 75.3 (limits). It was found that the yearly embodied emissions could be reduced by 23.7 % by aiming for the targets, which is just below the 25 % reduction goal set in Belgium. However, these savings could be further increased to 29.3 % considering consistent implementation of the most used best available technologies. Moreover, if the lowest 10<sup>th</sup> percentile of this scenario was targeted, an ambitious reduction potential of 39.2 % was obtained. Consequently, a combination of more extreme mitigation strategies is required to achieve carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107994"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing greenhouse gas emission benchmarks for the asphalt industry – Are short-term reduction targets feasible using current practice or are more extensive measures needed?\",\"authors\":\"Ben Moins , David Hernando , Dieter Seghers , Wim Van den bergh , Amaryllis Audenaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective of this study was to calculate cradle-to-gate benchmarks for the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of asphalt mixtures. Reference (median), target (10<sup>th</sup> percentile), and limit (80<sup>th</sup> percentile) benchmarks were calculated for nine mixture types using 606 mixtures. The following ranges for the specific benchmarks in terms of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per ton were obtained: 41.2 to 66.7 (references), 31.2 to 52.9 (targets), and 44.8 to 75.3 (limits). It was found that the yearly embodied emissions could be reduced by 23.7 % by aiming for the targets, which is just below the 25 % reduction goal set in Belgium. However, these savings could be further increased to 29.3 % considering consistent implementation of the most used best available technologies. Moreover, if the lowest 10<sup>th</sup> percentile of this scenario was targeted, an ambitious reduction potential of 39.2 % was obtained. Consequently, a combination of more extreme mitigation strategies is required to achieve carbon neutrality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005858\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing greenhouse gas emission benchmarks for the asphalt industry – Are short-term reduction targets feasible using current practice or are more extensive measures needed?
The objective of this study was to calculate cradle-to-gate benchmarks for the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of asphalt mixtures. Reference (median), target (10th percentile), and limit (80th percentile) benchmarks were calculated for nine mixture types using 606 mixtures. The following ranges for the specific benchmarks in terms of CO2-eq per ton were obtained: 41.2 to 66.7 (references), 31.2 to 52.9 (targets), and 44.8 to 75.3 (limits). It was found that the yearly embodied emissions could be reduced by 23.7 % by aiming for the targets, which is just below the 25 % reduction goal set in Belgium. However, these savings could be further increased to 29.3 % considering consistent implementation of the most used best available technologies. Moreover, if the lowest 10th percentile of this scenario was targeted, an ambitious reduction potential of 39.2 % was obtained. Consequently, a combination of more extreme mitigation strategies is required to achieve carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.