风险有多大?这要看情况。企业家和员工对国内城市制度风险的看法

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00503
Kaitlyn DeGhetto , Zachary A. Russell
{"title":"风险有多大?这要看情况。企业家和员工对国内城市制度风险的看法","authors":"Kaitlyn DeGhetto ,&nbsp;Zachary A. Russell","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With a focus on entrepreneurs' decisions related to domestic location choices, this study draws from the international business institutional risk literature to evaluate city-level risk perceptions while accounting for individual-level political views. Specifically, we surveyed entrepreneurs and prospective employees in an effort to evaluate how important 1) safety risk, 2) political risk, and 3) social risk are when considering where to live, work, and start businesses. This process also included a comparison to ease of doing business, a previously studied driver of investment decisions. To identify low (and high) risk domestic investment locations, we had participants rate 25 large U.S. cities on the risk factors. Our findings indicate that entrepreneurs and prospective employees care about the city-level institutional risk factors. However, the focus and perceptions of entrepreneurs and prospective employees are greatly influenced by political views, perceptions do not always mirror objective data, and the two groups weight risk differently. The key insight of our study is that, in order to access and maintain valuable human capital, entrepreneurs should begin considering employees' perceptions related to city-level institutional risk. Importantly, these perceptions are biased by factors such as one's political views. Likewise, to attract business investment, city leaders should consider these risk perceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e00503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s the risk? It depends. Entrepreneurs’ and employees’ perceptions of domestic city-level institutional risk\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn DeGhetto ,&nbsp;Zachary A. Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With a focus on entrepreneurs' decisions related to domestic location choices, this study draws from the international business institutional risk literature to evaluate city-level risk perceptions while accounting for individual-level political views. Specifically, we surveyed entrepreneurs and prospective employees in an effort to evaluate how important 1) safety risk, 2) political risk, and 3) social risk are when considering where to live, work, and start businesses. This process also included a comparison to ease of doing business, a previously studied driver of investment decisions. To identify low (and high) risk domestic investment locations, we had participants rate 25 large U.S. cities on the risk factors. Our findings indicate that entrepreneurs and prospective employees care about the city-level institutional risk factors. However, the focus and perceptions of entrepreneurs and prospective employees are greatly influenced by political views, perceptions do not always mirror objective data, and the two groups weight risk differently. The key insight of our study is that, in order to access and maintain valuable human capital, entrepreneurs should begin considering employees' perceptions related to city-level institutional risk. Importantly, these perceptions are biased by factors such as one's political views. Likewise, to attract business investment, city leaders should consider these risk perceptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673424000556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673424000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以创业者的国内地点选择决策为重点,借鉴国际商业机构风险文献,在考虑个人政治观点的同时,评估城市层面的风险认知。具体来说,我们对创业者和未来雇员进行了调查,以评估在考虑居住、工作和创业地点时,1)安全风险、2)政治风险和 3)社会风险的重要性。这一过程还包括与经商便利性的比较,经商便利性是以前研究过的投资决策驱动因素。为了确定低(和高)风险的国内投资地点,我们让参与者对 25 个美国大城市的风险因素进行评分。我们的研究结果表明,企业家和潜在雇员都很关注城市层面的制度风险因素。然而,企业家和未来雇员的关注点和看法在很大程度上受政治观点的影响,看法并不总是反映客观数据,而且这两个群体对风险的权重也不尽相同。我们研究的主要启示是,为了获得并维持宝贵的人力资本,企业家应开始考虑员工对城市制度风险的看法。重要的是,这些看法会受到个人政治观点等因素的影响。同样,为了吸引企业投资,城市领导者也应考虑这些风险认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s the risk? It depends. Entrepreneurs’ and employees’ perceptions of domestic city-level institutional risk
With a focus on entrepreneurs' decisions related to domestic location choices, this study draws from the international business institutional risk literature to evaluate city-level risk perceptions while accounting for individual-level political views. Specifically, we surveyed entrepreneurs and prospective employees in an effort to evaluate how important 1) safety risk, 2) political risk, and 3) social risk are when considering where to live, work, and start businesses. This process also included a comparison to ease of doing business, a previously studied driver of investment decisions. To identify low (and high) risk domestic investment locations, we had participants rate 25 large U.S. cities on the risk factors. Our findings indicate that entrepreneurs and prospective employees care about the city-level institutional risk factors. However, the focus and perceptions of entrepreneurs and prospective employees are greatly influenced by political views, perceptions do not always mirror objective data, and the two groups weight risk differently. The key insight of our study is that, in order to access and maintain valuable human capital, entrepreneurs should begin considering employees' perceptions related to city-level institutional risk. Importantly, these perceptions are biased by factors such as one's political views. Likewise, to attract business investment, city leaders should consider these risk perceptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1