水头高度对澳大利亚东南部拖网捕鱼量的影响

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Fisheries Research Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107219
Matt K. Broadhurst , Russell B. Millar
{"title":"水头高度对澳大利亚东南部拖网捕鱼量的影响","authors":"Matt K. Broadhurst ,&nbsp;Russell B. Millar","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Benthic fish trawls are used off southeastern Australia to target multiple species that have similar sizes and morphologies to non-target species. These characteristics mean there are limited options for improving selectivity via changes to meshes and/or bycatch reduction devices in the codend. Consequently, simple modifications to the anterior trawl body that potentially exploit behavioural differences to separate species before entry have been prioritised for testing. Optimising trawl headline height is recognized as important for refining selectivity, but causal effects can be difficult to isolate owing to variability among confounding operational or technical factors (such as variable spread ratios, ground gears, and/or towing speeds). Here we attempted to isolate the effects of headline height by alternately fishing a conventional trawl (mean headline height ± SE of 3.76 ± 0.07 m) with a design that was identical in key aspects, but had a ∼22 % reduction in fishing circumference at the mouth and therefore a similar lower average headline height (2.75 ± 0.07 m) across homogenous operational variables. There were no significant differences in the numbers and weights of retained and discarded species between the two trawls, although mean catches of the primary target, tiger flathead, <em>Platycephaus richardsoni</em> were ∼25 % lower in the low trawl, implying this species orientates across the range of conventionally fished heights. Regardless of the trawl, there was a significant, negative main effect of headline height on the weights of total discards and two abundant batoids (smooth stingray, <em>Bathytoshia brevicaudata</em> and greenback stingaree, <em>Urolophus viridis</em>) attributed to lower ground-gear contact pressure and/or an increased footrope height of both trawls, facilitating the escape of some individuals under the trawl. The only other species affected by headline height was velvet leatherjacket <em>Meuschenia scaber</em>, with catches increasing as headline increased; possibly owing to changes in netting panel angles at the trawl mouth that precluded escape. It should be possible to marginally reduce the circumference at the mouth of regional trawls and so reduce headline height and at least some drag while maintaining target catches. More broadly, it appears that regardless of the trawl-body circumference, headline height can indirectly affect species selectivity via concomitant effects on other gear components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 107219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of headline height on catches in southeastern Australian fish trawls\",\"authors\":\"Matt K. Broadhurst ,&nbsp;Russell B. Millar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Benthic fish trawls are used off southeastern Australia to target multiple species that have similar sizes and morphologies to non-target species. These characteristics mean there are limited options for improving selectivity via changes to meshes and/or bycatch reduction devices in the codend. Consequently, simple modifications to the anterior trawl body that potentially exploit behavioural differences to separate species before entry have been prioritised for testing. Optimising trawl headline height is recognized as important for refining selectivity, but causal effects can be difficult to isolate owing to variability among confounding operational or technical factors (such as variable spread ratios, ground gears, and/or towing speeds). Here we attempted to isolate the effects of headline height by alternately fishing a conventional trawl (mean headline height ± SE of 3.76 ± 0.07 m) with a design that was identical in key aspects, but had a ∼22 % reduction in fishing circumference at the mouth and therefore a similar lower average headline height (2.75 ± 0.07 m) across homogenous operational variables. There were no significant differences in the numbers and weights of retained and discarded species between the two trawls, although mean catches of the primary target, tiger flathead, <em>Platycephaus richardsoni</em> were ∼25 % lower in the low trawl, implying this species orientates across the range of conventionally fished heights. Regardless of the trawl, there was a significant, negative main effect of headline height on the weights of total discards and two abundant batoids (smooth stingray, <em>Bathytoshia brevicaudata</em> and greenback stingaree, <em>Urolophus viridis</em>) attributed to lower ground-gear contact pressure and/or an increased footrope height of both trawls, facilitating the escape of some individuals under the trawl. The only other species affected by headline height was velvet leatherjacket <em>Meuschenia scaber</em>, with catches increasing as headline increased; possibly owing to changes in netting panel angles at the trawl mouth that precluded escape. It should be possible to marginally reduce the circumference at the mouth of regional trawls and so reduce headline height and at least some drag while maintaining target catches. More broadly, it appears that regardless of the trawl-body circumference, headline height can indirectly affect species selectivity via concomitant effects on other gear components.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":\"281 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚东南部近海使用底层拖网捕捞多个物种,这些物种的大小和形态与非目 标物种相似。这些特点意味着,通过改变网目和/或减少鳕尾副渔获物装置来提高选择性的选择有限。因此,对前部拖网体进行简单修改,可能利用行为差异在进入前分离物种,已被列为优先测试项目。优化拖网网头高度被认为对提高选择性非常重要,但由于混杂的操作或技术因素(如可变展宽比、地面渔具和/或拖网速度)之间存在差异,因此很难分离出因果效应。在这里,我们试图通过交替捕捞传统拖网(平均拖网高度± SE为3.76±0.07米)与在关键方面相同的设计来分离拖网高度的影响,但后者在网口处的捕捞周长减少了22%,因此在相同的操作变量中平均拖网高度较低(2.75±0.07米)。两种拖网的保留和丢弃鱼种的数量和重量没有明显差异,但低拖网的主要目标鱼--虎斑鲽(Platycephaus richardsoni)的平均渔获量比拖网低 25%,这意味着该鱼种在常规捕捞高度范围内都有取向。无论使用哪种拖网,拖网底线高度对总丢弃物重量和两种大量双尾目鱼类(光滑黄貂鱼(Bathytoshia brevicaudata)和绿背黄貂鱼(Urolophus viridis))的重量都有显著的负主效应,这归因于两种拖网较低的地面齿轮接触压力和/或较高的底线高度,有利于一些个体在拖网下逃脱。唯一受网头高度影响的其他物种是绒皮甲鱼(Meuschenia scaber),其渔获量随着网头高度的增加而增加;这可能是由于拖网口的网板角度发生了变化,使其无法逃脱。在保持目标渔获量的情况下,应该可以略微减小区域拖网口的周长,从而降低标题高度,至少减少一些阻力。从更广泛的角度看,无论拖网体周长如何,网头高度可通过对其他渔具部件的影响间接影响物种选择性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of headline height on catches in southeastern Australian fish trawls
Benthic fish trawls are used off southeastern Australia to target multiple species that have similar sizes and morphologies to non-target species. These characteristics mean there are limited options for improving selectivity via changes to meshes and/or bycatch reduction devices in the codend. Consequently, simple modifications to the anterior trawl body that potentially exploit behavioural differences to separate species before entry have been prioritised for testing. Optimising trawl headline height is recognized as important for refining selectivity, but causal effects can be difficult to isolate owing to variability among confounding operational or technical factors (such as variable spread ratios, ground gears, and/or towing speeds). Here we attempted to isolate the effects of headline height by alternately fishing a conventional trawl (mean headline height ± SE of 3.76 ± 0.07 m) with a design that was identical in key aspects, but had a ∼22 % reduction in fishing circumference at the mouth and therefore a similar lower average headline height (2.75 ± 0.07 m) across homogenous operational variables. There were no significant differences in the numbers and weights of retained and discarded species between the two trawls, although mean catches of the primary target, tiger flathead, Platycephaus richardsoni were ∼25 % lower in the low trawl, implying this species orientates across the range of conventionally fished heights. Regardless of the trawl, there was a significant, negative main effect of headline height on the weights of total discards and two abundant batoids (smooth stingray, Bathytoshia brevicaudata and greenback stingaree, Urolophus viridis) attributed to lower ground-gear contact pressure and/or an increased footrope height of both trawls, facilitating the escape of some individuals under the trawl. The only other species affected by headline height was velvet leatherjacket Meuschenia scaber, with catches increasing as headline increased; possibly owing to changes in netting panel angles at the trawl mouth that precluded escape. It should be possible to marginally reduce the circumference at the mouth of regional trawls and so reduce headline height and at least some drag while maintaining target catches. More broadly, it appears that regardless of the trawl-body circumference, headline height can indirectly affect species selectivity via concomitant effects on other gear components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
期刊最新文献
Otolith stable isotopes highlight the importance of local nursery areas as the origin of recruits to yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) fisheries in the western Indian Ocean Accounting for post-release mortality in data-limited, length-based assessments for four demersal fish species with varying life histories Long-term tagging reveals variable escapement of stocked Muskellunge among four Ohio reservoirs: Consequences for managing reservoir fisheries Otolith shape variability of labrid fish from Rapa Nui (Easter Island), southeastern Pacific Cormorant predation in fyke net fishing: The direct effects of a protected bird on coastal commercial fishing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1