Jing He , Dianah Mazlan , Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar , Li Chen
{"title":"基于分体式霍普金森拉杆的匀质砂浆与三维中观混凝土动态直接拉伸破坏机理的差异","authors":"Jing He , Dianah Mazlan , Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar , Li Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2024.104277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At the mesoscale, concrete is considered a three-phase composite material comprising stone, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone. Even though mortar is an important component of concrete, its material parameters have not been determined systematically, and they are often modeled by assuming that they are weaker versions of the concrete parameters. Therefore, accurately describing the role of mortar in concrete and the failure mechanism of concrete is difficult. The quasi-static and dynamic direct tensile tests were performed to obtain the stress–strain curves and failure modes of mortar specimens and to establish a formula describing the mortar strain-rate effect. Numerical simulations were then performed using the improved Karagozian and Case concrete models, and the obtained experimental data to clarify the differences in the failure mechanisms of mortar and concrete under dynamic tensile loads. Results showed that concrete had a higher tensile strength but a lower strain-rate effect than mortar. This paper provides an important contribution to study the failure analysis of concrete structures under dynamic loads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56133,"journal":{"name":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 104277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in dynamic direct tensile failure mechanism between homogeneous mortar and three-dimensional mesoscopic concrete based on the split Hopkinson tension bar\",\"authors\":\"Jing He , Dianah Mazlan , Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar , Li Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.finel.2024.104277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>At the mesoscale, concrete is considered a three-phase composite material comprising stone, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone. Even though mortar is an important component of concrete, its material parameters have not been determined systematically, and they are often modeled by assuming that they are weaker versions of the concrete parameters. Therefore, accurately describing the role of mortar in concrete and the failure mechanism of concrete is difficult. The quasi-static and dynamic direct tensile tests were performed to obtain the stress–strain curves and failure modes of mortar specimens and to establish a formula describing the mortar strain-rate effect. Numerical simulations were then performed using the improved Karagozian and Case concrete models, and the obtained experimental data to clarify the differences in the failure mechanisms of mortar and concrete under dynamic tensile loads. Results showed that concrete had a higher tensile strength but a lower strain-rate effect than mortar. This paper provides an important contribution to study the failure analysis of concrete structures under dynamic loads.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X24001719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X24001719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在中尺度上,混凝土被认为是由石子、砂浆和界面过渡区组成的三相复合材料。尽管砂浆是混凝土的重要组成部分,但其材料参数尚未得到系统确定,通常是通过假设其为混凝土参数的弱化版本来建立模型。因此,准确描述砂浆在混凝土中的作用和混凝土的破坏机理十分困难。通过准静态和动态直接拉伸试验,获得了砂浆试件的应力-应变曲线和破坏模式,并建立了描述砂浆应变率效应的公式。然后,利用改进的 Karagozian 和 Case 混凝土模型以及获得的实验数据进行了数值模拟,以阐明砂浆和混凝土在动态拉伸荷载下的破坏机制差异。结果表明,与砂浆相比,混凝土的抗拉强度更高,但应变速率效应更低。本文为研究动荷载下混凝土结构的破坏分析做出了重要贡献。
Difference in dynamic direct tensile failure mechanism between homogeneous mortar and three-dimensional mesoscopic concrete based on the split Hopkinson tension bar
At the mesoscale, concrete is considered a three-phase composite material comprising stone, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone. Even though mortar is an important component of concrete, its material parameters have not been determined systematically, and they are often modeled by assuming that they are weaker versions of the concrete parameters. Therefore, accurately describing the role of mortar in concrete and the failure mechanism of concrete is difficult. The quasi-static and dynamic direct tensile tests were performed to obtain the stress–strain curves and failure modes of mortar specimens and to establish a formula describing the mortar strain-rate effect. Numerical simulations were then performed using the improved Karagozian and Case concrete models, and the obtained experimental data to clarify the differences in the failure mechanisms of mortar and concrete under dynamic tensile loads. Results showed that concrete had a higher tensile strength but a lower strain-rate effect than mortar. This paper provides an important contribution to study the failure analysis of concrete structures under dynamic loads.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to provide ideas and information involving the use of the finite element method and its variants, both in scientific inquiry and in professional practice. The scope is intentionally broad, encompassing use of the finite element method in engineering as well as the pure and applied sciences. The emphasis of the journal will be the development and use of numerical procedures to solve practical problems, although contributions relating to the mathematical and theoretical foundations and computer implementation of numerical methods are likewise welcomed. Review articles presenting unbiased and comprehensive reviews of state-of-the-art topics will also be accommodated.