意义在眼中:商业模式设计与客户意义创造之间的协调

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Long Range Planning Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102484
Silvia Sanasi , Federico Artusi , Emilio Bellini , Antonio Ghezzi
{"title":"意义在眼中:商业模式设计与客户意义创造之间的协调","authors":"Silvia Sanasi ,&nbsp;Federico Artusi ,&nbsp;Emilio Bellini ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghezzi","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To remain competitive in a shifting sociocultural landscape, firms often introduce new meanings—new reasons why customers use their products or services—that must be embedded into their strategy. However, customers are active participants in value creation processes, rather than passive recipients. This is especially true in services, where value is created in the interaction between provider and consumer. When designing business models, firms must thus consider customers’ meaning-making activities, which are highly subjective and influenced by cultural frames and personal characteristics. Yet, the business model literature has largely overlooked how firms design business models to articulate new meanings and shape customer perceptions. In this study, we explore the role of business model design in determining how firms articulate new meanings that customers subsequently perceive. We present a comparative case study of two store concepts developed by the same entrepreneur, both introducing the same new meanings. Through in-depth interviews with the founder and CEO, in-store observations, and archival data, we analyze their strategy for introducing new meanings. Additionally, we apply topic modeling to online reviews to examine how customers interpreted these new meanings. Our findings suggest that firms can shape customer perceptions of new meanings through business model design, particularly by leveraging value creation mechanisms tied to value delivery. This study enriches the business model design literature and connects it to the innovation of meaning discourse. It also offers practitioners insights into how to use firm strategy to convey intended meanings to customers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"57 6","pages":"Article 102484"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meaning is in the eye of the beholder: Reconciling business model design with customer meaning-making\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Sanasi ,&nbsp;Federico Artusi ,&nbsp;Emilio Bellini ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To remain competitive in a shifting sociocultural landscape, firms often introduce new meanings—new reasons why customers use their products or services—that must be embedded into their strategy. However, customers are active participants in value creation processes, rather than passive recipients. This is especially true in services, where value is created in the interaction between provider and consumer. When designing business models, firms must thus consider customers’ meaning-making activities, which are highly subjective and influenced by cultural frames and personal characteristics. Yet, the business model literature has largely overlooked how firms design business models to articulate new meanings and shape customer perceptions. In this study, we explore the role of business model design in determining how firms articulate new meanings that customers subsequently perceive. We present a comparative case study of two store concepts developed by the same entrepreneur, both introducing the same new meanings. Through in-depth interviews with the founder and CEO, in-store observations, and archival data, we analyze their strategy for introducing new meanings. Additionally, we apply topic modeling to online reviews to examine how customers interpreted these new meanings. Our findings suggest that firms can shape customer perceptions of new meanings through business model design, particularly by leveraging value creation mechanisms tied to value delivery. This study enriches the business model design literature and connects it to the innovation of meaning discourse. It also offers practitioners insights into how to use firm strategy to convey intended meanings to customers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Long Range Planning\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Long Range Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630124000712\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630124000712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在不断变化的社会文化环境中保持竞争力,企业往往会引入新的意义--客户使用其产品或服务的新理由--这些意义必须融入企业的战略之中。然而,客户是价值创造过程的积极参与者,而不是被动的接受者。这一点在服务业尤为明显,因为价值是在服务提供商与消费者之间的互动中创造的。因此,在设计商业模式时,企业必须考虑客户的意义创造活动,这些活动具有高度主观性,并受到文化框架和个人特征的影响。然而,商业模式文献在很大程度上忽视了企业如何通过设计商业模式来表达新的意义和塑造顾客的认知。在本研究中,我们探讨了商业模式设计在决定企业如何表达客户随后感知到的新意义中的作用。我们对同一企业家开发的两个商店概念进行了比较案例研究,这两个概念都引入了相同的新含义。通过对创始人和首席执行官的深入访谈、店内观察和档案数据,我们分析了他们引入新含义的策略。此外,我们还对在线评论进行了主题建模,以研究顾客是如何解释这些新含义的。我们的研究结果表明,企业可以通过商业模式设计,特别是利用与价值交付相关的价值创造机制,来塑造顾客对新含义的认知。这项研究丰富了商业模式设计文献,并将其与意义创新论述联系起来。它还为从业者提供了如何利用企业战略向客户传达预期意义的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meaning is in the eye of the beholder: Reconciling business model design with customer meaning-making
To remain competitive in a shifting sociocultural landscape, firms often introduce new meanings—new reasons why customers use their products or services—that must be embedded into their strategy. However, customers are active participants in value creation processes, rather than passive recipients. This is especially true in services, where value is created in the interaction between provider and consumer. When designing business models, firms must thus consider customers’ meaning-making activities, which are highly subjective and influenced by cultural frames and personal characteristics. Yet, the business model literature has largely overlooked how firms design business models to articulate new meanings and shape customer perceptions. In this study, we explore the role of business model design in determining how firms articulate new meanings that customers subsequently perceive. We present a comparative case study of two store concepts developed by the same entrepreneur, both introducing the same new meanings. Through in-depth interviews with the founder and CEO, in-store observations, and archival data, we analyze their strategy for introducing new meanings. Additionally, we apply topic modeling to online reviews to examine how customers interpreted these new meanings. Our findings suggest that firms can shape customer perceptions of new meanings through business model design, particularly by leveraging value creation mechanisms tied to value delivery. This study enriches the business model design literature and connects it to the innovation of meaning discourse. It also offers practitioners insights into how to use firm strategy to convey intended meanings to customers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.
期刊最新文献
Meaning is in the eye of the beholder: Reconciling business model design with customer meaning-making Too much of a good thing: Addressing the shape of relationship between positive media sentiment and IPO performance Opening up emotionally: How top managers use peripheral actors' emotional expressions during inclusive strategy formulation To attack or not attack? The role of relative status, awareness, and motivation An evolutionary perspective on capabilities for fluid product-markets: The contingent effects of routinization and renewal in marketing, R&D, and operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1