比较柴油和加氢处理植物油作为反应控制压缩点火的高活性燃料

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119264
Jacek Hunicz , Liping Yang , Arkadiusz Rybak , Shuaizhuang Ji , Michał S. Gęca , Maciej Mikulski
{"title":"比较柴油和加氢处理植物油作为反应控制压缩点火的高活性燃料","authors":"Jacek Hunicz ,&nbsp;Liping Yang ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Rybak ,&nbsp;Shuaizhuang Ji ,&nbsp;Michał S. Gęca ,&nbsp;Maciej Mikulski","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) is becoming a widely accepted renewable drop-in alternative fuel to diesel. However, conventional diesel combustion does not fully exploit HVO’s superior physicochemical parameters. Its high cetane index should significantly improve the performance and emission of next-generation, dual-fuel, reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engines. These have a promising future in marine and off-road sectors. This study is the first comprehensive verification of HVO’s benefits towards achieving superior RCCI combustion with natural gas. It used a sophisticated, single-cylinder research engine with a fully controllable air/fuel paths, calibrated in conventional compression ignition mode. The calibration experiments in a corresponding RCCI setpoint covered the cross-sensitivity of high-reactivity fuels (HVO and diesel) to boost pressure, excess air ratio, exhaust gas recirculation and start of injection, investigated at 85 % and 93 % energy-based blending ratios with natural gas. Extensive measurement instrumentation provided combustion and emission characterisation, enabling observations regarding both the phenomenology and applied potential of HVO-activated RCCI. Best performance was observed at the boundary of mixture dilution, restricted by the misfire or combustion variability limits. High reactivity of HVO allows for extending combustion stability limits, enabling increasing both, the local dilution (earlier injection timings) and the global dilution (higher mixture strengths or higher exhaust recirculation ratios). Calibrated along these phenomenological outcomes, HVO and diesel allow achieving efficiency over 2 percentage points superior in RCCI mode, compared to conventional diesel reference. With HVO, RCCI can be calibrated to comfortably meet EPA Tier 4 emission limits in all legislated species, without aftertreatment. Particular merits are in NO<sub>X</sub> reduction, for which the best case HVO-RCCI tested at 0.7 g/kWh vs 2.8 g/kWh of diesel-RCCI. HVO further cuts down methane slip by more than 45 %, while PM emissions for RCCI are generally measured ultra-low. Corresponding conventional diesel reference exceeds the EPA NO<sub>X</sub> and PM limits by respectively 1500 % and 400 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119264"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of diesel and hydrotreated vegetable oil as the high-reactivity fuel in reactivity-controlled compression ignition\",\"authors\":\"Jacek Hunicz ,&nbsp;Liping Yang ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Rybak ,&nbsp;Shuaizhuang Ji ,&nbsp;Michał S. Gęca ,&nbsp;Maciej Mikulski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) is becoming a widely accepted renewable drop-in alternative fuel to diesel. However, conventional diesel combustion does not fully exploit HVO’s superior physicochemical parameters. Its high cetane index should significantly improve the performance and emission of next-generation, dual-fuel, reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engines. These have a promising future in marine and off-road sectors. This study is the first comprehensive verification of HVO’s benefits towards achieving superior RCCI combustion with natural gas. It used a sophisticated, single-cylinder research engine with a fully controllable air/fuel paths, calibrated in conventional compression ignition mode. The calibration experiments in a corresponding RCCI setpoint covered the cross-sensitivity of high-reactivity fuels (HVO and diesel) to boost pressure, excess air ratio, exhaust gas recirculation and start of injection, investigated at 85 % and 93 % energy-based blending ratios with natural gas. Extensive measurement instrumentation provided combustion and emission characterisation, enabling observations regarding both the phenomenology and applied potential of HVO-activated RCCI. Best performance was observed at the boundary of mixture dilution, restricted by the misfire or combustion variability limits. High reactivity of HVO allows for extending combustion stability limits, enabling increasing both, the local dilution (earlier injection timings) and the global dilution (higher mixture strengths or higher exhaust recirculation ratios). Calibrated along these phenomenological outcomes, HVO and diesel allow achieving efficiency over 2 percentage points superior in RCCI mode, compared to conventional diesel reference. With HVO, RCCI can be calibrated to comfortably meet EPA Tier 4 emission limits in all legislated species, without aftertreatment. Particular merits are in NO<sub>X</sub> reduction, for which the best case HVO-RCCI tested at 0.7 g/kWh vs 2.8 g/kWh of diesel-RCCI. HVO further cuts down methane slip by more than 45 %, while PM emissions for RCCI are generally measured ultra-low. Corresponding conventional diesel reference exceeds the EPA NO<sub>X</sub> and PM limits by respectively 1500 % and 400 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424012056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424012056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加氢处理植物油(HVO)正在成为一种广为接受的可再生柴油替代燃料。然而,传统的柴油燃烧并不能充分利用 HVO 优越的物理化学参数。HVO 的十六烷值较高,可以显著改善下一代双燃料反应控制压燃(RCCI)发动机的性能和排放。这些发动机在船舶和非公路领域的应用前景广阔。这项研究首次全面验证了 HVO 在使用天然气实现出色的 RCCI 燃烧方面的优势。它使用了一台精密的单缸研究发动机,该发动机具有完全可控的空气/燃料路径,并在传统压燃模式下进行了校准。在相应的 RCCI 设定点中进行的校准实验涵盖了高活性燃料(高纯度液化石油气和柴油)对增压压力、过量空气比率、废气再循环和喷射启动的交叉敏感性,在天然气的能量混合比为 85% 和 93% 时进行了研究。广泛的测量仪器提供了燃烧和排放特征,使我们能够观察到 HVO 激活 RCCI 的现象和应用潜力。在混合物稀释的边界观察到了最佳性能,但受到失火或燃烧变化极限的限制。高纯氧化物的高反应性允许扩大燃烧稳定性极限,从而提高局部稀释(更早的喷射时间)和整体稀释(更高的混合气强度或更高的排气再循环比率)。根据这些现象结果进行校准,与传统柴油机相比,HVO 和柴油机在 RCCI 模式下的效率可提高 2 个百分点以上。使用 HVO,RCCI 可以在不进行后处理的情况下,轻松满足美国环保署(EPA)对所有法定种类的第 4 级排放限制。最佳情况下,HVO-RCCI 的测试结果为 0.7 克/千瓦时,而柴油-RCCI 为 2.8 克/千瓦时。HVO 进一步将甲烷滑移量减少了 45% 以上,而 RCCI 的 PM 排放量一般都测得超低。相应的传统柴油机的氮氧化物和可吸入颗粒物排放分别超出 EPA 限制的 1500 % 和 400 %。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of diesel and hydrotreated vegetable oil as the high-reactivity fuel in reactivity-controlled compression ignition
Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) is becoming a widely accepted renewable drop-in alternative fuel to diesel. However, conventional diesel combustion does not fully exploit HVO’s superior physicochemical parameters. Its high cetane index should significantly improve the performance and emission of next-generation, dual-fuel, reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engines. These have a promising future in marine and off-road sectors. This study is the first comprehensive verification of HVO’s benefits towards achieving superior RCCI combustion with natural gas. It used a sophisticated, single-cylinder research engine with a fully controllable air/fuel paths, calibrated in conventional compression ignition mode. The calibration experiments in a corresponding RCCI setpoint covered the cross-sensitivity of high-reactivity fuels (HVO and diesel) to boost pressure, excess air ratio, exhaust gas recirculation and start of injection, investigated at 85 % and 93 % energy-based blending ratios with natural gas. Extensive measurement instrumentation provided combustion and emission characterisation, enabling observations regarding both the phenomenology and applied potential of HVO-activated RCCI. Best performance was observed at the boundary of mixture dilution, restricted by the misfire or combustion variability limits. High reactivity of HVO allows for extending combustion stability limits, enabling increasing both, the local dilution (earlier injection timings) and the global dilution (higher mixture strengths or higher exhaust recirculation ratios). Calibrated along these phenomenological outcomes, HVO and diesel allow achieving efficiency over 2 percentage points superior in RCCI mode, compared to conventional diesel reference. With HVO, RCCI can be calibrated to comfortably meet EPA Tier 4 emission limits in all legislated species, without aftertreatment. Particular merits are in NOX reduction, for which the best case HVO-RCCI tested at 0.7 g/kWh vs 2.8 g/kWh of diesel-RCCI. HVO further cuts down methane slip by more than 45 %, while PM emissions for RCCI are generally measured ultra-low. Corresponding conventional diesel reference exceeds the EPA NOX and PM limits by respectively 1500 % and 400 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Performance and feasibility assessment of an adsorptive-dehumidification system utilizing a heat pipe-based desiccant-coated heat exchanger Cylindrical near-field solar thermophotovoltaic system with multilayer absorber/emitter structures: Integrated solar radiation absorption and cooling energy consumption Transportation and process modelling-assisted techno-economic assessment of resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste Municipal solid waste thermochemical conversion to substitute natural gas: Comparative techno-economic analysis between updraft gasification and chemical looping Improved numerical modeling of photovoltaic double skin façades with spectral considerations: Methods and investigations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1