{"title":"人工神经网络与多线性回归在预测反向运动跳跃高度中的性能比较","authors":"Amirhossein Emamian , Alireza Hashemi Oskouei , Kristof Kipp , Rasoul Azreh","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has used primarily linear regression models to predict jump height and establish contributors of performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-linear regression (MLR) in prediction of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and investigating the contribution of kinematic variables to CMJ performance. Thirty-four healthy young male athletes performed a total of 204 CMJ while eight kinematic variables (the hip, knee, and ankle angles at the begging of the concentric phase of CMJ, the hip and knee take-off angles, and the shoulder, hip, and knee maximum angular velocities) were used as inputs to ANN and MLR to predict CMJ height. The correlation coefficients between the jump height and the predicted value by the developed models indicated that ANN predict CMJ height better than MLR (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.68 compared to <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.44). Moreover, the root mean squared error of prediction showed better performance of the ANN rather than the MLR (4.8 cm compared to 5.3 cm). The shoulder and hip maximum angular velocities were the most important contributors, and then the hip and knee take-off angles contributed to CMJ height. In conclusion, implementing ANN to identify key variables of performance may also be relevant for other sport skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 2211-2217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of artificial neural network compared to multi-linear regression in prediction of countermovement jump height\",\"authors\":\"Amirhossein Emamian , Alireza Hashemi Oskouei , Kristof Kipp , Rasoul Azreh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous research has used primarily linear regression models to predict jump height and establish contributors of performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-linear regression (MLR) in prediction of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and investigating the contribution of kinematic variables to CMJ performance. Thirty-four healthy young male athletes performed a total of 204 CMJ while eight kinematic variables (the hip, knee, and ankle angles at the begging of the concentric phase of CMJ, the hip and knee take-off angles, and the shoulder, hip, and knee maximum angular velocities) were used as inputs to ANN and MLR to predict CMJ height. The correlation coefficients between the jump height and the predicted value by the developed models indicated that ANN predict CMJ height better than MLR (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.68 compared to <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.44). Moreover, the root mean squared error of prediction showed better performance of the ANN rather than the MLR (4.8 cm compared to 5.3 cm). The shoulder and hip maximum angular velocities were the most important contributors, and then the hip and knee take-off angles contributed to CMJ height. In conclusion, implementing ANN to identify key variables of performance may also be relevant for other sport skills.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 2211-2217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of artificial neural network compared to multi-linear regression in prediction of countermovement jump height
Previous research has used primarily linear regression models to predict jump height and establish contributors of performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-linear regression (MLR) in prediction of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and investigating the contribution of kinematic variables to CMJ performance. Thirty-four healthy young male athletes performed a total of 204 CMJ while eight kinematic variables (the hip, knee, and ankle angles at the begging of the concentric phase of CMJ, the hip and knee take-off angles, and the shoulder, hip, and knee maximum angular velocities) were used as inputs to ANN and MLR to predict CMJ height. The correlation coefficients between the jump height and the predicted value by the developed models indicated that ANN predict CMJ height better than MLR (R2 = 0.68 compared to R2 = 0.44). Moreover, the root mean squared error of prediction showed better performance of the ANN rather than the MLR (4.8 cm compared to 5.3 cm). The shoulder and hip maximum angular velocities were the most important contributors, and then the hip and knee take-off angles contributed to CMJ height. In conclusion, implementing ANN to identify key variables of performance may also be relevant for other sport skills.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina