Exergy efficiency improvement by compression heat recovery for an integrated natural gas liquefaction-CO2 capture-NGL recovery process

For liquefied natual gas production, cryogenic distillation offers lower thermal energy consumption and a more compact footprint for carbon capture unit than the widely used chemical absorption. However, the reduction in thermal energy consumption comes at the cost of increased power consumption. To reduce the power consumption of cryogenic distillation based natural gas lqiuefaction plants, an integrated process for liquefied natual gas production, cryogenic CO₂ capture and natural gas liquids recovery is proposed, which is called the base process. This base process is further integrated with a heat recovery unit (Organic Rankine cycle or Kalina cycle) to investigate the optimal utilization of compression heat in the system. The proposed processes are modeled in Aspen HYSYS and optimized using a genetic algorithm installed in Matlab. The results show that specific power consumption of the base case is 0.385 kWh/Nm³ NG. Due to the lack of compression heat recovery, significant exergy loss occurs at the water coolers, accounting for approximately 37 % of the total system exergy destruction. Among the evaluated methods, the supercritical Organic Rankine cycle, using R1234ze as the working fluid, recovers approximately 60 % of the exergy from compression heat with an 8.7 % improvement in system exergy efficiency. The subcritical Organic Rankine cycle, using R600a as the working fluid, achieves a slightly lower exergy efficiency improvement of 7.1 %. The Kalina cycle, while less efficient, still improves the system’s exergy efficiency by 6.3 %. Economic analysis reveals that the total annualized cost of the base process is $8,441,416, with a levelized cost of $0.1411/kg. The subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle provides the most cost-effective solution, with the lowest total annualized cost of $8,305,154 and a levelized cost of $0.1402/kg. The Kalina cycle ranks second in cost-effectiveness, with a total annualized cost of $8,345,914 and a levelized cost of $0.1405/kg NG. Although the supercritical ORC requires the highest capital investment, it proves more cost-effective than the base process due to its reduced annual operating costs.