不同类型正畸托槽和钢丝上的微生物附着力:体外研究

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Saudi Dental Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.004
Huda Abutayyem , Mahra Abdullatif Alshehhi , Maha Alameri , Muhammad Sohail Zafar
{"title":"不同类型正畸托槽和钢丝上的微生物附着力:体外研究","authors":"Huda Abutayyem ,&nbsp;Mahra Abdullatif Alshehhi ,&nbsp;Maha Alameri ,&nbsp;Muhammad Sohail Zafar","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to compare the microbial adhesion of different oral pathogens on different wires used in orthodontic treatment and to evaluate the potential of these pathogens to form biofilms on different types of orthodontic wires and brackets.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this in vitro investigation, we calculated that the sample size for each group (i.e., those with brackets [metal braces, ceramic braces, and self-ligating braces] and wires [nickel titanium, titanium molybdenum, and stainless steel]) should be 15 individuals. Five types of microbes (<em>Streptococcus mutans</em>, <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em>, <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, and <em>Candida albicans</em>) were used. Three types of brackets and three types of wires were used with five types of bacteria, and the process was repeated three times to collect the average.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in the mean concentrations of bacteria in the different brackets (p &gt; 0.05) or in the mean concentrations in the different orthodontic materials used in these brackets. In contrast, there were considerable differences between the concentrations of bacteria in the wires and those in the brackets (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Different wires and brackets have different associations with bacterial adhesion and concentration. The wires exhibited more substantial biofilm absorbance and concentrations than the brackets. The adhesion of biofilm may be a decisive factor when choosing a type of orthodontic wire, particularly for individuals at high risk of developing bacterial oral diseases, such as periodontal diseases and dental caries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"36 11","pages":"Pages 1459-1465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial adhesion on different types of orthodontic brackets and wires: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Huda Abutayyem ,&nbsp;Mahra Abdullatif Alshehhi ,&nbsp;Maha Alameri ,&nbsp;Muhammad Sohail Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to compare the microbial adhesion of different oral pathogens on different wires used in orthodontic treatment and to evaluate the potential of these pathogens to form biofilms on different types of orthodontic wires and brackets.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this in vitro investigation, we calculated that the sample size for each group (i.e., those with brackets [metal braces, ceramic braces, and self-ligating braces] and wires [nickel titanium, titanium molybdenum, and stainless steel]) should be 15 individuals. Five types of microbes (<em>Streptococcus mutans</em>, <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em>, <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, and <em>Candida albicans</em>) were used. Three types of brackets and three types of wires were used with five types of bacteria, and the process was repeated three times to collect the average.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in the mean concentrations of bacteria in the different brackets (p &gt; 0.05) or in the mean concentrations in the different orthodontic materials used in these brackets. In contrast, there were considerable differences between the concentrations of bacteria in the wires and those in the brackets (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Different wires and brackets have different associations with bacterial adhesion and concentration. The wires exhibited more substantial biofilm absorbance and concentrations than the brackets. The adhesion of biofilm may be a decisive factor when choosing a type of orthodontic wire, particularly for individuals at high risk of developing bacterial oral diseases, such as periodontal diseases and dental caries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1459-1465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224002566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224002566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同口腔病原体在正畸治疗中使用的不同钢丝上的微生物粘附性,并评估这些病原体在不同类型的正畸钢丝和托槽上形成生物膜的可能性、金属矫治器、陶瓷矫治器和自锁式矫治器)和钢丝(镍钛、钛钼和不锈钢)的样本量应为 15 人。使用了五种微生物(变异链球菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌)。结果在不同托槽中细菌的平均浓度(p> 0.05)或在这些托槽中使用的不同正畸材料中细菌的平均浓度方面没有观察到显著差异。结论不同的钢丝和托槽与细菌的粘附和浓度有不同的关系。与托槽相比,钢丝表现出更高的生物膜吸收率和浓度。在选择正畸钢丝类型时,生物膜的附着力可能是一个决定性的因素,尤其是对于罹患细菌性口腔疾病(如牙周病和龋齿)的高风险人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbial adhesion on different types of orthodontic brackets and wires: An in vitro study

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the microbial adhesion of different oral pathogens on different wires used in orthodontic treatment and to evaluate the potential of these pathogens to form biofilms on different types of orthodontic wires and brackets.

Methods

In this in vitro investigation, we calculated that the sample size for each group (i.e., those with brackets [metal braces, ceramic braces, and self-ligating braces] and wires [nickel titanium, titanium molybdenum, and stainless steel]) should be 15 individuals. Five types of microbes (Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans) were used. Three types of brackets and three types of wires were used with five types of bacteria, and the process was repeated three times to collect the average.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the mean concentrations of bacteria in the different brackets (p > 0.05) or in the mean concentrations in the different orthodontic materials used in these brackets. In contrast, there were considerable differences between the concentrations of bacteria in the wires and those in the brackets (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Different wires and brackets have different associations with bacterial adhesion and concentration. The wires exhibited more substantial biofilm absorbance and concentrations than the brackets. The adhesion of biofilm may be a decisive factor when choosing a type of orthodontic wire, particularly for individuals at high risk of developing bacterial oral diseases, such as periodontal diseases and dental caries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Assessing the quality of AI information from ChatGPT regarding oral surgery, preventive dentistry, and oral cancer: An exploration study An in vitro study of fluoride-preloaded halloysite nanotubes to enhance the fluoride release in conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements Association between dental diseases and stroke Drug delivery systems in periodontitis: A visualization and bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1