后张耦合梁:力学、循环响应和损伤评估

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109082
Abouzar Jafari , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Sepideh Pourshamsian , Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar , Ying Zhou
{"title":"后张耦合梁:力学、循环响应和损伤评估","authors":"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Sepideh Pourshamsian ,&nbsp;Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the influence of axial load ratio, initial prestressing ratio, and aspect ratio on the cyclic performance of post-tensioned coupling beams. An analytical solution was derived and verified against experimental studies conducted on post-tensioned beams and a comprehensive numerical parametric analysis was conducted, examining fifty-one scenarios with varying design parameters. These scenarios incorporated three key parameters: the beams’ aspect ratio (span to height), ranging from 1.5 to 3.5; the axial load ratio, ranging from 0.04 to 0.175; and the initial prestressing ratio, ranging from 0.35 to 0.65. Increasing the axial load ratio led to more severe damage, while higher aspect and initial prestressing ratios reduced damage. The axial load ratio had the greatest effect on damage severity, while the aspect ratio mainly influenced the size and length of crushed regions at the beam corners. Deeper post-tensioned coupling beams (aspect ratio &lt;2.5) showed higher coupling shear forces. Increasing the axial load ratio significantly boosted shear capacity, while a higher initial prestressing ratio slightly reduced it. Additionally, both a higher axial load ratio and aspect ratio increased ultimate beam chord rotation, whereas higher initial prestressing ratios decrease it. The estimated stiffness factor, ranging from 0.04 to 0.4, decreased with smaller aspect ratios. Both axial load and initial prestressing ratios had a similar influence on the stiffness factor. A smaller axial load ratio reduced beam-wall interaction and lowered the stiffness ratio, while increasing the initial prestressing ratio raised compressive stress at beam corners, leading to higher initial stiffness and a larger effective moment of inertia. These estimated stiffness factors were then used to derive a relation for the design of post-tensioned coupling beams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 109082"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-tensioned coupling beams: Mechanics, cyclic response, and damage evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Sepideh Pourshamsian ,&nbsp;Habib Akbarzadeh Bengar ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the influence of axial load ratio, initial prestressing ratio, and aspect ratio on the cyclic performance of post-tensioned coupling beams. An analytical solution was derived and verified against experimental studies conducted on post-tensioned beams and a comprehensive numerical parametric analysis was conducted, examining fifty-one scenarios with varying design parameters. These scenarios incorporated three key parameters: the beams’ aspect ratio (span to height), ranging from 1.5 to 3.5; the axial load ratio, ranging from 0.04 to 0.175; and the initial prestressing ratio, ranging from 0.35 to 0.65. Increasing the axial load ratio led to more severe damage, while higher aspect and initial prestressing ratios reduced damage. The axial load ratio had the greatest effect on damage severity, while the aspect ratio mainly influenced the size and length of crushed regions at the beam corners. Deeper post-tensioned coupling beams (aspect ratio &lt;2.5) showed higher coupling shear forces. Increasing the axial load ratio significantly boosted shear capacity, while a higher initial prestressing ratio slightly reduced it. Additionally, both a higher axial load ratio and aspect ratio increased ultimate beam chord rotation, whereas higher initial prestressing ratios decrease it. The estimated stiffness factor, ranging from 0.04 to 0.4, decreased with smaller aspect ratios. Both axial load and initial prestressing ratios had a similar influence on the stiffness factor. A smaller axial load ratio reduced beam-wall interaction and lowered the stiffness ratio, while increasing the initial prestressing ratio raised compressive stress at beam corners, leading to higher initial stiffness and a larger effective moment of inertia. These estimated stiffness factors were then used to derive a relation for the design of post-tensioned coupling beams.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124006341\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124006341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了轴向荷载比、初始预应力比和长宽比对后张法耦合梁循环性能的影响。根据对后张梁进行的实验研究,得出并验证了一个分析解决方案,并进行了全面的数值参数分析,研究了 51 种设计参数不同的情况。这些方案包含三个关键参数:梁的长宽比(跨度与高度),从 1.5 到 3.5 不等;轴向荷载比,从 0.04 到 0.175 不等;初始预应力比,从 0.35 到 0.65 不等。提高轴向荷载比会导致更严重的损坏,而提高纵横比和初始预应力比则会减少损坏。轴向荷载比对损坏严重程度的影响最大,而纵横比则主要影响梁角破碎区域的大小和长度。较深的后张法耦合梁(纵横比为 2.5)显示出较高的耦合剪力。增加轴向荷载比可显著提高剪切承载力,而增加初始预应力比则会略微降低剪切承载力。此外,较高的轴向荷载比和高宽比都会增加梁的极限弦线旋转,而较高的初始预应力比则会降低极限弦线旋转。估计的刚度系数从 0.04 到 0.4 不等,随着纵横比的减小而减小。轴向荷载和初始预应力比对刚度系数的影响相似。较小的轴向荷载比减少了梁与墙的相互作用,降低了刚度比,而增加初始预应力比则提高了梁角处的压应力,导致较高的初始刚度和较大的有效惯性矩。这些估计的刚度系数随后被用于推导后张法耦合梁的设计关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-tensioned coupling beams: Mechanics, cyclic response, and damage evaluation
This study investigates the influence of axial load ratio, initial prestressing ratio, and aspect ratio on the cyclic performance of post-tensioned coupling beams. An analytical solution was derived and verified against experimental studies conducted on post-tensioned beams and a comprehensive numerical parametric analysis was conducted, examining fifty-one scenarios with varying design parameters. These scenarios incorporated three key parameters: the beams’ aspect ratio (span to height), ranging from 1.5 to 3.5; the axial load ratio, ranging from 0.04 to 0.175; and the initial prestressing ratio, ranging from 0.35 to 0.65. Increasing the axial load ratio led to more severe damage, while higher aspect and initial prestressing ratios reduced damage. The axial load ratio had the greatest effect on damage severity, while the aspect ratio mainly influenced the size and length of crushed regions at the beam corners. Deeper post-tensioned coupling beams (aspect ratio <2.5) showed higher coupling shear forces. Increasing the axial load ratio significantly boosted shear capacity, while a higher initial prestressing ratio slightly reduced it. Additionally, both a higher axial load ratio and aspect ratio increased ultimate beam chord rotation, whereas higher initial prestressing ratios decrease it. The estimated stiffness factor, ranging from 0.04 to 0.4, decreased with smaller aspect ratios. Both axial load and initial prestressing ratios had a similar influence on the stiffness factor. A smaller axial load ratio reduced beam-wall interaction and lowered the stiffness ratio, while increasing the initial prestressing ratio raised compressive stress at beam corners, leading to higher initial stiffness and a larger effective moment of inertia. These estimated stiffness factors were then used to derive a relation for the design of post-tensioned coupling beams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the static and dynamic behavior characteristics of biopolymer-treated soil at varying moisture contents Knowledge structure and research progress in earthquake-induced liquefaction assessment from 2000 to 2023: A scientometric analysis incorporating domain knowledge A novel physics-constrained neural network: An illustration of ground motion models Investigation of dynamic responses of slopes in various anchor cable failure modes Post-tensioned coupling beams: Mechanics, cyclic response, and damage evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1