基于传感器的丹麦人工沼泽泥炭厚度测绘

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117091
Diana Vigah Adetsu , Triven Koganti , Rasmus Jes Petersen , Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen , Dominik Zak , Mogens Humlekrog Greve , Amélie Beucher
{"title":"基于传感器的丹麦人工沼泽泥炭厚度测绘","authors":"Diana Vigah Adetsu ,&nbsp;Triven Koganti ,&nbsp;Rasmus Jes Petersen ,&nbsp;Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen ,&nbsp;Dominik Zak ,&nbsp;Mogens Humlekrog Greve ,&nbsp;Amélie Beucher","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and EC<sub>a</sub> covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a<!--> <!-->coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or EC<sub>a</sub> covariates were the least accurate, especially for the EC<sub>a</sub>-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"452 ","pages":"Article 117091"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensor-based peat thickness mapping of a cultivated bog in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Diana Vigah Adetsu ,&nbsp;Triven Koganti ,&nbsp;Rasmus Jes Petersen ,&nbsp;Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen ,&nbsp;Dominik Zak ,&nbsp;Mogens Humlekrog Greve ,&nbsp;Amélie Beucher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and EC<sub>a</sub> covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a<!--> <!-->coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or EC<sub>a</sub> covariates were the least accurate, especially for the EC<sub>a</sub>-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"452 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124003203\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124003203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抽干泥炭地用于农业会使其变成重要的碳(C)来源。人们日益认识到,恢复排水泥炭地是减少陆地温室气体排放的气候行动战略。恢复工作通常需要泥炭厚度(PT)等准确输入数据,以估算和监测碳储量;然而,这些数据往往缺乏或精度不高。在这项研究中,利用量子随机森林算法,将近距离电磁感应(EMI)勘测得出的表观电导率(ECa)和基于激光雷达的数字高程模型得出的地形变量作为协变量,分别或合并进行评估,以绘制农业沼泽的泥炭厚度图。针对大面积(308 公顷)和小面积(42 公顷)的 EMI 勘测区域分别训练了局部模型,而全局模型则结合了两个区域的数据,进行了全面的现场分析。根据反演拖曳瞬变电磁(tTEM)数据中的电阻率变化对地下进行了特征描述。结果表明,结合地形和导电率协变因素,全局模型的 PT 预测精度最高,决定系数为 0.61,归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)为 0.10。最佳大面积局部模型的准确度低于前者(归一化均方根误差为 0.18),而最佳小面积局部模型(归一化均方根误差为 0.11)则优于最佳全局模型。仅使用地形或ECa协变量训练的模型准确度最低,尤其是仅使用ECa的模型。tTEM 结果显示了一个异质地点,其特点是在粘土、沙和盐碱白垩的冰川后沉积层上覆盖着一层薄薄的电阻泥炭层。我们的研究结果表明,表层和地下属性的协变量对于精确绘制PT图至关重要,可为退化泥炭地的土地利用规划和恢复措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensor-based peat thickness mapping of a cultivated bog in Denmark
Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and ECa covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or ECa covariates were the least accurate, especially for the ECa-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal soil water origins and determinants in an alpine hillslope on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Low-severity wildfire prevents catastrophic impacts on fungal communities and soil carbon stability in a fire-affected Douglas-fir ecosystem Thermogravimetric data suggest synergy between different organic fractions and clay in soil structure formation Rhizodeposition stimulates soil carbon decomposition and promotes formation of mineral-associated carbon with increased clay content Mycorrhizal and nutrient controls of carbon sequestration in tropical rainforest soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1