{"title":"基于传感器的丹麦人工沼泽泥炭厚度测绘","authors":"Diana Vigah Adetsu , Triven Koganti , Rasmus Jes Petersen , Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen , Dominik Zak , Mogens Humlekrog Greve , Amélie Beucher","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and EC<sub>a</sub> covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a<!--> <!-->coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or EC<sub>a</sub> covariates were the least accurate, especially for the EC<sub>a</sub>-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"452 ","pages":"Article 117091"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensor-based peat thickness mapping of a cultivated bog in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Diana Vigah Adetsu , Triven Koganti , Rasmus Jes Petersen , Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen , Dominik Zak , Mogens Humlekrog Greve , Amélie Beucher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and EC<sub>a</sub> covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a<!--> <!-->coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or EC<sub>a</sub> covariates were the least accurate, especially for the EC<sub>a</sub>-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"452 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124003203\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124003203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensor-based peat thickness mapping of a cultivated bog in Denmark
Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and ECa covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or ECa covariates were the least accurate, especially for the ECa-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.
期刊介绍:
Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.