{"title":"利用颈部淋巴结超声图像的纹理分析区分口腔上颌龈鳞癌的转移与非转移","authors":"Yusuke Kawashima , Aya Hagimoto , Hiroshi Abe , Masaaki Miyakoshi , Yoshihiro Kawabata , Hiroko Indo , Tatsurou Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Object</h3><div>To differentiate between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma, textural analysis of these lymph nodes in ultrasound images was performed in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty five metastatic neck nodes and 28 non-metastatic neck nodes were enrolled in this study. Seventy eight texture characteristics were retrieved from the US images using the LIFEx software.</div><div>The Mann Whitney U test was measurably utilized to survey on the off chance that there was a measurably noteworthy distinction within the textural characteristics between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes. The capacity of the surface highlights to recognize between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes was illustrated utilizing the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis curves (ROC). Youden's J statistic was used to determine the cut-off positions in each ROC curve that maximized sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Zone size non uniformity (ZSNU) highlight appeared the foremost noteworthy contrast between these nodes (p < 0.001).</div><div>Strength had Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811, specificity of 0.821 and sensitivity of 0.8, when measured at the cutoff value of 896.344.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results come about uncovered that quality highlight may be the finest surface highlight to distinguish from non-metastatic neck nodes and to anticipate metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using texture analysis of ultrasonography images of neck lymph nodes to differentiate metastasis to non-metastasis in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Kawashima , Aya Hagimoto , Hiroshi Abe , Masaaki Miyakoshi , Yoshihiro Kawabata , Hiroko Indo , Tatsurou Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Object</h3><div>To differentiate between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma, textural analysis of these lymph nodes in ultrasound images was performed in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty five metastatic neck nodes and 28 non-metastatic neck nodes were enrolled in this study. Seventy eight texture characteristics were retrieved from the US images using the LIFEx software.</div><div>The Mann Whitney U test was measurably utilized to survey on the off chance that there was a measurably noteworthy distinction within the textural characteristics between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes. The capacity of the surface highlights to recognize between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes was illustrated utilizing the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis curves (ROC). Youden's J statistic was used to determine the cut-off positions in each ROC curve that maximized sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Zone size non uniformity (ZSNU) highlight appeared the foremost noteworthy contrast between these nodes (p < 0.001).</div><div>Strength had Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811, specificity of 0.821 and sensitivity of 0.8, when measured at the cutoff value of 896.344.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results come about uncovered that quality highlight may be the finest surface highlight to distinguish from non-metastatic neck nodes and to anticipate metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 70-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824001431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824001431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了区分口腔上颌牙龈鳞状细胞癌的转移性颈部淋巴结和非转移性颈部淋巴结,本研究对这些淋巴结的超声图像进行了纹理分析。使用 LIFEx 软件从超声图像中提取了 78 个纹理特征。采用 Mann Whitney U 检验来调查转移性颈部结节和非转移性颈部结节的纹理特征是否存在显著差异。利用接收者操作特性分析曲线(ROC)说明了表面亮点识别转移性颈部结节和非转移性颈部结节的能力。结果Zone size non uniformity (ZSNU) 高亮显示出这些结节之间最显著的对比(p < 0.001),强度曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.811,特异性为 0.结论我们的研究结果发现,质量高亮度可能是区分非转移性颈部结节和预测口腔上颌龈鳞癌转移性颈部结节的最佳表面高亮度。
Using texture analysis of ultrasonography images of neck lymph nodes to differentiate metastasis to non-metastasis in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma
Object
To differentiate between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma, textural analysis of these lymph nodes in ultrasound images was performed in this study.
Methods
Twenty five metastatic neck nodes and 28 non-metastatic neck nodes were enrolled in this study. Seventy eight texture characteristics were retrieved from the US images using the LIFEx software.
The Mann Whitney U test was measurably utilized to survey on the off chance that there was a measurably noteworthy distinction within the textural characteristics between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes. The capacity of the surface highlights to recognize between metastatic neck nodes and non-metastatic neck nodes was illustrated utilizing the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis curves (ROC). Youden's J statistic was used to determine the cut-off positions in each ROC curve that maximized sensitivity and specificity.
Results
Zone size non uniformity (ZSNU) highlight appeared the foremost noteworthy contrast between these nodes (p < 0.001).
Strength had Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811, specificity of 0.821 and sensitivity of 0.8, when measured at the cutoff value of 896.344.
Conclusions
Our results come about uncovered that quality highlight may be the finest surface highlight to distinguish from non-metastatic neck nodes and to anticipate metastatic neck nodes in oral maxillary gingival squamous cell carcinoma.