标准化与标准:技术主权的保障?

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123873
Knut Blind
{"title":"标准化与标准:技术主权的保障?","authors":"Knut Blind","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technological sovereignty has gained significant relevance for the geopolitical relations during the Covid-19 pandemic, initially triggered by the trade conflicts in particular between the U.S. and China and now even further fired by the Russian attack of the Ukraine. Consequently, policy measures have been discussed to achieve technological sovereignty. Despite the growing relevance of standardization, their opportunities have only to a limited extent been considered an effective policy instrument to secure or even achieve technological sovereignty. Based on a review of the literature, the mechanism of standardization and standards as safeguards for technological sovereignty are elaborated. We offer a list of propositions to be tested in future studies. Using mobile communication standardization to illustrate its specific characteristics including its development process, we elaborate on the effectiveness of the various safeguard mechanism. Finally, policy implications are derived for the various mechanisms. The paper ends with challenges for standardization and standards to achieve or assure technological sovereignty in the future geopolitical contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 123873"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty?\",\"authors\":\"Knut Blind\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technological sovereignty has gained significant relevance for the geopolitical relations during the Covid-19 pandemic, initially triggered by the trade conflicts in particular between the U.S. and China and now even further fired by the Russian attack of the Ukraine. Consequently, policy measures have been discussed to achieve technological sovereignty. Despite the growing relevance of standardization, their opportunities have only to a limited extent been considered an effective policy instrument to secure or even achieve technological sovereignty. Based on a review of the literature, the mechanism of standardization and standards as safeguards for technological sovereignty are elaborated. We offer a list of propositions to be tested in future studies. Using mobile communication standardization to illustrate its specific characteristics including its development process, we elaborate on the effectiveness of the various safeguard mechanism. Finally, policy implications are derived for the various mechanisms. The paper ends with challenges for standardization and standards to achieve or assure technological sovereignty in the future geopolitical contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006711\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006711","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科维德-19 大流行病期间,技术主权对地缘政治关系具有重要意义,最初是由中美之间的贸易冲突引发的,现在又因俄罗斯对乌克兰的攻击而进一步升温。因此,人们开始讨论实现技术主权的政策措施。尽管标准化的重要性与日俱增,但其机遇仅在有限程度上被视为确保甚至实现技术主权的有效政策工具。在回顾文献的基础上,我们阐述了标准化和标准作为技术主权保障的机制。我们提出了一系列有待未来研究检验的命题。通过移动通信标准化来说明其具体特点,包括其发展过程,我们阐述了各种保障机制的有效性。最后,得出了各种机制的政策含义。本文最后提出了在未来地缘政治背景下实现或确保技术主权的标准化和标准所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty?
Technological sovereignty has gained significant relevance for the geopolitical relations during the Covid-19 pandemic, initially triggered by the trade conflicts in particular between the U.S. and China and now even further fired by the Russian attack of the Ukraine. Consequently, policy measures have been discussed to achieve technological sovereignty. Despite the growing relevance of standardization, their opportunities have only to a limited extent been considered an effective policy instrument to secure or even achieve technological sovereignty. Based on a review of the literature, the mechanism of standardization and standards as safeguards for technological sovereignty are elaborated. We offer a list of propositions to be tested in future studies. Using mobile communication standardization to illustrate its specific characteristics including its development process, we elaborate on the effectiveness of the various safeguard mechanism. Finally, policy implications are derived for the various mechanisms. The paper ends with challenges for standardization and standards to achieve or assure technological sovereignty in the future geopolitical contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1