可再生能源丰富的电力批发市场的表现,以及大量的能源储存和灵活性

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108026
Yimin Zhang, Dominic Davis, Michael J. Brear, Andrea Vecchi
{"title":"可再生能源丰富的电力批发市场的表现,以及大量的能源储存和灵活性","authors":"Yimin Zhang,&nbsp;Dominic Davis,&nbsp;Michael J. Brear,&nbsp;Andrea Vecchi","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work investigates the technical and financial performance of deeply decarbonised wholesale electricity markets with uncertain variable renewable generation (VRG), uncertain demand and different types of flexibility. It first finds that different combinations of power reserves (i.e. power generation capacity) and energy reserves (i.e. energy storage capacity), can achieve adequate system reliability at similar total costs. However, use of only energy reserves never achieved adequate system reliability, and this looks to be a fundamental challenge to the reliability of systems with only energy reserves but no power reserves. Two independent aspects of wholesale market operations are then found to be the main determinants of system reliability: the length of the unit commitment (UC) schedule <em>prior to dispatch</em> and the degree of operational uncertainty of VRG <em>during dispatch</em>.</div><div>It is then argued that reliable, least cost and efficient wholesale markets with dominant renewables need acceptably low levels of operational uncertainty of VRG, sufficient flexibility in generation and/or demand, and UC schedules that are significantly longer than the longest energy storage durations present. Rather than suggesting that innovation in market design is required, these results therefore suggest that different technical approaches should have important, future roles. These include mitigating the operational uncertainty of VRG via several potential means as well as flexible generation, battery storage of a few hours duration and flexible electrolysis. Long duration energy storage, however, may challenge market performance and all participants’ returns even if it supports system reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 108026"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Yimin Zhang,&nbsp;Dominic Davis,&nbsp;Michael J. Brear,&nbsp;Andrea Vecchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work investigates the technical and financial performance of deeply decarbonised wholesale electricity markets with uncertain variable renewable generation (VRG), uncertain demand and different types of flexibility. It first finds that different combinations of power reserves (i.e. power generation capacity) and energy reserves (i.e. energy storage capacity), can achieve adequate system reliability at similar total costs. However, use of only energy reserves never achieved adequate system reliability, and this looks to be a fundamental challenge to the reliability of systems with only energy reserves but no power reserves. Two independent aspects of wholesale market operations are then found to be the main determinants of system reliability: the length of the unit commitment (UC) schedule <em>prior to dispatch</em> and the degree of operational uncertainty of VRG <em>during dispatch</em>.</div><div>It is then argued that reliable, least cost and efficient wholesale markets with dominant renewables need acceptably low levels of operational uncertainty of VRG, sufficient flexibility in generation and/or demand, and UC schedules that are significantly longer than the longest energy storage durations present. Rather than suggesting that innovation in market design is required, these results therefore suggest that different technical approaches should have important, future roles. These include mitigating the operational uncertainty of VRG via several potential means as well as flexible generation, battery storage of a few hours duration and flexible electrolysis. Long duration energy storage, however, may challenge market performance and all participants’ returns even if it supports system reliability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007357\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究探讨了具有不确定可再生能源发电(VRG)、不确定需求和不同类型灵活性的深度去碳化电力批发市场的技术和财务表现。研究首先发现,电力储备(即发电能力)和能源储备(即储能能力)的不同组合可以在总成本相近的情况下实现足够的系统可靠性。然而,仅使用能量储备从未实现过足够的系统可靠性,这看起来是对仅使用能量储备而不使用电力储备的系统可靠性的根本性挑战。批发市场运营的两个独立方面被认为是系统可靠性的主要决定因素:调度前机组承诺(UC)计划的长度和调度期间可再生能源发电机组运行的不确定性程度。因此,与其说这些结果表明市场设计需要创新,不如说不同的技术方法在未来应发挥重要作用。这些方法包括通过几种潜在的方式减轻可变蓄能发电机的运行不确定性,以及灵活发电、持续几小时的电池储能和灵活电解。然而,长时间储能即使能支持系统的可靠性,也可能会对市场表现和所有参与者的收益构成挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility
This work investigates the technical and financial performance of deeply decarbonised wholesale electricity markets with uncertain variable renewable generation (VRG), uncertain demand and different types of flexibility. It first finds that different combinations of power reserves (i.e. power generation capacity) and energy reserves (i.e. energy storage capacity), can achieve adequate system reliability at similar total costs. However, use of only energy reserves never achieved adequate system reliability, and this looks to be a fundamental challenge to the reliability of systems with only energy reserves but no power reserves. Two independent aspects of wholesale market operations are then found to be the main determinants of system reliability: the length of the unit commitment (UC) schedule prior to dispatch and the degree of operational uncertainty of VRG during dispatch.
It is then argued that reliable, least cost and efficient wholesale markets with dominant renewables need acceptably low levels of operational uncertainty of VRG, sufficient flexibility in generation and/or demand, and UC schedules that are significantly longer than the longest energy storage durations present. Rather than suggesting that innovation in market design is required, these results therefore suggest that different technical approaches should have important, future roles. These include mitigating the operational uncertainty of VRG via several potential means as well as flexible generation, battery storage of a few hours duration and flexible electrolysis. Long duration energy storage, however, may challenge market performance and all participants’ returns even if it supports system reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1