用于确定 1.5 T 磁共振成像仪在线自适应工作流程端到端几何精度的三维凝胶剂量计评估

Stijn Oolbekkink, Jochem W.H. Wolthaus, Bram van Asselen, Bas W. Raaymakers
{"title":"用于确定 1.5 T 磁共振成像仪在线自适应工作流程端到端几何精度的三维凝胶剂量计评估","authors":"Stijn Oolbekkink,&nbsp;Jochem W.H. Wolthaus,&nbsp;Bram van Asselen,&nbsp;Bas W. Raaymakers","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose:</h3><div>During an end-to-end (E2E) test on the online workflow of the MR-linac, the performance of the treatment starting from the acquisition of pre-treatment MRI scans and ending with dose delivery is quantified. In such a test, the geometrical accuracy of the entire workflow is assessed. Ideally, the 3D geometrical accuracy of dose delivery on an MR-linac should be assessed using dosimeters that provide 3D dose distributions. Gel dosimeters, for instance, have proven to be valuable tools for evaluating 3D dose distributions on an MR-linac. In this study, we investigated the use of 3D gel dosimeters for the assessment of the 3D geometrical accuracy and reproducibility of the adaptive procedure on an MR-linac in an E2E verification.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods:</h3><div>All measurements were performed on a clinical Unity MR-linac using 3D gel dosimeters in an anthropomorphic head phantom. Film measurements were performed as a reference dosimeter. An online adapt-to-shape procedure was performed for each measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The geometric accuracy and reproducibility of the gel dosimeter measurements were high, and similar to all in-plane film measurements. The largest shift found was 0.3 mm for the gel dosimeter, and 0.6 mm for the in-plane film measurements. The 3D displacement vectors of the gel dosimeter showed similar uncertainties as the in-plane film 2D displacement vectors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Gel dosimeters can be used for the assessment of the 3D end-to-end geometric accuracy of an MR-linac.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D gel dosimeter assessment for end-to-end geometric accuracy determination of the online adaptive workflow on the 1.5 T MR-linac\",\"authors\":\"Stijn Oolbekkink,&nbsp;Jochem W.H. Wolthaus,&nbsp;Bram van Asselen,&nbsp;Bas W. Raaymakers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose:</h3><div>During an end-to-end (E2E) test on the online workflow of the MR-linac, the performance of the treatment starting from the acquisition of pre-treatment MRI scans and ending with dose delivery is quantified. In such a test, the geometrical accuracy of the entire workflow is assessed. Ideally, the 3D geometrical accuracy of dose delivery on an MR-linac should be assessed using dosimeters that provide 3D dose distributions. Gel dosimeters, for instance, have proven to be valuable tools for evaluating 3D dose distributions on an MR-linac. In this study, we investigated the use of 3D gel dosimeters for the assessment of the 3D geometrical accuracy and reproducibility of the adaptive procedure on an MR-linac in an E2E verification.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods:</h3><div>All measurements were performed on a clinical Unity MR-linac using 3D gel dosimeters in an anthropomorphic head phantom. Film measurements were performed as a reference dosimeter. An online adapt-to-shape procedure was performed for each measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The geometric accuracy and reproducibility of the gel dosimeter measurements were high, and similar to all in-plane film measurements. The largest shift found was 0.3 mm for the gel dosimeter, and 0.6 mm for the in-plane film measurements. The 3D displacement vectors of the gel dosimeter showed similar uncertainties as the in-plane film 2D displacement vectors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Gel dosimeters can be used for the assessment of the 3D end-to-end geometric accuracy of an MR-linac.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在对核磁共振成像仪的在线工作流程进行端到端(E2E)测试时,要量化从获取治疗前核磁共振成像扫描开始到剂量投放结束的治疗性能。在这种测试中,要对整个工作流程的几何精度进行评估。理想情况下,应使用可提供三维剂量分布的剂量计来评估磁共振成像仪上剂量投放的三维几何精度。例如,凝胶剂量计已被证明是评估磁共振成像仪三维剂量分布的重要工具。在这项研究中,我们研究了在 E2E 验证中使用三维凝胶剂量计评估磁共振成像仪上自适应程序的三维几何精度和可重复性。胶片测量是作为参考剂量计进行的。结果:凝胶剂量计测量的几何精度和再现性都很高,与所有平面内胶片测量结果相似。凝胶剂量计的最大位移为 0.3 毫米,平面薄膜测量的最大位移为 0.6 毫米。凝胶剂量计的三维位移矢量显示出与平面薄膜二维位移矢量相似的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D gel dosimeter assessment for end-to-end geometric accuracy determination of the online adaptive workflow on the 1.5 T MR-linac

Background and purpose:

During an end-to-end (E2E) test on the online workflow of the MR-linac, the performance of the treatment starting from the acquisition of pre-treatment MRI scans and ending with dose delivery is quantified. In such a test, the geometrical accuracy of the entire workflow is assessed. Ideally, the 3D geometrical accuracy of dose delivery on an MR-linac should be assessed using dosimeters that provide 3D dose distributions. Gel dosimeters, for instance, have proven to be valuable tools for evaluating 3D dose distributions on an MR-linac. In this study, we investigated the use of 3D gel dosimeters for the assessment of the 3D geometrical accuracy and reproducibility of the adaptive procedure on an MR-linac in an E2E verification.

Materials and methods:

All measurements were performed on a clinical Unity MR-linac using 3D gel dosimeters in an anthropomorphic head phantom. Film measurements were performed as a reference dosimeter. An online adapt-to-shape procedure was performed for each measurement.

Results:

The geometric accuracy and reproducibility of the gel dosimeter measurements were high, and similar to all in-plane film measurements. The largest shift found was 0.3 mm for the gel dosimeter, and 0.6 mm for the in-plane film measurements. The 3D displacement vectors of the gel dosimeter showed similar uncertainties as the in-plane film 2D displacement vectors.

Conclusions:

Gel dosimeters can be used for the assessment of the 3D end-to-end geometric accuracy of an MR-linac.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation for a high-performance cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in the pelvic region Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer Normal tissue complication probability model for severe radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness Investigating the potential of diffusion tensor atlases to generate anisotropic clinical tumor volumes in glioblastoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1