接受直接负载控制的个体差异

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115009
Stepan Vesely , Christian A. Klöckner
{"title":"接受直接负载控制的个体差异","authors":"Stepan Vesely ,&nbsp;Christian A. Klöckner","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumer acceptance of direct load control is becoming increasingly important as energy systems transition towards greater reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. The objective of this paper is to better understand the attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance. To do so, we collect survey data from participants in 31 European countries (<em>N</em> = 5,970). Regression analyses testing a comprehensive model of attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance reveal that attitudes and beliefs specific to direct load control acceptance (social and personal norms, anticipated emotions, and outcome efficacy beliefs) predict acceptance, whereas more general attitudinal variables and socio-economic characteristics play no or only a secondary role. These findings substantially improve our understanding of direct load control acceptance. While European policy documents recognize the importance of individual attitudes for the success of demand response programs, reference to specific factors or processes is often missing due to lack of evidence. The present research helps fill this gap, and can inform the design of novel soft policy measures – highlighting the usefulness of facilitating positive peer influence, of reinforcing perceptions that engaging in demand response is effective, is the responsible thing to do, and also something to be proud of.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 115009"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in acceptance of direct load control\",\"authors\":\"Stepan Vesely ,&nbsp;Christian A. Klöckner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Consumer acceptance of direct load control is becoming increasingly important as energy systems transition towards greater reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. The objective of this paper is to better understand the attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance. To do so, we collect survey data from participants in 31 European countries (<em>N</em> = 5,970). Regression analyses testing a comprehensive model of attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance reveal that attitudes and beliefs specific to direct load control acceptance (social and personal norms, anticipated emotions, and outcome efficacy beliefs) predict acceptance, whereas more general attitudinal variables and socio-economic characteristics play no or only a secondary role. These findings substantially improve our understanding of direct load control acceptance. While European policy documents recognize the importance of individual attitudes for the success of demand response programs, reference to specific factors or processes is often missing due to lack of evidence. The present research helps fill this gap, and can inform the design of novel soft policy measures – highlighting the usefulness of facilitating positive peer influence, of reinforcing perceptions that engaging in demand response is effective, is the responsible thing to do, and also something to be proud of.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"325 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824011253\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824011253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着能源系统向更加依赖间歇性可再生能源过渡,消费者对直接负荷控制的接受程度变得越来越重要。本文旨在更好地了解消费者接受直接负荷控制的态度和社会经济决定因素。为此,我们收集了 31 个欧洲国家参与者的调查数据(N = 5970)。回归分析测试了直接负载控制接受度的态度和社会经济决定因素的综合模型,结果显示,与直接负载控制接受度相关的态度和信念(社会和个人规范、预期情绪和结果效能信念)可以预测接受度,而更一般的态度变量和社会经济特征则不起作用或仅起次要作用。这些发现大大提高了我们对直接负荷控制接受度的理解。虽然欧洲的政策文件承认个人态度对需求响应计划成功的重要性,但由于缺乏证据,往往没有提及具体的因素或过程。本研究有助于填补这一空白,并为设计新颖的软性政策措施提供信息--强调促进积极的同伴影响、强化参与需求响应是有效的、是负责任的行为、也是值得骄傲的行为等观念的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual differences in acceptance of direct load control
Consumer acceptance of direct load control is becoming increasingly important as energy systems transition towards greater reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. The objective of this paper is to better understand the attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance. To do so, we collect survey data from participants in 31 European countries (N = 5,970). Regression analyses testing a comprehensive model of attitudinal and socio-economic determinants of direct load control acceptance reveal that attitudes and beliefs specific to direct load control acceptance (social and personal norms, anticipated emotions, and outcome efficacy beliefs) predict acceptance, whereas more general attitudinal variables and socio-economic characteristics play no or only a secondary role. These findings substantially improve our understanding of direct load control acceptance. While European policy documents recognize the importance of individual attitudes for the success of demand response programs, reference to specific factors or processes is often missing due to lack of evidence. The present research helps fill this gap, and can inform the design of novel soft policy measures – highlighting the usefulness of facilitating positive peer influence, of reinforcing perceptions that engaging in demand response is effective, is the responsible thing to do, and also something to be proud of.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
期刊最新文献
Automatic building energy model development and debugging using large language models agentic workflow Early-stage identification of indoor leakage sources in factories Physics-consistent input convex neural network-driven reinforcement learning control for multi-zone radiant ceiling heating and cooling systems: An experimental study Optimizing energy efficiency in buildings’ cold water systems: A differential pressure control-based global approach Cement-MgO synergetic stabilized earth-straw mix: From material performance to building simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1