A. Alshahrani , S. Al-Aqeel , M. Alshahrani , S. Alqahtani , S.T. Alhawwashi , M.S. Al-Nasser , M. Zaitoun
{"title":"巴利昔尼治疗斑秃的预算影响分析:沙特医院的视角","authors":"A. Alshahrani , S. Al-Aqeel , M. Alshahrani , S. Alqahtani , S.T. Alhawwashi , M.S. Al-Nasser , M. Zaitoun","doi":"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of the adoption of baricitinib for the management of alopecia areata (AA) by a Saudi public sector payer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A BIA model was developed to calculate the expected financial impact under two scenarios: the baseline scenario, which reflects the current mix of treatments without baricitinib, and the projected scenario, in which baricitinib is adopted. The model assumed that patients with severe AA and those with mild-to-moderate AA who did not respond to other treatments were eligible for baricitinib treatment. The model input was based on published evidence, expert opinions, and the Saudi Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of AA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Assuming a hypothetical total eligible population of 368 patients received different AA treatments over the 12-months study period. The aggregated 5-years cost in the baseline scenario was SR 5,836,616. Upon the introduction of baricitinib as an alternative treatment for severe AA, the projected aggregated budget impact was SR 7,473,138. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were most sensitive to AA prevalence, percentage of severe AA, and predicted market share for baricitinib over the 5-year time horizon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of baricitinib to formularies is likely to increase the cost impact from a government hospital perspective. However, this addition expands the treatment options for patients with AA and may result in improved outcomes. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended to estimate the cost per incremental improvement in the outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"32 12","pages":"Article 102204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Alshahrani , S. Al-Aqeel , M. Alshahrani , S. Alqahtani , S.T. Alhawwashi , M.S. Al-Nasser , M. Zaitoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of the adoption of baricitinib for the management of alopecia areata (AA) by a Saudi public sector payer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A BIA model was developed to calculate the expected financial impact under two scenarios: the baseline scenario, which reflects the current mix of treatments without baricitinib, and the projected scenario, in which baricitinib is adopted. The model assumed that patients with severe AA and those with mild-to-moderate AA who did not respond to other treatments were eligible for baricitinib treatment. The model input was based on published evidence, expert opinions, and the Saudi Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of AA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Assuming a hypothetical total eligible population of 368 patients received different AA treatments over the 12-months study period. The aggregated 5-years cost in the baseline scenario was SR 5,836,616. Upon the introduction of baricitinib as an alternative treatment for severe AA, the projected aggregated budget impact was SR 7,473,138. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were most sensitive to AA prevalence, percentage of severe AA, and predicted market share for baricitinib over the 5-year time horizon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of baricitinib to formularies is likely to increase the cost impact from a government hospital perspective. However, this addition expands the treatment options for patients with AA and may result in improved outcomes. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended to estimate the cost per incremental improvement in the outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 102204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131901642400255X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131901642400255X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法建立了一个预算影响分析模型,以计算两种情况下的预期财务影响:基线情况(反映了目前没有巴利替尼的治疗组合)和预测情况(采用巴利替尼)。该模型假设重度 AA 患者和对其他治疗无效的轻度至中度 AA 患者有资格接受巴利替尼治疗。模型输入基于已发表的证据、专家意见和《沙特 AA 诊断和管理专家共识声明》。结果假设符合条件的总人数为 368 人,在 12 个月的研究期内接受了不同的 AA 治疗。基线方案的 5 年总费用为 5,836,616 沙特里亚尔。在引入巴利替尼作为重症 AA 的替代治疗方法后,预计的预算影响总额为 7,473,138 沙特里亚尔。敏感性分析表明,结果对 AA 患病率、严重 AA 的百分比以及巴利替尼在 5 年时间跨度内的预测市场份额最为敏感。不过,这增加了 AA 患者的治疗选择,可能会改善治疗效果。建议今后进行成本效益分析,以估算疗效每增加一项改善所需的成本。
Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective
Objectives
To perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of the adoption of baricitinib for the management of alopecia areata (AA) by a Saudi public sector payer.
Methods
A BIA model was developed to calculate the expected financial impact under two scenarios: the baseline scenario, which reflects the current mix of treatments without baricitinib, and the projected scenario, in which baricitinib is adopted. The model assumed that patients with severe AA and those with mild-to-moderate AA who did not respond to other treatments were eligible for baricitinib treatment. The model input was based on published evidence, expert opinions, and the Saudi Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of AA.
Results
Assuming a hypothetical total eligible population of 368 patients received different AA treatments over the 12-months study period. The aggregated 5-years cost in the baseline scenario was SR 5,836,616. Upon the introduction of baricitinib as an alternative treatment for severe AA, the projected aggregated budget impact was SR 7,473,138. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were most sensitive to AA prevalence, percentage of severe AA, and predicted market share for baricitinib over the 5-year time horizon.
Conclusion
The addition of baricitinib to formularies is likely to increase the cost impact from a government hospital perspective. However, this addition expands the treatment options for patients with AA and may result in improved outcomes. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended to estimate the cost per incremental improvement in the outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.