Gineesh Gopi , Woogeun Kim , Youngseok Lee , Chungwon Cho , Jung Kyung Kim
{"title":"寒冷室外条件下电动汽车车厢内伯克利热感觉和舒适度模型的实验评估","authors":"Gineesh Gopi , Woogeun Kim , Youngseok Lee , Chungwon Cho , Jung Kyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the automobile industry is transitioning toward electric vehicles, manufacturers have started implementing local warmers alongside cabin heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems for effective thermal comfort management. However, optimal operating strategies need to be developed for integrating local warmers with HVAC systems. Although the Berkeley models comprising local/overall thermal sensation and comfort models offer insights in this regard, they lack follow-up assessments for occupants transitioning from very cold states. In this study, Berkeley models were evaluated using two sets of experimental data collected in a transient vehicle cabin under cold outdoor conditions: test (A) with cabin HVAC alone and test (B) with both HVAC and local warmers. The findings confirm the satisfactory performances of the Berkeley models for predicting overall sensation and comfort, with a maximum root mean-squared error (RMSE) of 0.15. The local comfort model performed poorly with the original coefficients across both datasets (maximum RMSE of 1.96). Therefore, the model coefficients were regressed for the dataset from test A and validated against the dataset from test B to achieve a maximum RMSE of 0.49. With these regressed coefficients, it was observed that moving toward a neutral whole-body state diminished the potential to maximize local comfort. Conversely, the local sensation model showed poor agreement (maximum RMSE of 1.9); we confirmed that accurate adaptive setpoint temperatures are a prerequisite for ensuring good predictions from the model. These findings are expected to contribute toward future efforts in using Berkeley models to formulate effective local warmer–HVAC operational strategies in electric vehicles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 112231"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluations of Berkeley thermal sensation and comfort models in electric vehicle cabin under cold outdoor conditions\",\"authors\":\"Gineesh Gopi , Woogeun Kim , Youngseok Lee , Chungwon Cho , Jung Kyung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the automobile industry is transitioning toward electric vehicles, manufacturers have started implementing local warmers alongside cabin heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems for effective thermal comfort management. However, optimal operating strategies need to be developed for integrating local warmers with HVAC systems. Although the Berkeley models comprising local/overall thermal sensation and comfort models offer insights in this regard, they lack follow-up assessments for occupants transitioning from very cold states. In this study, Berkeley models were evaluated using two sets of experimental data collected in a transient vehicle cabin under cold outdoor conditions: test (A) with cabin HVAC alone and test (B) with both HVAC and local warmers. The findings confirm the satisfactory performances of the Berkeley models for predicting overall sensation and comfort, with a maximum root mean-squared error (RMSE) of 0.15. The local comfort model performed poorly with the original coefficients across both datasets (maximum RMSE of 1.96). Therefore, the model coefficients were regressed for the dataset from test A and validated against the dataset from test B to achieve a maximum RMSE of 0.49. With these regressed coefficients, it was observed that moving toward a neutral whole-body state diminished the potential to maximize local comfort. Conversely, the local sensation model showed poor agreement (maximum RMSE of 1.9); we confirmed that accurate adaptive setpoint temperatures are a prerequisite for ensuring good predictions from the model. These findings are expected to contribute toward future efforts in using Berkeley models to formulate effective local warmer–HVAC operational strategies in electric vehicles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324010734\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324010734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着汽车行业向电动汽车过渡,制造商开始在车厢加热、通风和空调(HVAC)系统旁安装局部加热器,以实现有效的热舒适管理。然而,需要制定最佳的操作策略,将局部加热器与 HVAC 系统集成在一起。虽然由局部/整体热感觉和舒适度模型组成的伯克利模型在这方面提供了见解,但它们缺乏对从极冷状态过渡到极冷状态的乘员的后续评估。在这项研究中,伯克利模型使用了在寒冷室外条件下的瞬态车厢内收集的两组实验数据进行评估:测试(A)仅使用车厢内的暖通空调系统,测试(B)同时使用暖通空调系统和局部加热器。结果证实,伯克利模型在预测整体感觉和舒适度方面表现令人满意,最大均方根误差(RMSE)为 0.15。局部舒适度模型在两个数据集中的原始系数表现不佳(最大均方根误差为 1.96)。因此,对测试 A 的数据集进行了模型系数回归,并根据测试 B 的数据集进行了验证,结果最大 RMSE 为 0.49。通过这些回归系数可以发现,向中性全身状态发展会降低局部舒适度最大化的潜力。相反,局部感觉模型的一致性较差(最大均方根误差为 1.9);我们证实,准确的自适应设定点温度是确保模型良好预测的先决条件。预计这些发现将有助于未来使用伯克利模型为电动汽车制定有效的本地暖风空调运行策略。
Experimental evaluations of Berkeley thermal sensation and comfort models in electric vehicle cabin under cold outdoor conditions
As the automobile industry is transitioning toward electric vehicles, manufacturers have started implementing local warmers alongside cabin heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems for effective thermal comfort management. However, optimal operating strategies need to be developed for integrating local warmers with HVAC systems. Although the Berkeley models comprising local/overall thermal sensation and comfort models offer insights in this regard, they lack follow-up assessments for occupants transitioning from very cold states. In this study, Berkeley models were evaluated using two sets of experimental data collected in a transient vehicle cabin under cold outdoor conditions: test (A) with cabin HVAC alone and test (B) with both HVAC and local warmers. The findings confirm the satisfactory performances of the Berkeley models for predicting overall sensation and comfort, with a maximum root mean-squared error (RMSE) of 0.15. The local comfort model performed poorly with the original coefficients across both datasets (maximum RMSE of 1.96). Therefore, the model coefficients were regressed for the dataset from test A and validated against the dataset from test B to achieve a maximum RMSE of 0.49. With these regressed coefficients, it was observed that moving toward a neutral whole-body state diminished the potential to maximize local comfort. Conversely, the local sensation model showed poor agreement (maximum RMSE of 1.9); we confirmed that accurate adaptive setpoint temperatures are a prerequisite for ensuring good predictions from the model. These findings are expected to contribute toward future efforts in using Berkeley models to formulate effective local warmer–HVAC operational strategies in electric vehicles.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.