基于激励的回收系统中不确定因素下可回收库存路线问题的联合优化

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110692
Meimei Zheng , Yuan Li , Ningxin Du , Qingyi Wang , Edward Huang , Peng Jiang
{"title":"基于激励的回收系统中不确定因素下可回收库存路线问题的联合优化","authors":"Meimei Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Ningxin Du ,&nbsp;Qingyi Wang ,&nbsp;Edward Huang ,&nbsp;Peng Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the value of resource recovery and the development of a circular economy, waste recycling has gathered global attention. Recently, many emerging cities designed new systems like an incentive-based recycling system (IBRS). In such systems, recyclables are collected through community recycling nodes by offering incentives, then transported to street recycling stations and sorted before being finally recycled. The increased recycling nodes and the incentives enhance the convenience and residents’ enthusiasm for waste recycling, but also intensify the uncertainty of recycling quantities and the complexity of the recycling operation management. Poor recycling operation management may result in increased recycling costs or greater loss of recyclables, which discourages residents from participating in recycling. Based on an existing IBRS, this study investigates the joint optimization problem of the recyclable inventory management at each community recycling node and the vehicle routing from the recycling nodes to the recycling station. A two-stage dual-objective multi-period stochastic programming model is established to minimize the loss of recyclables and logistics costs, which is further reformulated using the weighting method and transportation cost approximation parameters. To solve the reformulated model, a three-phase iterative algorithm is designed by combining the progressive hedging algorithm and route splitting algorithm based on the Lin-Kernighan heuristic. A case study is conducted using data from Shanghai’s IBRS. The proposed joint decision model is superior to separate decisions and the three-phase iterative algorithm can reduce the average total cost by up to 42.12% compared to the genetic algorithm and the Iteration-Move-Search method in the literature. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to provide managerial insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 110692"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint optimization of recyclable inventory routing problem under uncertainties in an incentive-based recycling system\",\"authors\":\"Meimei Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Ningxin Du ,&nbsp;Qingyi Wang ,&nbsp;Edward Huang ,&nbsp;Peng Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Due to the value of resource recovery and the development of a circular economy, waste recycling has gathered global attention. Recently, many emerging cities designed new systems like an incentive-based recycling system (IBRS). In such systems, recyclables are collected through community recycling nodes by offering incentives, then transported to street recycling stations and sorted before being finally recycled. The increased recycling nodes and the incentives enhance the convenience and residents’ enthusiasm for waste recycling, but also intensify the uncertainty of recycling quantities and the complexity of the recycling operation management. Poor recycling operation management may result in increased recycling costs or greater loss of recyclables, which discourages residents from participating in recycling. Based on an existing IBRS, this study investigates the joint optimization problem of the recyclable inventory management at each community recycling node and the vehicle routing from the recycling nodes to the recycling station. A two-stage dual-objective multi-period stochastic programming model is established to minimize the loss of recyclables and logistics costs, which is further reformulated using the weighting method and transportation cost approximation parameters. To solve the reformulated model, a three-phase iterative algorithm is designed by combining the progressive hedging algorithm and route splitting algorithm based on the Lin-Kernighan heuristic. A case study is conducted using data from Shanghai’s IBRS. The proposed joint decision model is superior to separate decisions and the three-phase iterative algorithm can reduce the average total cost by up to 42.12% compared to the genetic algorithm and the Iteration-Move-Search method in the literature. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to provide managerial insights.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008143\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于资源回收的价值和循环经济的发展,废物回收利用已受到全球关注。最近,许多新兴城市设计了新的系统,如激励型回收系统(IBRS)。在这种系统中,通过提供激励措施,可回收物通过社区回收节点被收集起来,然后被运送到街道回收站进行分类,最后被回收利用。回收节点的增加和奖励措施提高了垃圾回收的便利性和居民的积极性,但也加剧了回收数量的不确定性和回收运行管理的复杂性。如果回收运营管理不善,可能会导致回收成本增加或可回收物损耗加大,从而挫伤居民参与回收的积极性。本研究以现有的 IBRS 为基础,研究了各社区回收节点的可回收物库存管理和从回收节点到回收站的车辆路线的联合优化问题。建立了一个两阶段双目标多周期随机编程模型,以最小化可回收物损失和物流成本,并利用加权法和运输成本近似参数对该模型进行了进一步重构。为求解重构模型,设计了一种三阶段迭代算法,将渐进对冲算法和基于 Lin-Kernighan 启发式的路线分割算法结合起来。利用上海 IBRS 的数据进行了案例研究。与文献中的遗传算法和迭代-移动-搜索法相比,所提出的联合决策模型优于单独决策,三阶段迭代算法可将平均总成本降低 42.12%。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以提供管理见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Joint optimization of recyclable inventory routing problem under uncertainties in an incentive-based recycling system
Due to the value of resource recovery and the development of a circular economy, waste recycling has gathered global attention. Recently, many emerging cities designed new systems like an incentive-based recycling system (IBRS). In such systems, recyclables are collected through community recycling nodes by offering incentives, then transported to street recycling stations and sorted before being finally recycled. The increased recycling nodes and the incentives enhance the convenience and residents’ enthusiasm for waste recycling, but also intensify the uncertainty of recycling quantities and the complexity of the recycling operation management. Poor recycling operation management may result in increased recycling costs or greater loss of recyclables, which discourages residents from participating in recycling. Based on an existing IBRS, this study investigates the joint optimization problem of the recyclable inventory management at each community recycling node and the vehicle routing from the recycling nodes to the recycling station. A two-stage dual-objective multi-period stochastic programming model is established to minimize the loss of recyclables and logistics costs, which is further reformulated using the weighting method and transportation cost approximation parameters. To solve the reformulated model, a three-phase iterative algorithm is designed by combining the progressive hedging algorithm and route splitting algorithm based on the Lin-Kernighan heuristic. A case study is conducted using data from Shanghai’s IBRS. The proposed joint decision model is superior to separate decisions and the three-phase iterative algorithm can reduce the average total cost by up to 42.12% compared to the genetic algorithm and the Iteration-Move-Search method in the literature. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to provide managerial insights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Robotic disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: Technologies and opportunities A location-sizing and routing model for a biomethane production chain fed by municipal waste A reinforcement learning-driven cooperative scatter search for the knapsack problem with forfeits Ergonomic design of Human-Robot collaborative workstation in the Era of Industry 5.0 Towards sustainable cognitive digital twins: A portfolio management tool for waste mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1