水坝拆除后河道恢复的更长弧线

IF 3.1 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geomorphology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109442
Jordan F. Fields , Carl E. Renshaw , Evan N. Dethier , Francis J. Magilligan
{"title":"水坝拆除后河道恢复的更长弧线","authors":"Jordan F. Fields ,&nbsp;Carl E. Renshaw ,&nbsp;Evan N. Dethier ,&nbsp;Francis J. Magilligan","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dam removals are opportunistic experiments to address fundamental questions about river recovery to disturbance. Previous studies have shown that gravel-bedded rivers are resilient with covariate adjustments to channel dimensions occurring rapidly in the wake of disturbance. Yet, beyond the cross section, at the reach or watershed-scale, adjustment appears to take much longer. Understanding of the longer arc of reach and watershed recovery is limited by the relatively few dam removals studies that include long-term monitoring. Here, we present results from a five-year dam removal study punctuated by an extreme flood and show that the initial, rapid response of a channel is driven by the prevailing hydrology whereas longer-term adjustments to morphology at the reach scale are driven by external forces imposed on the channel. We summarize these results by classifying various channel features as either ‘intrinsic channel properties’ that are rapidly adjustable by the prevailing hydrology or ‘extrinsic channel properties’ that respond over various time scales to external boundary conditions imposed on the channel by climate, vegetation, geology, and valley dimensions (extrinsic controls). We show that this framework applies to channel recovery beyond the former reservoir and thus may prove applicable to channel disturbances beyond dam removal, such as extreme floods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"468 ","pages":"Article 109442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The longer arc of channel recovery post-dam removal\",\"authors\":\"Jordan F. Fields ,&nbsp;Carl E. Renshaw ,&nbsp;Evan N. Dethier ,&nbsp;Francis J. Magilligan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Dam removals are opportunistic experiments to address fundamental questions about river recovery to disturbance. Previous studies have shown that gravel-bedded rivers are resilient with covariate adjustments to channel dimensions occurring rapidly in the wake of disturbance. Yet, beyond the cross section, at the reach or watershed-scale, adjustment appears to take much longer. Understanding of the longer arc of reach and watershed recovery is limited by the relatively few dam removals studies that include long-term monitoring. Here, we present results from a five-year dam removal study punctuated by an extreme flood and show that the initial, rapid response of a channel is driven by the prevailing hydrology whereas longer-term adjustments to morphology at the reach scale are driven by external forces imposed on the channel. We summarize these results by classifying various channel features as either ‘intrinsic channel properties’ that are rapidly adjustable by the prevailing hydrology or ‘extrinsic channel properties’ that respond over various time scales to external boundary conditions imposed on the channel by climate, vegetation, geology, and valley dimensions (extrinsic controls). We show that this framework applies to channel recovery beyond the former reservoir and thus may prove applicable to channel disturbances beyond dam removal, such as extreme floods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomorphology\",\"volume\":\"468 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomorphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X24003945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X24003945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水坝拆除是解决河流受干扰后恢复的基本问题的机会性实验。以往的研究表明,砾石河床的河流具有很强的恢复能力,在受到干扰后,河道尺寸会迅速发生协变量调整。然而,在横断面之外,在河段或流域尺度上,调整似乎需要更长的时间。由于包括长期监测在内的水坝拆除研究相对较少,因此对河段和流域恢复的较长弧度的理解受到了限制。在此,我们介绍了一项为期五年、以特大洪水为节点的水坝拆除研究的结果,结果表明,河道最初的快速反应是由当时的水文驱动的,而河段尺度上形态的长期调整则是由施加在河道上的外力驱动的。我们将各种河道特征归类为 "内在河道特征 "和 "外在河道特征","内在河道特征 "可由当时的水文条件快速调节,而 "外在河道特征 "则在不同的时间尺度上对气候、植被、地质和河谷尺寸等强加给河道的外部边界条件(外在控制)做出反应。我们的研究表明,这一框架适用于原水库以外的河道恢复,因此可能被证明适用于大坝拆除以外的河道干扰,如特大洪水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The longer arc of channel recovery post-dam removal
Dam removals are opportunistic experiments to address fundamental questions about river recovery to disturbance. Previous studies have shown that gravel-bedded rivers are resilient with covariate adjustments to channel dimensions occurring rapidly in the wake of disturbance. Yet, beyond the cross section, at the reach or watershed-scale, adjustment appears to take much longer. Understanding of the longer arc of reach and watershed recovery is limited by the relatively few dam removals studies that include long-term monitoring. Here, we present results from a five-year dam removal study punctuated by an extreme flood and show that the initial, rapid response of a channel is driven by the prevailing hydrology whereas longer-term adjustments to morphology at the reach scale are driven by external forces imposed on the channel. We summarize these results by classifying various channel features as either ‘intrinsic channel properties’ that are rapidly adjustable by the prevailing hydrology or ‘extrinsic channel properties’ that respond over various time scales to external boundary conditions imposed on the channel by climate, vegetation, geology, and valley dimensions (extrinsic controls). We show that this framework applies to channel recovery beyond the former reservoir and thus may prove applicable to channel disturbances beyond dam removal, such as extreme floods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomorphology
Geomorphology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Eastward drainage-divide migrations driven by the spatial variations in precipitation and tectonic uplift contribute to the formation of the Parallel Rivers in the Hengduan Mountains, Southeastern Tibet Predicting urban channel morphology amidst multiple complexities Applying geoarchaeological principles to marine archaeology: A new reappraisal of the “first marine” and “in-situ” lithic scatters, Murujuga (Dampier Archipelago), NW Australia Topographic ridges express late Quaternary faulting peripheral to the New Madrid seismic zone, intraplate USA: Their tectonic implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1