浅层预制模块式地热交换器的效率和适用性数值研究

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121857
Hobyung Chae , Yujin Nam
{"title":"浅层预制模块式地热交换器的效率和适用性数值研究","authors":"Hobyung Chae ,&nbsp;Yujin Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study developed and validated a CFD model to evaluate the performance of modular ground heat exchangers (GHEs) compared to vertical closed-loop GHEs. The reliability of the model was confirmed through comparison with field experiment data, with RMSE values of 0.35 °C and 0.27 °C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the performance of modular GHEs installed at shallow depths was evaluated under various external environmental conditions, revealing a temperature difference of approximately 7 °C between the intermediate and cooling periods. A comparison of the performance of modular and vertical GHEs of the same heat exchanger length showed that, when a constant heat load of 2 kW was maintained for 100 h, the temperature in the vertical GHE increased to 32.8 °C, while the modular GHE reached 38.5 °C. Despite the high thermal conductivity resulting from ground heat storage effects, the modular GHE exhibited a greater temperature increase due to its shallow installation depth compared to the vertical GHE. On the other hand, as the thermal conductivity of the ground decreased, the temperature difference between the two systems also decreased. These results suggest that modular GHEs can be a cost-effective and efficient solution, particularly in regions with low ground thermal conductivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 121857"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical study on efficiency and applicability of prefabricated modular ground heat exchangers in shallow depth\",\"authors\":\"Hobyung Chae ,&nbsp;Yujin Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study developed and validated a CFD model to evaluate the performance of modular ground heat exchangers (GHEs) compared to vertical closed-loop GHEs. The reliability of the model was confirmed through comparison with field experiment data, with RMSE values of 0.35 °C and 0.27 °C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the performance of modular GHEs installed at shallow depths was evaluated under various external environmental conditions, revealing a temperature difference of approximately 7 °C between the intermediate and cooling periods. A comparison of the performance of modular and vertical GHEs of the same heat exchanger length showed that, when a constant heat load of 2 kW was maintained for 100 h, the temperature in the vertical GHE increased to 32.8 °C, while the modular GHE reached 38.5 °C. Despite the high thermal conductivity resulting from ground heat storage effects, the modular GHE exhibited a greater temperature increase due to its shallow installation depth compared to the vertical GHE. On the other hand, as the thermal conductivity of the ground decreased, the temperature difference between the two systems also decreased. These results suggest that modular GHEs can be a cost-effective and efficient solution, particularly in regions with low ground thermal conductivity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019256\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开发并验证了一个 CFD 模型,用于评估模块式地热交换器(GHEs)与垂直闭环地热交换器(GHEs)相比的性能。通过与现场实验数据对比,确认了模型的可靠性,入口和出口温度的 RMSE 值分别为 0.35 ℃ 和 0.27 ℃。此外,还在各种外部环境条件下评估了安装在浅层的模块式 GHE 的性能,结果表明中间期和冷却期的温差约为 7 ℃。对具有相同换热器长度的模块式和立式 GHE 的性能进行比较后发现,当 2 kW 的恒定热负荷维持 100 小时时,立式 GHE 的温度升至 32.8 °C,而模块式 GHE 则达到 38.5 °C。尽管地热储存效应产生了较高的热传导率,但与垂直式地热供暖器相比,模块式地热供暖器由于安装深度较浅,温度上升幅度更大。另一方面,随着地面导热系数的降低,两个系统之间的温差也在缩小。这些结果表明,模块式 GHE 是一种经济高效的解决方案,特别是在地面导热系数较低的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical study on efficiency and applicability of prefabricated modular ground heat exchangers in shallow depth
This study developed and validated a CFD model to evaluate the performance of modular ground heat exchangers (GHEs) compared to vertical closed-loop GHEs. The reliability of the model was confirmed through comparison with field experiment data, with RMSE values of 0.35 °C and 0.27 °C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the performance of modular GHEs installed at shallow depths was evaluated under various external environmental conditions, revealing a temperature difference of approximately 7 °C between the intermediate and cooling periods. A comparison of the performance of modular and vertical GHEs of the same heat exchanger length showed that, when a constant heat load of 2 kW was maintained for 100 h, the temperature in the vertical GHE increased to 32.8 °C, while the modular GHE reached 38.5 °C. Despite the high thermal conductivity resulting from ground heat storage effects, the modular GHE exhibited a greater temperature increase due to its shallow installation depth compared to the vertical GHE. On the other hand, as the thermal conductivity of the ground decreased, the temperature difference between the two systems also decreased. These results suggest that modular GHEs can be a cost-effective and efficient solution, particularly in regions with low ground thermal conductivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Broadband efficient light-absorbing SS-PPy@CNT membranes prepared by electrochemical deposition for photothermal conversion Multi-objective optimization of geothermal heating systems based on thermal economy and environmental impact evaluation Dynamic response and power performance of a combined semi-submersible floating wind turbine and point absorber wave energy converter array Rural energy poverty alleviation in OECD nations: An integrated analysis of renewable energy, green taxation, and the United Nations agenda 2030 Spectral correction of photovoltaic module electrical properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1