多轴疲劳寿命预测中有效模型参数估计的误差容限

IF 5.7 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Fatigue Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108700
Dariusz Skibicki , Aleksander Karolczuk
{"title":"多轴疲劳寿命预测中有效模型参数估计的误差容限","authors":"Dariusz Skibicki ,&nbsp;Aleksander Karolczuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiaxial fatigue life prediction models rely on intrinsic parameters that provide the balance between arbitrary and reference stress/strain conditions. However, this balance may be compromised due to evolving damage mechanisms, causing initially determined model parameters to deviate from actual values, resulting in life prediction errors. Despite the significant impact of fatigue model parameters on prediction accuracy, this issue is often ignored, with many studies assuming constant parameters to simplify prediction algorithms and reduce computational costs. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to quantify the error introduced into fatigue life predictions by approximate methods for determining model parameters under multiaxial loading paths. For the first time, error estimation was conducted using a life-dependent method, revealing that the error is a function of the selected approximation method and the ratio of slope coefficients from S-N curves for torsional versus uniaxial loading. These findings provide a unique framework for selecting computationally efficient approximation methods while balancing life prediction accuracy. This balance is crucial in the design of metallic components using fatigue topology optimization and finite element analysis. The proposed methodology, validated across eight metallic materials subjected to various multiaxial loading paths, offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between computational cost and prediction accuracy, which are essential for optimized structural design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 108700"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error tolerance for effective model parameter estimation in multiaxial fatigue life prediction\",\"authors\":\"Dariusz Skibicki ,&nbsp;Aleksander Karolczuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Multiaxial fatigue life prediction models rely on intrinsic parameters that provide the balance between arbitrary and reference stress/strain conditions. However, this balance may be compromised due to evolving damage mechanisms, causing initially determined model parameters to deviate from actual values, resulting in life prediction errors. Despite the significant impact of fatigue model parameters on prediction accuracy, this issue is often ignored, with many studies assuming constant parameters to simplify prediction algorithms and reduce computational costs. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to quantify the error introduced into fatigue life predictions by approximate methods for determining model parameters under multiaxial loading paths. For the first time, error estimation was conducted using a life-dependent method, revealing that the error is a function of the selected approximation method and the ratio of slope coefficients from S-N curves for torsional versus uniaxial loading. These findings provide a unique framework for selecting computationally efficient approximation methods while balancing life prediction accuracy. This balance is crucial in the design of metallic components using fatigue topology optimization and finite element analysis. The proposed methodology, validated across eight metallic materials subjected to various multiaxial loading paths, offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between computational cost and prediction accuracy, which are essential for optimized structural design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112324005590\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112324005590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多轴疲劳寿命预测模型依赖于提供任意应力/应变条件与参考应力/应变条件之间平衡的固有参数。然而,这种平衡可能会由于损伤机制的演变而受到影响,导致最初确定的模型参数偏离实际值,从而造成寿命预测误差。尽管疲劳模型参数对预测精度有重大影响,但这一问题往往被忽视,许多研究假定参数恒定,以简化预测算法并降低计算成本。在本研究中,我们引入了一种新方法,通过近似方法确定多轴加载路径下的模型参数,量化疲劳寿命预测中引入的误差。我们首次使用与寿命相关的方法进行误差估算,发现误差是所选近似方法和扭转加载与单轴加载的 S-N 曲线斜率系数比的函数。这些发现为在平衡寿命预测精度的同时选择计算效率高的近似方法提供了一个独特的框架。这种平衡对于使用疲劳拓扑优化和有限元分析设计金属部件至关重要。所提出的方法在八种承受不同多轴加载路径的金属材料中进行了验证,为计算成本和预测精度之间的权衡提供了宝贵的见解,而计算成本和预测精度对于优化结构设计至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Error tolerance for effective model parameter estimation in multiaxial fatigue life prediction
Multiaxial fatigue life prediction models rely on intrinsic parameters that provide the balance between arbitrary and reference stress/strain conditions. However, this balance may be compromised due to evolving damage mechanisms, causing initially determined model parameters to deviate from actual values, resulting in life prediction errors. Despite the significant impact of fatigue model parameters on prediction accuracy, this issue is often ignored, with many studies assuming constant parameters to simplify prediction algorithms and reduce computational costs. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to quantify the error introduced into fatigue life predictions by approximate methods for determining model parameters under multiaxial loading paths. For the first time, error estimation was conducted using a life-dependent method, revealing that the error is a function of the selected approximation method and the ratio of slope coefficients from S-N curves for torsional versus uniaxial loading. These findings provide a unique framework for selecting computationally efficient approximation methods while balancing life prediction accuracy. This balance is crucial in the design of metallic components using fatigue topology optimization and finite element analysis. The proposed methodology, validated across eight metallic materials subjected to various multiaxial loading paths, offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between computational cost and prediction accuracy, which are essential for optimized structural design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fatigue
International Journal of Fatigue 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
619
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address: Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements) Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions) Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation) Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.
期刊最新文献
Corrosion fatigue behavior of cast iron in simulated combustion product solutions of ammonia and methanol fuels A new nonlinear fatigue cumulative damage model based on load interaction and strength degradation Damage mechanisms of Ti60 under different uniaxial/multiaxial thermo-mechanical loading modes Effect of three-stage heat treatment on the composite waveform and variable amplitude fatigue properties of TC4 titanium alloy pulsed laser-arc hybrid welded joints A strain-interfaced digital twin solution for corner fatigue crack growth using Bayesian inference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1