Chelsea Dutkiewicz , Shania Liu , Asad Patanwala , Andrew J McLachlan , Jennifer Stevens , Kok Eng Khor , Bernadette Bugeja , David Begley , Ian Fong , Katelyn Jauregui , Jonathan Penm
{"title":"临床医生对急性疼痛阿片类镇痛药管理临床护理标准的看法","authors":"Chelsea Dutkiewicz , Shania Liu , Asad Patanwala , Andrew J McLachlan , Jennifer Stevens , Kok Eng Khor , Bernadette Bugeja , David Begley , Ian Fong , Katelyn Jauregui , Jonathan Penm","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Opioid analgesics are high-risk medicines, widely used in hospitals to manage pain. To improve the use of opioids in Australia, The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care released the first national Opioid Analgesic Stewardship in Acute Pain Clinical Care Standard (Opioid Stewardship Standard). The objective of this study was to explore clinicians’ perspectives of the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard to understand factors that may impact this process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative one-on-one interviews were conducted with clinicians, including doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and patient safety officers. The interview guide was developed based on the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach to identify common themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 32 clinicians were interviewed, including 10 doctors, 10 pharmacists, and 12 nurses from 26 sites across Australia. Themes identified included: (i) Organizational priorities, (ii) organizational capacity for implementation, (iii) changing prescribing practices, and (iv) the Opioid Stewardship Standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clinicians’ perceptions were categorized into four themes regarding the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Key findings from this study included the importance of local data to increase organizational prioritization, availability of resources and staffing to increase organizational capacity for implementation to implement the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Future studies should evaluate the impact of such strategies on implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Lay summary</h3><div>Health professionals need more support from the health system to deliver health care that aligns with policies such as the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Organisations within the health system should consider providing support such as staffing to meet these needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 5","pages":"Article 100936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians’ perspective of the opioid analgesic stewardship in acute pain clinical care standard\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Dutkiewicz , Shania Liu , Asad Patanwala , Andrew J McLachlan , Jennifer Stevens , Kok Eng Khor , Bernadette Bugeja , David Begley , Ian Fong , Katelyn Jauregui , Jonathan Penm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Opioid analgesics are high-risk medicines, widely used in hospitals to manage pain. To improve the use of opioids in Australia, The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care released the first national Opioid Analgesic Stewardship in Acute Pain Clinical Care Standard (Opioid Stewardship Standard). The objective of this study was to explore clinicians’ perspectives of the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard to understand factors that may impact this process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative one-on-one interviews were conducted with clinicians, including doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and patient safety officers. The interview guide was developed based on the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach to identify common themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 32 clinicians were interviewed, including 10 doctors, 10 pharmacists, and 12 nurses from 26 sites across Australia. Themes identified included: (i) Organizational priorities, (ii) organizational capacity for implementation, (iii) changing prescribing practices, and (iv) the Opioid Stewardship Standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clinicians’ perceptions were categorized into four themes regarding the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Key findings from this study included the importance of local data to increase organizational prioritization, availability of resources and staffing to increase organizational capacity for implementation to implement the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Future studies should evaluate the impact of such strategies on implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Lay summary</h3><div>Health professionals need more support from the health system to deliver health care that aligns with policies such as the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Organisations within the health system should consider providing support such as staffing to meet these needs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicians’ perspective of the opioid analgesic stewardship in acute pain clinical care standard
Objectives
Opioid analgesics are high-risk medicines, widely used in hospitals to manage pain. To improve the use of opioids in Australia, The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care released the first national Opioid Analgesic Stewardship in Acute Pain Clinical Care Standard (Opioid Stewardship Standard). The objective of this study was to explore clinicians’ perspectives of the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard to understand factors that may impact this process.
Methods
Qualitative one-on-one interviews were conducted with clinicians, including doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and patient safety officers. The interview guide was developed based on the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Interview transcriptions were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach to identify common themes.
Results
In total, 32 clinicians were interviewed, including 10 doctors, 10 pharmacists, and 12 nurses from 26 sites across Australia. Themes identified included: (i) Organizational priorities, (ii) organizational capacity for implementation, (iii) changing prescribing practices, and (iv) the Opioid Stewardship Standard.
Conclusions
Clinicians’ perceptions were categorized into four themes regarding the implementation of the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Key findings from this study included the importance of local data to increase organizational prioritization, availability of resources and staffing to increase organizational capacity for implementation to implement the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Future studies should evaluate the impact of such strategies on implementation.
Lay summary
Health professionals need more support from the health system to deliver health care that aligns with policies such as the Opioid Stewardship Standard. Organisations within the health system should consider providing support such as staffing to meet these needs.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics