{"title":"丰富性问题:对图书馆异步教学进行定性评估的文本挖掘方法","authors":"Grace Therrell, Joshua Ortiz Baco","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The expansive adoption of asynchronous library instruction in recent years remains strong even after the conclusion of most COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. This continued growth has also introduced unique methodological challenges for assessment of learning and instruction in the form of vast, unwieldy evaluation data. This study introduces the use of text mining, topic modeling, and exploratory data analysis (EDA) as a novel approach to address the evolving needs of the field of large-scale online library instruction assessment. Librarians employed computational methods on a corpus of 21,506 words from student survey responses representing the instruction experiences of 3720 students to evaluate initial effectiveness of a new instruction approach. The application of a Bayesian topic model revealed latent patterns in self-reported perceptions of course design, mastery of concepts, and gaps in learning. In contrast with the inherent limitations of traditional qualitative analysis, our computational-grounded approach highlights otherwise indiscernible trends and key issues in user experience, instructional content, and online teaching methods. Computational analysis offers the scalability and sustainability necessary to assess asynchronous instruction, and provides clear themes to inform decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 6","pages":"Article 102976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The problem of abundance: Text mining approaches to qualitative assessment of asynchronous library instruction\",\"authors\":\"Grace Therrell, Joshua Ortiz Baco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The expansive adoption of asynchronous library instruction in recent years remains strong even after the conclusion of most COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. This continued growth has also introduced unique methodological challenges for assessment of learning and instruction in the form of vast, unwieldy evaluation data. This study introduces the use of text mining, topic modeling, and exploratory data analysis (EDA) as a novel approach to address the evolving needs of the field of large-scale online library instruction assessment. Librarians employed computational methods on a corpus of 21,506 words from student survey responses representing the instruction experiences of 3720 students to evaluate initial effectiveness of a new instruction approach. The application of a Bayesian topic model revealed latent patterns in self-reported perceptions of course design, mastery of concepts, and gaps in learning. In contrast with the inherent limitations of traditional qualitative analysis, our computational-grounded approach highlights otherwise indiscernible trends and key issues in user experience, instructional content, and online teaching methods. Computational analysis offers the scalability and sustainability necessary to assess asynchronous instruction, and provides clear themes to inform decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332400137X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332400137X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The problem of abundance: Text mining approaches to qualitative assessment of asynchronous library instruction
The expansive adoption of asynchronous library instruction in recent years remains strong even after the conclusion of most COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. This continued growth has also introduced unique methodological challenges for assessment of learning and instruction in the form of vast, unwieldy evaluation data. This study introduces the use of text mining, topic modeling, and exploratory data analysis (EDA) as a novel approach to address the evolving needs of the field of large-scale online library instruction assessment. Librarians employed computational methods on a corpus of 21,506 words from student survey responses representing the instruction experiences of 3720 students to evaluate initial effectiveness of a new instruction approach. The application of a Bayesian topic model revealed latent patterns in self-reported perceptions of course design, mastery of concepts, and gaps in learning. In contrast with the inherent limitations of traditional qualitative analysis, our computational-grounded approach highlights otherwise indiscernible trends and key issues in user experience, instructional content, and online teaching methods. Computational analysis offers the scalability and sustainability necessary to assess asynchronous instruction, and provides clear themes to inform decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.