误捕港湾鼠海豚:确定风险的空间分布,为管理措施提供依据

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/aqc.70003
Hope E. Irvine, Eunice H. Pinn, I. Philip Smith, William Lart
{"title":"误捕港湾鼠海豚:确定风险的空间分布,为管理措施提供依据","authors":"Hope E. Irvine,&nbsp;Eunice H. Pinn,&nbsp;I. Philip Smith,&nbsp;William Lart","doi":"10.1002/aqc.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bycatch in static nets (i.e., gillnets, trammel nets and tangle nets) has been identified as the leading cause of harbour porpoise mortality globally. Various options are available for mitigating and managing this risk. However, selecting the most effective management measures to balance harbour porpoise conservation needs with sustainable fishing practice is challenging. By understanding the spatial variation of bycatch risk, it is possible to tailor mitigation and management options for a specific localised area or region. This study identified areas of potential interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing activity. An interaction index, a measure of the coincidence of porpoise and fishing activity, was developed. Using this approach, it was possible to differentiate between areas that potentially represented concentrations of higher bycatch risk and other areas with a lower but more widespread level of risk. For the Irish and Celtic Seas, an area recognised as having the highest harbour porpoise bycatch rate in European waters, there was a low to moderate interaction index, with the risk spread over a relatively large area. In the North Sea, in contrast, high values of the interaction index occurred in smaller areas, indicating that bycatch risk was more concentrated in this region. With the exception of some coastal areas, the interaction index was generally low for the West of Scotland and Ireland region. The identification of potential areas of interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing provides an opportunity to focus monitoring efforts and inform management decisions. For example, the use of area-based management encompassing small areas may be appropriate when spatially concentrated risk of bycatch is evidenced, whereas the use of technical measures, such as pingers, could be considered for areas with widespread lower risk of bycatch.</p>","PeriodicalId":55493,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","volume":"34 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aqc.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harbour Porpoise Bycatch: Determining Spatial Distribution of Risk to Inform Management Measures\",\"authors\":\"Hope E. Irvine,&nbsp;Eunice H. Pinn,&nbsp;I. Philip Smith,&nbsp;William Lart\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aqc.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bycatch in static nets (i.e., gillnets, trammel nets and tangle nets) has been identified as the leading cause of harbour porpoise mortality globally. Various options are available for mitigating and managing this risk. However, selecting the most effective management measures to balance harbour porpoise conservation needs with sustainable fishing practice is challenging. By understanding the spatial variation of bycatch risk, it is possible to tailor mitigation and management options for a specific localised area or region. This study identified areas of potential interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing activity. An interaction index, a measure of the coincidence of porpoise and fishing activity, was developed. Using this approach, it was possible to differentiate between areas that potentially represented concentrations of higher bycatch risk and other areas with a lower but more widespread level of risk. For the Irish and Celtic Seas, an area recognised as having the highest harbour porpoise bycatch rate in European waters, there was a low to moderate interaction index, with the risk spread over a relatively large area. In the North Sea, in contrast, high values of the interaction index occurred in smaller areas, indicating that bycatch risk was more concentrated in this region. With the exception of some coastal areas, the interaction index was generally low for the West of Scotland and Ireland region. The identification of potential areas of interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing provides an opportunity to focus monitoring efforts and inform management decisions. For example, the use of area-based management encompassing small areas may be appropriate when spatially concentrated risk of bycatch is evidenced, whereas the use of technical measures, such as pingers, could be considered for areas with widespread lower risk of bycatch.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aqc.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.70003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静态渔网(即刺网、三重刺网和缠结网)中的兼捕渔获物已被确定为全球造成港湾鼠海豚死亡的主要原因。有多种方案可用于降低和管理这一风险。然而,选择最有效的管理措施来平衡港湾江豚的保护需求和可持续捕捞实践是一项挑战。通过了解副渔获物风险的空间变化,可以为特定的局部地区或区域量身定制缓解和管理方案。本研究确定了港湾鼠海豚与静态网捕鱼活动之间的潜在互动区域。互动指数是衡量江豚与捕鱼活动重合程度的指标。利用这种方法,可以区分可能代表较高误捕风险集中的区域和其他风险较低但更广泛的区域。爱尔兰海和凯尔特海被认为是欧洲水域港湾鼠海豚误捕率最高的海域,该海域的相互作用指数为低到中等,风险分布在相对较大的区域。相反,在北海,较小区域的交互作用指数值较高,表明误捕风险更集中在该区域。除一些沿海地区外,苏格兰西部和爱尔兰地区的交互作用指数普遍较低。识别港湾鼠海豚和静态网捕鱼之间相互作用的潜在区域为集中监控工作和为 管理决策提供信息提供了机会。例如,当有证据表明混获风险在空间上集中时,使用包括小区域的基于区域的管理可能是合适的,而对于混获风险普遍较低的区域,可考虑使用技术措施(如 Pingers)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harbour Porpoise Bycatch: Determining Spatial Distribution of Risk to Inform Management Measures

Bycatch in static nets (i.e., gillnets, trammel nets and tangle nets) has been identified as the leading cause of harbour porpoise mortality globally. Various options are available for mitigating and managing this risk. However, selecting the most effective management measures to balance harbour porpoise conservation needs with sustainable fishing practice is challenging. By understanding the spatial variation of bycatch risk, it is possible to tailor mitigation and management options for a specific localised area or region. This study identified areas of potential interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing activity. An interaction index, a measure of the coincidence of porpoise and fishing activity, was developed. Using this approach, it was possible to differentiate between areas that potentially represented concentrations of higher bycatch risk and other areas with a lower but more widespread level of risk. For the Irish and Celtic Seas, an area recognised as having the highest harbour porpoise bycatch rate in European waters, there was a low to moderate interaction index, with the risk spread over a relatively large area. In the North Sea, in contrast, high values of the interaction index occurred in smaller areas, indicating that bycatch risk was more concentrated in this region. With the exception of some coastal areas, the interaction index was generally low for the West of Scotland and Ireland region. The identification of potential areas of interaction between harbour porpoise and static net fishing provides an opportunity to focus monitoring efforts and inform management decisions. For example, the use of area-based management encompassing small areas may be appropriate when spatially concentrated risk of bycatch is evidenced, whereas the use of technical measures, such as pingers, could be considered for areas with widespread lower risk of bycatch.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is an international journal dedicated to publishing original papers that relate specifically to freshwater, brackish or marine habitats and encouraging work that spans these ecosystems. This journal provides a forum in which all aspects of the conservation of aquatic biological resources can be presented and discussed, enabling greater cooperation and efficiency in solving problems in aquatic resource conservation.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Occupancy Models for Data Collected on Stream Networks Rhodolith Beds in a Shifting World: A Palaeontological Perspective Analysing Turbulence Patterns in Nature-Like Fishways: An Experimental Approach Selective Breeding Is an Underexplored Route Towards Conservation of the Endangered Noble Crayfish Behaviours of Sea Turtles in Shipwrecks in Northeast Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1