Thomas L. Neils, Stephanie Schaertel, Todd P. Silverstein
{"title":"水的 pKa 和描述溶液平衡的基本规律:呼吁采用一致的热力学教学法","authors":"Thomas L. Neils, Stephanie Schaertel, Todd P. Silverstein","doi":"10.1002/hlca.202400103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recurring misconception in some textbooks and research papers has led to an abandonment of fundamental physical laws when describing a subset of acid-base equilibria, especially regarding the role of the solvent. In the specific case of the autoprotolysis of water, experiments and theoretical calculations prove that the <i>K</i><sub>w</sub> of water at 25 °C, 1.00×10<sup>−14</sup>, is identical to its acid ionization constant, <i>K</i><sub>a</sub>. Nevertheless, several articles have been published erroneously purporting to give theoretical proof that the <i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of water is 10<sup>−15.743</sup> (1.81×10<sup>−16</sup>) and that the <i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of the aqueous proton (hydronium ion) is 55.3 rather than 1.00. Here we argue that using the incorrect numbers has pedagogical implications beyond those of a simple error. Arguments for the incorrect <i>K<sub>a</sub></i> and p<i>K<sub>a</sub></i> values require a misapplication of Henry's law and violate long-standing methods that use Raoult's law and the conservation of matter to describe the behavior of solutions. As a result, chemistry students may be asked to accept one set of physical principles in one course and another set in another course. Here we argue for adherence to fundamental physical laws governing solution equilibria as applied to the autoprotolysis of water and all aqueous acid base equilibria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12842,"journal":{"name":"Helvetica Chimica Acta","volume":"107 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hlca.202400103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pKa of Water and the Fundamental Laws Describing Solution Equilibria: An Appeal for a Consistent Thermodynamic Pedagogy\",\"authors\":\"Thomas L. Neils, Stephanie Schaertel, Todd P. Silverstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hlca.202400103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A recurring misconception in some textbooks and research papers has led to an abandonment of fundamental physical laws when describing a subset of acid-base equilibria, especially regarding the role of the solvent. In the specific case of the autoprotolysis of water, experiments and theoretical calculations prove that the <i>K</i><sub>w</sub> of water at 25 °C, 1.00×10<sup>−14</sup>, is identical to its acid ionization constant, <i>K</i><sub>a</sub>. Nevertheless, several articles have been published erroneously purporting to give theoretical proof that the <i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of water is 10<sup>−15.743</sup> (1.81×10<sup>−16</sup>) and that the <i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of the aqueous proton (hydronium ion) is 55.3 rather than 1.00. Here we argue that using the incorrect numbers has pedagogical implications beyond those of a simple error. Arguments for the incorrect <i>K<sub>a</sub></i> and p<i>K<sub>a</sub></i> values require a misapplication of Henry's law and violate long-standing methods that use Raoult's law and the conservation of matter to describe the behavior of solutions. As a result, chemistry students may be asked to accept one set of physical principles in one course and another set in another course. Here we argue for adherence to fundamental physical laws governing solution equilibria as applied to the autoprotolysis of water and all aqueous acid base equilibria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helvetica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"107 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hlca.202400103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helvetica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hlca.202400103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helvetica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hlca.202400103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一些教科书和研究论文中经常出现的误解导致人们在描述酸碱平衡时放弃了基本的物理定律,特别是关于溶剂的作用。就水的自分解而言,实验和理论计算证明,水在 25 °C 时的 Kw 值 1.00×10-14 与它的酸电离常数 Ka 相同。尽管如此,仍有一些文章错误地发表,声称从理论上证明水的 Ka 是 10-15.743 (1.81×10-16),水质子(氢离子)的 Ka 是 55.3 而不是 1.00。在此,我们认为使用错误的数字对教学的影响超出了简单的错误。论证错误的 Ka 和 pKa 值需要错误地应用亨利定律,并且违反了长期以来使用拉乌尔定律和物质守恒来描述溶液行为的方法。因此,化学学生可能会被要求在一门课程中接受一套物理原理,而在另一门课程中接受另一套物理原理。在此,我们主张遵守溶液平衡的基本物理定律,并将其应用于水的自分解和所有水性酸碱平衡。
The pKa of Water and the Fundamental Laws Describing Solution Equilibria: An Appeal for a Consistent Thermodynamic Pedagogy
A recurring misconception in some textbooks and research papers has led to an abandonment of fundamental physical laws when describing a subset of acid-base equilibria, especially regarding the role of the solvent. In the specific case of the autoprotolysis of water, experiments and theoretical calculations prove that the Kw of water at 25 °C, 1.00×10−14, is identical to its acid ionization constant, Ka. Nevertheless, several articles have been published erroneously purporting to give theoretical proof that the Ka of water is 10−15.743 (1.81×10−16) and that the Ka of the aqueous proton (hydronium ion) is 55.3 rather than 1.00. Here we argue that using the incorrect numbers has pedagogical implications beyond those of a simple error. Arguments for the incorrect Ka and pKa values require a misapplication of Henry's law and violate long-standing methods that use Raoult's law and the conservation of matter to describe the behavior of solutions. As a result, chemistry students may be asked to accept one set of physical principles in one course and another set in another course. Here we argue for adherence to fundamental physical laws governing solution equilibria as applied to the autoprotolysis of water and all aqueous acid base equilibria.
期刊介绍:
Helvetica Chimica Acta, founded by the Swiss Chemical Society in 1917, is a monthly multidisciplinary journal dedicated to the dissemination of knowledge in all disciplines of chemistry (organic, inorganic, physical, technical, theoretical and analytical chemistry) as well as research at the interface with other sciences, where molecular aspects are key to the findings. Helvetica Chimica Acta is committed to the publication of original, high quality papers at the frontier of scientific research. All contributions will be peer reviewed with the highest possible standards and published within 3 months of receipt, with no restriction on the length of the papers and in full color.