转移性结直肠癌患者的晚期治疗方案:综述和循证算法

IF 81.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0
Paolo Ciracì, Vittorio Studiale, Ada Taravella, Carlotta Antoniotti, Chiara Cremolini
{"title":"转移性结直肠癌患者的晚期治疗方案:综述和循证算法","authors":"Paolo Ciracì, Vittorio Studiale, Ada Taravella, Carlotta Antoniotti, Chiara Cremolini","doi":"10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine–tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRAS<sup>G12C</sup> inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.</p>","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":81.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Ciracì, Vittorio Studiale, Ada Taravella, Carlotta Antoniotti, Chiara Cremolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine–tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRAS<sup>G12C</sup> inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":81.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几年中,针对难治性转移性结直肠癌患者出现了几种新型全身治疗方法,因此选择最有效的后期治疗方法成为肿瘤内科医生面临的一项挑战。在过去十年中,瑞戈非尼和曲氟嘧啶-替吡拉西尔是唯一可用的药物,与最佳支持治疗相比,它们的临床疗效往往有限。随后改变临床实践的试验结果开辟了几条新的治疗途径,既适用于未经选择的患者(如曲氟啶-替哌嘧啶加贝伐单抗或fruquintinib),也适用于肿瘤中存在可操作改变的亚组(如HER2靶向疗法或KRASG12C抑制剂),或在循环肿瘤DNA中对之前接受的靶向药物没有获得性耐药机制的亚组(如抗EGFR抗体再治疗)。在本综述中,我们全面概述了过去几年中该领域的进展,并从实用角度出发,介绍了如何利用循证算法将最相关的结果转化为转移性结直肠癌患者的日常管理。最后,我们讨论了一些最有吸引力的研究领域,并重点介绍了一些有可能进一步扩大治疗范围的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm

Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine–tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRASG12C inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
期刊最新文献
Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor cell therapies for cancer: progress made and remaining roadblocks Navigating the changing landscape of BTK-targeted therapies for B cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Author Correction: The high costs of anticancer therapies in the USA: challenges, opportunities and progress NALIRIFOX in the frontline for metastatic pancreatic cancer: evidence beyond NAPOLI 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1