Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology最新文献

HER2-targeted therapies for patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer are rapidly evolving, offering a range of more complex and personalized treatment options. Currently, an array of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibody–drug conjugates are administered, sometimes alongside chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, both in curative and palliative contexts. However, the heterogeneous nature of HER2⁺ breast cancer demands a deeper understanding of disease biology and its role in responsiveness to novel HER2-targeted agents, as well as non-HER2-targeted therapies, in order to optimize patient outcomes. In this Review, we revisit the mechanisms of action of HER2-targeted agents, examine the evidence supporting the use of dual HER2 blockade in patients with HER2-amplified tumours, and explore the role of biomarkers in guiding future treatment strategies. We also discuss potential implications for the future treatment of patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer.

Despite documented evidence that ovarian cancer cells express immune-checkpoint molecules, such as PD-1 and PD-L1, and of a positive correlation between the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and favourable overall survival outcomes in patients with this tumour type, the results of trials testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients thus far have been disappointing. The lack of response to ICIs can be attributed to tumour heterogeneity as well as inherent or acquired resistance associated with the tumour microenvironment (TME). Understanding tumour immunobiology, discovering biomarkers for patient selection and establishing optimal treatment combinations remains the hope but also a key challenge for the future application of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. In this Review, we summarize results from trials testing ICIs in patients with ovarian cancer. We propose the implementation of a systematic CD8⁺ T cell-based immunophenotypic classification of this malignancy, followed by discussions of the preclinical data providing the basis to treat such immunophenotypes with combination immunotherapies. We posit that the integration of an accurate TME immunophenotype characterization with genetic data can enable the design of tailored therapeutic approaches and improve patient recruitment in clinical trials. Lastly, we propose a roadmap incorporating tissue-based profiling to guide future trials testing adoptive cell therapy approaches and assess novel immunotherapy combinations while promoting collaborative research.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer among women in high-income countries, with both incidence and mortality continuing to increase. The complexity of the management of patients with EC has evolved with greater comprehension of the underlying biology and heterogeneity of this disease. With a growing number of novel therapeutic agents available, emerging treatment regimens seem to have the potential to help to address the concerning trends in EC-related mortality. In this Review, we describe the epidemiology, histopathology and molecular classification of EC as well as the role of the new (2023) International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) staging model. Furthermore, we provide an overview of disease management in the first-line and recurrent disease settings. With increasing use of molecular profiling and updates in treatment paradigms, we also summarize new developments in this rapidly changing treatment landscape.

Tumour mutational burden (TMB), defined as the total number of somatic non-synonymous mutations present within the cancer genome, varies across and within cancer types. A first wave of retrospective and prospective research identified TMB as a predictive biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors and culminated in the disease-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with TMB-high tumours based on data from the Keynote-158 trial. Although the applicability of outcomes from this trial to all cancer types and the optimal thresholds for TMB are yet to be ascertained, research into TMB is advancing along three principal avenues: enhancement of TMB assessments through rigorous quality control measures within the laboratory process, including the mitigation of confounding factors such as limited panel scope and low tumour purity; refinement of the traditional TMB framework through the incorporation of innovative concepts such as clonal, persistent or HLA-corrected TMB, tumour neoantigen load and mutational signatures; and integration of TMB with established and emerging biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, immune gene expression profiles and the tumour immune contexture. Given its pivotal functions in both the pathogenesis of cancer and the ability of the immune system to recognize tumours, a profound comprehension of the foundational principles and the continued evolution of TMB are of paramount relevance for the field of oncology.

Anti-oestrogen-based therapies, often combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, are the current standard-of-care first-line therapy for patients with advanced-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) breast cancer. Resistance to anti-oestrogen agents inevitably occurs, mediated by oestrogen receptor (ER)-dependent or ER-independent mechanisms that drive tumour progression. Emerging endocrine therapies include, but are not limited to, next-generation oral ER degraders and proteolysis targeting chimeras, which might be particularly effective in patients with ESR1-mutant breast cancer. Furthermore, cancers harbouring driver alterations in oncogenic signalling pathways, including AKT and PI3K, might be susceptible to novel combination strategies involving targeted inhibitors. Next-generation CDK2/4 inhibitors are an area of active clinical investigation, and efforts are ongoing to evaluate the role of sequential CDK inhibition. Approved and emerging antibody–drug conjugates exploiting novel target antigens have also demonstrated promising clinical activity. These novel agents, as well as further identification and characterization of predictive biomarkers, will hopefully continue to improve clinical outcomes, reduce the incidence of toxicities, and limit the extent of overtreatment in this population. In this Review, we describe the evolving treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic HR⁺ breast cancer in light of the growing armamentarium of drugs and biomarkers that will help to shape the future therapeutic landscape. These strategies are expected to involve tumour molecular profiling to enable the delivery of precision medicine.