能源 ETF 的表现与气候风险

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031
Minh Nhat Nguyen, Ruipeng Liu, Youwei Li
{"title":"能源 ETF 的表现与气候风险","authors":"Minh Nhat Nguyen, Ruipeng Liu, Youwei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate whether green (brown) portfolios constructed from clean energy ETFs (fossil fuel ETFs) yield positive (negative) returns conditional on climate-related risks. While the green portfolios do not unconditionally outperform the brown ones, the outperformance of green portfolios is statistically significant under the conditional setting using non-parametric estimates with imposing inequality restrictions. Our conditional studies also show that brown portfolios are riskier than green ones with various measurements. We present the heterogeneity in the effect of climate information on the return and risk of green and brown portfolios. Furthermore, we document that fund flows for green assets are higher than those for brown ones during periods of high climate risks. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of energy ETFs and climate risks\",\"authors\":\"Minh Nhat Nguyen, Ruipeng Liu, Youwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate whether green (brown) portfolios constructed from clean energy ETFs (fossil fuel ETFs) yield positive (negative) returns conditional on climate-related risks. While the green portfolios do not unconditionally outperform the brown ones, the outperformance of green portfolios is statistically significant under the conditional setting using non-parametric estimates with imposing inequality restrictions. Our conditional studies also show that brown portfolios are riskier than green ones with various measurements. We present the heterogeneity in the effect of climate information on the return and risk of green and brown portfolios. Furthermore, we document that fund flows for green assets are higher than those for brown ones during periods of high climate risks. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了由清洁能源 ETF(化石燃料 ETF)构建的绿色(棕色)投资组合是否会在气候相关风险的条件下产生正(负)回报。虽然绿色投资组合的表现并不是无条件地优于棕色投资组合,但在有条件的情况下,利用施加了不平等限制的非参数估计,绿色投资组合的优于性在统计上是显著的。我们的条件研究还表明,在不同的测量条件下,棕色投资组合的风险高于绿色投资组合。我们介绍了气候信息对绿色和棕色投资组合收益和风险影响的异质性。此外,我们还发现,在气候风险高发期,绿色资产的资金流量高于棕色资产。我们的研究结果对其他规格都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of energy ETFs and climate risks
We investigate whether green (brown) portfolios constructed from clean energy ETFs (fossil fuel ETFs) yield positive (negative) returns conditional on climate-related risks. While the green portfolios do not unconditionally outperform the brown ones, the outperformance of green portfolios is statistically significant under the conditional setting using non-parametric estimates with imposing inequality restrictions. Our conditional studies also show that brown portfolios are riskier than green ones with various measurements. We present the heterogeneity in the effect of climate information on the return and risk of green and brown portfolios. Furthermore, we document that fund flows for green assets are higher than those for brown ones during periods of high climate risks. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1