Fengqi Wu, Shuwen Liu, Julien Lamour, Owen K Atkin, Nan Yang, Tingting Dong, Weiying Xu, Nicholas G Smith, Zhihui Wang, Han Wang, Yanjun Su, Xiaojuan Liu, Yue Shi, Aijun Xing, Guanhua Dai, Jinlong Dong, Nathan G Swenson, Jens Kattge, Peter B Reich, Shawn P Serbin, Alistair Rogers, Jin Wu, Zhengbing Yan
{"title":"将不同森林类型的叶片暗呼吸与叶片特征和反射光谱学联系起来。","authors":"Fengqi Wu, Shuwen Liu, Julien Lamour, Owen K Atkin, Nan Yang, Tingting Dong, Weiying Xu, Nicholas G Smith, Zhihui Wang, Han Wang, Yanjun Su, Xiaojuan Liu, Yue Shi, Aijun Xing, Guanhua Dai, Jinlong Dong, Nathan G Swenson, Jens Kattge, Peter B Reich, Shawn P Serbin, Alistair Rogers, Jin Wu, Zhengbing Yan","doi":"10.1111/nph.20267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leaf dark respiration (R<sub>dark</sub>), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (V<sub>cmax</sub>), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed. Here, we analyzed R<sub>dark</sub> variability and its associations with V<sub>cmax</sub> and other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative. We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> than commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships were always weak (r<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.15) and forest-specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships, accurately predicted cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing to R<sub>dark</sub> variability. Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross-site scalability regarding R<sub>dark</sub>, challenging the use of empirical trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimating R<sub>dark</sub>, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking leaf dark respiration to leaf traits and reflectance spectroscopy across diverse forest types.\",\"authors\":\"Fengqi Wu, Shuwen Liu, Julien Lamour, Owen K Atkin, Nan Yang, Tingting Dong, Weiying Xu, Nicholas G Smith, Zhihui Wang, Han Wang, Yanjun Su, Xiaojuan Liu, Yue Shi, Aijun Xing, Guanhua Dai, Jinlong Dong, Nathan G Swenson, Jens Kattge, Peter B Reich, Shawn P Serbin, Alistair Rogers, Jin Wu, Zhengbing Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.20267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leaf dark respiration (R<sub>dark</sub>), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (V<sub>cmax</sub>), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed. Here, we analyzed R<sub>dark</sub> variability and its associations with V<sub>cmax</sub> and other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative. We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> than commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships were always weak (r<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.15) and forest-specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships, accurately predicted cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing to R<sub>dark</sub> variability. Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross-site scalability regarding R<sub>dark</sub>, challenging the use of empirical trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimating R<sub>dark</sub>, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Linking leaf dark respiration to leaf traits and reflectance spectroscopy across diverse forest types.
Leaf dark respiration (Rdark), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed. Here, we analyzed Rdark variability and its associations with Vcmax and other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative. We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross-site Rdark than commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait-Rdark relationships were always weak (r2 ≤ 0.15) and forest-specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait-Rdark relationships, accurately predicted cross-site Rdark (r2 = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing to Rdark variability. Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross-site scalability regarding Rdark, challenging the use of empirical trait-Rdark relationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimating Rdark, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.