分娩方式可能会严重影响利用脐带血和羊水进行的全息研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0
Yun Huang, Lin Zhang, Qian Chen, Jun Zhang
{"title":"分娩方式可能会严重影响利用脐带血和羊水进行的全息研究。","authors":"Yun Huang, Lin Zhang, Qian Chen, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a general lack of awareness regarding how the mode of delivery can significantly influence the omics composition of biological samples such as umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. To address this, we analyzed the impact of delivery mode on proteomic and metabolomic profiles in a cohort of 40 healthy pregnant women without complications, including 16 who had vaginal delivery (VD), 16 who underwent elective cesarean delivery by maternal request (CS), and 8 who had intrapartum cesarean section (Intra_CS). Using label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for proteomic and untargeted metabolomic analyses, we compared amniotic fluid and cord blood samples across delivery modes. The amniotic fluid proteomic and metabolomic profiles of CS women exhibited clear separation from those of VD individuals, whereas only the proteomic profiles of the Intra_CS group differed when compared to the CS group. In cord blood, metabolomic profiles differed between CS and VD women, but proteomic profiles showed no separation. These findings highlight the significant impact of delivery mode on omics profiles, particularly amniotic fluid proteomics and metabolomics, and cord blood metabolomics. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and expand their generalizability to broader populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mode of delivery may seriously affect omics studies using umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Huang, Lin Zhang, Qian Chen, Jun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a general lack of awareness regarding how the mode of delivery can significantly influence the omics composition of biological samples such as umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. To address this, we analyzed the impact of delivery mode on proteomic and metabolomic profiles in a cohort of 40 healthy pregnant women without complications, including 16 who had vaginal delivery (VD), 16 who underwent elective cesarean delivery by maternal request (CS), and 8 who had intrapartum cesarean section (Intra_CS). Using label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for proteomic and untargeted metabolomic analyses, we compared amniotic fluid and cord blood samples across delivery modes. The amniotic fluid proteomic and metabolomic profiles of CS women exhibited clear separation from those of VD individuals, whereas only the proteomic profiles of the Intra_CS group differed when compared to the CS group. In cord blood, metabolomic profiles differed between CS and VD women, but proteomic profiles showed no separation. These findings highlight the significant impact of delivery mode on omics profiles, particularly amniotic fluid proteomics and metabolomics, and cord blood metabolomics. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and expand their generalizability to broader populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07828-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于分娩方式如何显著影响脐带血和羊水等生物样本的omics组成,人们普遍缺乏认识。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了分娩方式对蛋白质组和代谢组谱的影响。我们的研究对象是 40 名无并发症的健康孕妇,其中 16 名是阴道分娩(VD),16 名是在产妇要求下选择剖宫产(CS),8 名是产后剖宫产(Intra_CS)。我们使用无标记液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)进行蛋白质组和非靶向代谢组分析,比较了不同分娩方式下的羊水和脐带血样本。CS产妇的羊水蛋白质组和代谢组与VD产妇的羊水蛋白质组和代谢组明显不同,而只有Intra_CS组的蛋白质组与CS组不同。在脐带血中,CS 妇女和 VD 妇女的代谢组学特征不同,但蛋白质组学特征未显示出差异。这些发现凸显了分娩方式对omics图谱的重要影响,尤其是羊水蛋白质组学和代谢组学以及脐带血代谢组学。需要进行更大规模的研究来验证这些发现,并将其推广到更广泛的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mode of delivery may seriously affect omics studies using umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid.

There is a general lack of awareness regarding how the mode of delivery can significantly influence the omics composition of biological samples such as umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. To address this, we analyzed the impact of delivery mode on proteomic and metabolomic profiles in a cohort of 40 healthy pregnant women without complications, including 16 who had vaginal delivery (VD), 16 who underwent elective cesarean delivery by maternal request (CS), and 8 who had intrapartum cesarean section (Intra_CS). Using label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for proteomic and untargeted metabolomic analyses, we compared amniotic fluid and cord blood samples across delivery modes. The amniotic fluid proteomic and metabolomic profiles of CS women exhibited clear separation from those of VD individuals, whereas only the proteomic profiles of the Intra_CS group differed when compared to the CS group. In cord blood, metabolomic profiles differed between CS and VD women, but proteomic profiles showed no separation. These findings highlight the significant impact of delivery mode on omics profiles, particularly amniotic fluid proteomics and metabolomics, and cord blood metabolomics. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and expand their generalizability to broader populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory study on the enhancement of O-RADS application effectiveness for novice ultrasonographers via deep learning. Supportive care and information needs in relation to quality of life among patients with breast cancer and gynaecological cancer during the time of treatment. Evaluation of uterocervical angle in intrauterine device displacement cases. Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis. When pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy meet: a multidisciplinary clinical experts review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1