Amit Bardia, Edward R Melnick, Terika McCall, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, Clark Fisher, Matthew M Burg, Robert B Schonberger
{"title":"在三级医疗保健系统中导致不遵守手术抗生素预防指南的个人和系统因素：定性分析。","authors":"Amit Bardia, Edward R Melnick, Terika McCall, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, Clark Fisher, Matthew M Burg, Robert B Schonberger","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics play a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections, yet adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines varies widely. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing perioperative antibiotic administration and assess the potential impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, perioperative personnel with diverse roles (surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified nurse anesthetists, trainees, and pharmacists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format from September 2023 through April 2024. Interviews were then analyzed for codes which were assigned to concepts using the constant comparison method for assessment of factors that were described as barriers or facilitators of guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After piloting with three interviews, we conducted nine sessions with a total of 17 participants: 7 attending anesthesiologists, 3 resident trainees, 2 perioperative pharmacists, 3 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and 2 attending surgeons. Key themes emerged: (1) Limited familiarity with Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) antibiotic guidelines, (2) Lack of standardization and optimization of antibiotic decision-making process, (3) Challenges with managing beta-lactam allergies, (4) Difficulty optimizing vancomycin timing, and (5) Perceived benefit of a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in enhancing workflow and guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-adherence to antibiotic guidelines in the perioperative setting often results from a lack of structured workflow. Our interviews provide a foundation for developing a clinical decision support tool tailored to provider needs, aiming to improve user satisfaction and promote better adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual and System Level Factors Contributing to Guideline Non-Adherent Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Health Care System: A Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Bardia, Edward R Melnick, Terika McCall, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, Clark Fisher, Matthew M Burg, Robert B Schonberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics play a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections, yet adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines varies widely. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing perioperative antibiotic administration and assess the potential impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, perioperative personnel with diverse roles (surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified nurse anesthetists, trainees, and pharmacists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format from September 2023 through April 2024. Interviews were then analyzed for codes which were assigned to concepts using the constant comparison method for assessment of factors that were described as barriers or facilitators of guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After piloting with three interviews, we conducted nine sessions with a total of 17 participants: 7 attending anesthesiologists, 3 resident trainees, 2 perioperative pharmacists, 3 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and 2 attending surgeons. Key themes emerged: (1) Limited familiarity with Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) antibiotic guidelines, (2) Lack of standardization and optimization of antibiotic decision-making process, (3) Challenges with managing beta-lactam allergies, (4) Difficulty optimizing vancomycin timing, and (5) Perceived benefit of a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in enhancing workflow and guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-adherence to antibiotic guidelines in the perioperative setting often results from a lack of structured workflow. Our interviews provide a foundation for developing a clinical decision support tool tailored to provider needs, aiming to improve user satisfaction and promote better adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individual and System Level Factors Contributing to Guideline Non-Adherent Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Health Care System: A Qualitative Analysis.
Background: Antibiotics play a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections, yet adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines varies widely. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing perioperative antibiotic administration and assess the potential impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on guideline adherence.
Methods: In this qualitative study, perioperative personnel with diverse roles (surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified nurse anesthetists, trainees, and pharmacists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format from September 2023 through April 2024. Interviews were then analyzed for codes which were assigned to concepts using the constant comparison method for assessment of factors that were described as barriers or facilitators of guideline adherence.
Results: After piloting with three interviews, we conducted nine sessions with a total of 17 participants: 7 attending anesthesiologists, 3 resident trainees, 2 perioperative pharmacists, 3 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and 2 attending surgeons. Key themes emerged: (1) Limited familiarity with Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) antibiotic guidelines, (2) Lack of standardization and optimization of antibiotic decision-making process, (3) Challenges with managing beta-lactam allergies, (4) Difficulty optimizing vancomycin timing, and (5) Perceived benefit of a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in enhancing workflow and guideline adherence.
Conclusions: Non-adherence to antibiotic guidelines in the perioperative setting often results from a lack of structured workflow. Our interviews provide a foundation for developing a clinical decision support tool tailored to provider needs, aiming to improve user satisfaction and promote better adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines.
期刊介绍：
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
