[99m锝]锝-HDP 骨 SPECT/CT 定量:能否通过更稳健的归一化改进基于体重的标准化摄取值?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Research Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s13550-024-01167-6
Damian Tiberiu, Noel Spielhofer, Jakob Heimer, Alexander W Sauter, Cristina Popescu, Daniel Hausmann, Jason L Manser, Karim Eid, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Irene A Burger
{"title":"[99m锝]锝-HDP 骨 SPECT/CT 定量:能否通过更稳健的归一化改进基于体重的标准化摄取值?","authors":"Damian Tiberiu, Noel Spielhofer, Jakob Heimer, Alexander W Sauter, Cristina Popescu, Daniel Hausmann, Jason L Manser, Karim Eid, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Irene A Burger","doi":"10.1186/s13550-024-01167-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of quantitative SPECT/CT allows more objective assessments of tracer accumulation in SPECT. However standardized uptake values (SUV) still do not play a big role for orthopedic or oncologic questions. With a more reliable normalization, the use of quantitative measures might also be of use for a more objective assessment of lesions. We retrospectively included patients that received a quantitative [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]-HDP bone SPECT/CT scan of the lumbar spine for 4 body weight (BW) categories. Measurements of bone activity (kBq/cc) and bone density in Hounsfield Units (HU) in a standard volume of interest in the femur, the first and the fifth lumbar vertebra of all patients, without active disease within these regions was made. Correlations between tracer uptake and clinical parameters (BW, height, age, gender) were assessed with a multiple regression and based on the model coefficients, a correction formula was calculated and applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest correlation between measured activity in L1 and patient parameters was found for BW (r= -0.64, p < 0.001), compared to height (r = -0.28, p = 0.002) and age (r = -0.34, p = 0.001). Furthermore, there was a weak positive correlation between tracer accumulation and bone density (r: 0.35, p < 0.001). Using standard normalization with BW there was a very weak positive correlation between SUV<sub>BW</sub> at L1 and BW with a slight overestimation in heavier subjects (r = 0.15, p = 0.09). The calculated correction based on the multiple regression of activity as dependent variable, and weight, age and bone density as significant predictors resulted in more robust uptake values with non-significant associations to BW, height, age or density. However, there was still a wide interindividual range of values for normalized bone activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using an age, bone density and weight-based normalization significantly decreased the interindividual variability of normal uptake on quantitative SPECT/CT compared to the regularly used BW adjusted SUV<sub>BW</sub>. However, a generalized normalization is difficult in the presence of strong patient effects, not attributable to the measured clinical variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-HDP bone SPECT/CT: can we improve the body weight based standardized uptake value with a more robust normalization?\",\"authors\":\"Damian Tiberiu, Noel Spielhofer, Jakob Heimer, Alexander W Sauter, Cristina Popescu, Daniel Hausmann, Jason L Manser, Karim Eid, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Irene A Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13550-024-01167-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of quantitative SPECT/CT allows more objective assessments of tracer accumulation in SPECT. However standardized uptake values (SUV) still do not play a big role for orthopedic or oncologic questions. With a more reliable normalization, the use of quantitative measures might also be of use for a more objective assessment of lesions. We retrospectively included patients that received a quantitative [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]-HDP bone SPECT/CT scan of the lumbar spine for 4 body weight (BW) categories. Measurements of bone activity (kBq/cc) and bone density in Hounsfield Units (HU) in a standard volume of interest in the femur, the first and the fifth lumbar vertebra of all patients, without active disease within these regions was made. Correlations between tracer uptake and clinical parameters (BW, height, age, gender) were assessed with a multiple regression and based on the model coefficients, a correction formula was calculated and applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest correlation between measured activity in L1 and patient parameters was found for BW (r= -0.64, p < 0.001), compared to height (r = -0.28, p = 0.002) and age (r = -0.34, p = 0.001). Furthermore, there was a weak positive correlation between tracer accumulation and bone density (r: 0.35, p < 0.001). Using standard normalization with BW there was a very weak positive correlation between SUV<sub>BW</sub> at L1 and BW with a slight overestimation in heavier subjects (r = 0.15, p = 0.09). The calculated correction based on the multiple regression of activity as dependent variable, and weight, age and bone density as significant predictors resulted in more robust uptake values with non-significant associations to BW, height, age or density. However, there was still a wide interindividual range of values for normalized bone activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using an age, bone density and weight-based normalization significantly decreased the interindividual variability of normal uptake on quantitative SPECT/CT compared to the regularly used BW adjusted SUV<sub>BW</sub>. However, a generalized normalization is difficult in the presence of strong patient effects, not attributable to the measured clinical variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01167-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01167-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定量 SPECT/CT 的引入使 SPECT 对示踪剂累积的评估更加客观。然而,标准化摄取值(SUV)在骨科或肿瘤科问题上仍然没有发挥很大作用。如果能进行更可靠的归一化处理,定量测量也可能有助于对病变进行更客观的评估。我们回顾性地纳入了接受过腰椎定量[99mTc]-HDP 骨 SPECT/CT 扫描的 4 个体重(BW)类别的患者。在所有患者的股骨、第一和第五腰椎的标准感兴趣体积内测量骨活性(kBq/cc)和骨密度(HU),这些区域内没有活动性疾病。通过多元回归评估示踪剂摄取量与临床参数(体重、身高、年龄、性别)之间的相关性,并根据模型系数计算和应用校正公式:结果:在 L1 测量的活动量与患者参数之间,体重的相关性最强(r= -0.64,p BW at L1 和体重,体重较大的受试者略有高估(r=0.15,p=0.09)。根据以活动量为因变量,体重、年龄和骨密度为重要预测因素的多元回归计算校正,得出的摄入量值更加稳健,与体重、身高、年龄或骨密度的关系不显著。然而,归一化骨活动的个体间数值范围仍然很大:结论:与常规使用的体重调整 SUVBW 相比,使用基于年龄、骨密度和体重的归一化方法可显著降低定量 SPECT/CT 正常摄取量的个体间变异性。但是,如果存在与测量的临床变量无关的强烈的患者效应,则很难采用通用的归一化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantification of [99mTc]Tc-HDP bone SPECT/CT: can we improve the body weight based standardized uptake value with a more robust normalization?

Background: The introduction of quantitative SPECT/CT allows more objective assessments of tracer accumulation in SPECT. However standardized uptake values (SUV) still do not play a big role for orthopedic or oncologic questions. With a more reliable normalization, the use of quantitative measures might also be of use for a more objective assessment of lesions. We retrospectively included patients that received a quantitative [99mTc]-HDP bone SPECT/CT scan of the lumbar spine for 4 body weight (BW) categories. Measurements of bone activity (kBq/cc) and bone density in Hounsfield Units (HU) in a standard volume of interest in the femur, the first and the fifth lumbar vertebra of all patients, without active disease within these regions was made. Correlations between tracer uptake and clinical parameters (BW, height, age, gender) were assessed with a multiple regression and based on the model coefficients, a correction formula was calculated and applied.

Results: The strongest correlation between measured activity in L1 and patient parameters was found for BW (r= -0.64, p < 0.001), compared to height (r = -0.28, p = 0.002) and age (r = -0.34, p = 0.001). Furthermore, there was a weak positive correlation between tracer accumulation and bone density (r: 0.35, p < 0.001). Using standard normalization with BW there was a very weak positive correlation between SUVBW at L1 and BW with a slight overestimation in heavier subjects (r = 0.15, p = 0.09). The calculated correction based on the multiple regression of activity as dependent variable, and weight, age and bone density as significant predictors resulted in more robust uptake values with non-significant associations to BW, height, age or density. However, there was still a wide interindividual range of values for normalized bone activity.

Conclusion: Using an age, bone density and weight-based normalization significantly decreased the interindividual variability of normal uptake on quantitative SPECT/CT compared to the regularly used BW adjusted SUVBW. However, a generalized normalization is difficult in the presence of strong patient effects, not attributable to the measured clinical variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
期刊最新文献
In vitro and ex vivo evaluation of preclinical models for FAP-targeted theranostics: differences and relevance for radiotracer evaluation. cfDNA fragmentation patterns correlate with tumor burden measured via PSMA PET/CT volumetric parameters in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. P2X 7-receptor binding in new-onset and secondary progressive MS - a [11C]SMW139 PET study. PET imaging of GABAA receptors in pancreatic islets by [11C]flumazenil. Imaging tumor and ascites-associated macrophages in a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1