Jack E Harrison, Fiona Lynch, Zornitza Stark, Danya F Vears
{"title":"分析公众对人工智能在基因组医学中应用的看法。","authors":"Jack E Harrison, Fiona Lynch, Zornitza Stark, Danya F Vears","doi":"10.1186/s40246-024-00686-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Next generation sequencing has led to the creation of large pools of genomic data with analysis rather than data generation now the limiting factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be required to optimize the benefits of these data, but little is known about how the public feels about the use of AI in genomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups with members of the Australian public. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. We explored potential uses of AI in genomic medicine, the benefits, risks, and the possible social implications of its use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 34) largely felt comfortable with AI analysing their own genomic data and generally agreed about its benefits. Concerns were raised over data security, the potential for misdiagnosis, and bias AI may perpetuate. Many participants wanted checking mechanisms for when results were generated using AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The insights gained from these discussions help to understand public concerns around the use of AI in genomic medicine. Our findings can help to inform both policies around genomic AI and how to educate the public on its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":"18 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Jack E Harrison, Fiona Lynch, Zornitza Stark, Danya F Vears\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40246-024-00686-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Next generation sequencing has led to the creation of large pools of genomic data with analysis rather than data generation now the limiting factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be required to optimize the benefits of these data, but little is known about how the public feels about the use of AI in genomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups with members of the Australian public. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. We explored potential uses of AI in genomic medicine, the benefits, risks, and the possible social implications of its use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 34) largely felt comfortable with AI analysing their own genomic data and generally agreed about its benefits. Concerns were raised over data security, the potential for misdiagnosis, and bias AI may perpetuate. Many participants wanted checking mechanisms for when results were generated using AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The insights gained from these discussions help to understand public concerns around the use of AI in genomic medicine. Our findings can help to inform both policies around genomic AI and how to educate the public on its use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Genomics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00686-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00686-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine.
Purpose: Next generation sequencing has led to the creation of large pools of genomic data with analysis rather than data generation now the limiting factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be required to optimize the benefits of these data, but little is known about how the public feels about the use of AI in genomics.
Methods: We conducted focus groups with members of the Australian public. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. We explored potential uses of AI in genomic medicine, the benefits, risks, and the possible social implications of its use.
Results: Participants (n = 34) largely felt comfortable with AI analysing their own genomic data and generally agreed about its benefits. Concerns were raised over data security, the potential for misdiagnosis, and bias AI may perpetuate. Many participants wanted checking mechanisms for when results were generated using AI.
Conclusions: The insights gained from these discussions help to understand public concerns around the use of AI in genomic medicine. Our findings can help to inform both policies around genomic AI and how to educate the public on its use.
期刊介绍:
Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics.
Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.