软组织肉瘤近距离放射治疗:保持局部控制,同时尽量减少并发症。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/jso.27999
Julien Montreuil, Eric Kholodovsky, Moses Markowitz, Sergio Torralbas Fitz, Dominic Campano, Erik Geiger, Francis Hornicek, Brooke Crawford, Martin Keisch, H Thomas Temple
{"title":"软组织肉瘤近距离放射治疗:保持局部控制,同时尽量减少并发症。","authors":"Julien Montreuil, Eric Kholodovsky, Moses Markowitz, Sergio Torralbas Fitz, Dominic Campano, Erik Geiger, Francis Hornicek, Brooke Crawford, Martin Keisch, H Thomas Temple","doi":"10.1002/jso.27999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the clinical and oncologic outcomes of high-dose brachytherapy (BRT) versus both preoperative and postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the setting of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 144 patients treated surgically for soft tissue sarcoma at the same institution from 2010 to 2021. Patients treated for a soft tissue sarcoma with surgery and radiation therapy in the form of BRT, Neoadjuvant EBRT (Neo-EBRT) or adjuvant EBRT (AD-EBRT) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 patients were treated with BRT, 42 with Neo-EBRT, and 46 with AD-EBRT. There was a greater incidence of grouped wound complications in Neo-EBRT with 50% compared to both BRT with 25% and AD-EBRT with 28.3% (p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was an increased risk of wound complications with Neo-EBRT when compared to brachytherapy (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was no difference in risk of LR between treatment groups (p = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brachytherapy is a valuable treatment modality that offers clinical and logistical advantages when compared to the conventional Neo-EBRT in soft tissue sarcomas. Brachytherapy offers a lower risk of wound complications and a comparable local control. This manuscript presents decision-making strategies for determining the appropriate radiation modality for specific circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brachytherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Maintaining Local Control While Minimizing Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Julien Montreuil, Eric Kholodovsky, Moses Markowitz, Sergio Torralbas Fitz, Dominic Campano, Erik Geiger, Francis Hornicek, Brooke Crawford, Martin Keisch, H Thomas Temple\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the clinical and oncologic outcomes of high-dose brachytherapy (BRT) versus both preoperative and postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the setting of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 144 patients treated surgically for soft tissue sarcoma at the same institution from 2010 to 2021. Patients treated for a soft tissue sarcoma with surgery and radiation therapy in the form of BRT, Neoadjuvant EBRT (Neo-EBRT) or adjuvant EBRT (AD-EBRT) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 patients were treated with BRT, 42 with Neo-EBRT, and 46 with AD-EBRT. There was a greater incidence of grouped wound complications in Neo-EBRT with 50% compared to both BRT with 25% and AD-EBRT with 28.3% (p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was an increased risk of wound complications with Neo-EBRT when compared to brachytherapy (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was no difference in risk of LR between treatment groups (p = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brachytherapy is a valuable treatment modality that offers clinical and logistical advantages when compared to the conventional Neo-EBRT in soft tissue sarcomas. Brachytherapy offers a lower risk of wound complications and a comparable local control. This manuscript presents decision-making strategies for determining the appropriate radiation modality for specific circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在评估高剂量近距离放射治疗(BRT)与术前和术后体外放射治疗(EBRT)在高级别软组织肉瘤中的临床和肿瘤学疗效:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2010年至2021年在同一机构接受手术治疗的144名软组织肉瘤患者。研究对象包括接受手术治疗的软组织肉瘤患者,以及接受快速放射治疗(BRT)、新辅助EBRT(Neo-EBRT)或辅助EBRT(AD-EBRT)放疗的患者:结果:56 名患者接受了 BRT 治疗,42 名患者接受了新辅助 EBRT 治疗,46 名患者接受了 AD-EBRT 治疗。与 BRT 的 25% 和 AD-EBRT 的 28.3% 相比,Neo-EBRT 的伤口并发症发生率更高(50%)(P = 0.02)。单变量和多变量分析显示,与近距离放射治疗相比,Neo-EBRT 发生伤口并发症的风险更高(分别为 p = 0.03 和 p = 0.007)。单变量和多变量分析表明,治疗组之间的LR风险没有差异(p = 0.28):近距离放射治疗是一种有价值的治疗方式,与传统的新EBRT相比,它在软组织肉瘤的临床和后勤方面具有优势。近距离放射治疗的伤口并发症风险较低,局部控制效果相当。本手稿介绍了针对具体情况确定合适放射模式的决策策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brachytherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Maintaining Local Control While Minimizing Complications.

Background: This study aims to assess the clinical and oncologic outcomes of high-dose brachytherapy (BRT) versus both preoperative and postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the setting of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 144 patients treated surgically for soft tissue sarcoma at the same institution from 2010 to 2021. Patients treated for a soft tissue sarcoma with surgery and radiation therapy in the form of BRT, Neoadjuvant EBRT (Neo-EBRT) or adjuvant EBRT (AD-EBRT) were included.

Results: 56 patients were treated with BRT, 42 with Neo-EBRT, and 46 with AD-EBRT. There was a greater incidence of grouped wound complications in Neo-EBRT with 50% compared to both BRT with 25% and AD-EBRT with 28.3% (p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was an increased risk of wound complications with Neo-EBRT when compared to brachytherapy (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that there was no difference in risk of LR between treatment groups (p = 0.28).

Conclusion: Brachytherapy is a valuable treatment modality that offers clinical and logistical advantages when compared to the conventional Neo-EBRT in soft tissue sarcomas. Brachytherapy offers a lower risk of wound complications and a comparable local control. This manuscript presents decision-making strategies for determining the appropriate radiation modality for specific circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
About the Cover. Collagen Density Is Associated With Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Predictors Based on the Radiologic Characteristics for Aggressiveness of Small (< 20 mm) Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Addressing Breast Cancer Disparities: A Comprehensive Approach to Health Equity. Letter to "Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1