FENO200 和 CANO 在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD) 和哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺病重叠 (ACO) 中的临床意义差异。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S486324
Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu
{"title":"FENO200 和 CANO 在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD) 和哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺病重叠 (ACO) 中的临床意义差异。","authors":"Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S486324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO<sub>200</sub>) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values of FENO<sub>200</sub> in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO<sub>200</sub> exhibited negative correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO<sub>200</sub> demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO<sub>200</sub>. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO<sub>50</sub> discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO<sub>200</sub> has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO<sub>200</sub> levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO, FENO<sub>50</sub> may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1151-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Clinical Significance of FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).\",\"authors\":\"Guansheng Zeng, Jian Xu, Huadong Zeng, Cuilan Wang, Lichang Chen, Huapeng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JAA.S486324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO<sub>200</sub>) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values of FENO<sub>200</sub> in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO<sub>200</sub> exhibited negative correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO<sub>200</sub> demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub>, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO<sub>200</sub>. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub> was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO<sub>50</sub> discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO<sub>200</sub> has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO<sub>200</sub> levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO<sub>200</sub> and CANO, FENO<sub>50</sub> may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1151-1161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S486324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S486324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD 重叠(ACO)患者中,以 200 mL/s 流速测量的呼出一氧化氮分数浓度(FENO200)和肺泡中一氧化氮浓度(CANO)的不同临床意义:共纳入 178 例患者,其中哮喘组 82 例,慢性阻塞性肺疾病组 47 例,ACO 组 49 例。收集人口统计学数据、肺活量和呼出一氧化氮数据,进行比较分析、相关分析和判别卡农分析:结果:哮喘组、慢性阻塞性肺病组和 ACO 组的 FENO200 值分别为 11.0(7.0-22.3)、8.0(6.0-11.0)和 9.0(6.5-19.5)ppb。在哮喘组,FENO200 与 FEV1/FVC、MMEF 和 MEF50 呈负相关。在 CANO 和肺功能参数之间没有观察到明显的相关性。在慢性阻塞性肺病组,FENO200 和 CANO 均与肺功能参数(包括 FVC、FEV1、PEF、MMEF、MEF75 和 MEF50)呈负相关。在 ACO 组,FENO200 与肺功能参数无明显相关性,而 CANO 与 FEV1、PEF、MMEF 和 MEF50 相关。在慢性阻塞性肺病组中,支气管扩张剂测试中的ΔFEV1 与 FENO200 相关。至于 ACO 组,ΔFEV1 与 CANO 相关。在判别标准分析中,性别、年龄、MEF75 和 FENO50 这四个参数区分了哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 这三个组别:结论:在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 患者中,FENO200 与 CANO 有很强的相关性。在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病中,FENO200 水平升高主要表明肺功能受损,而 CANO 水平升高主要与慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 的肺功能受损相关。与 FENO200 和 CANO 相比,FENO50 在区分哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和 ACO 方面可能具有更好的鉴别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Purpose: To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO200) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Methods: A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.

Results: The values of FENO200 in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO200 exhibited negative correlations with FEV1/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO200 and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO200 demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV1, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV1 in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO200. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV1 was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO50 discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.

Conclusion: In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO200 has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO200 levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO200 and CANO, FENO50 may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus). Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period. Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO). Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction. Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1