农业自杀的保护因素:全球范围审查。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500
Nathan Dawes, Richard C Franklin
{"title":"农业自杀的保护因素:全球范围审查。","authors":"Nathan Dawes, Richard C Franklin","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Each year, over 700,000 people die by suicide worldwide, and far more attempt and are impacted by the outcome. Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in which to work; it is also exposed to a lot of external stressors, such as climatic conditions, market forces (both input and output) and government regulation, as well as internal such as employment and of staff, multiple skills required and isolation. These stressors contribute to the higher rate of farm suicide cases. While there is growing evidence of the protective circumstances (factors) that protect against suicide and suicidality, more needs to be done in the agricultural sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review global literature and consolidate the current knowledge regarding protective factors against suicide and suicidality in agricultural communities and elucidate the implications of these findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc). A range of databases was searched for the terms \"suicide*\" or \"suicidal behavior\", \"suicide attempt\", or \"suicidal ideation\", or \"suicidality\", and \"farm*\" or 'agricultural worker*' or 'rancher*' and 'protective factors' or protect\". Paper included had to be peer reviewed in English, include people living, working in or with agriculture or lived in an agricultural area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the study criteria, predominately (72%) from the United States of America and Australia. Four (29%) articles discussed individual coping mechanisms and self-reliance as protective factors against suicide and suicidality, while six (43%) described the influence of social support and perceived sense of belonging on suicide risk. Five (36%) papers examined the association between health-promoting and suicide-prevention initiatives as protective factors in agricultural communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited, however, growing literature about protective factors for the prevention of suicide in agriculture; however, it is skewed to high-income countries. This review demonstrates a link between the development of individual coping skills as a protective factor against suicide in agricultural communities, with a primary focus on farming occupations within this setting. Social support was found to help reduce suicide risk by increasing a sense of belonging. These need to be exploited to drive down suicide rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Dawes, Richard C Franklin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Each year, over 700,000 people die by suicide worldwide, and far more attempt and are impacted by the outcome. Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in which to work; it is also exposed to a lot of external stressors, such as climatic conditions, market forces (both input and output) and government regulation, as well as internal such as employment and of staff, multiple skills required and isolation. These stressors contribute to the higher rate of farm suicide cases. While there is growing evidence of the protective circumstances (factors) that protect against suicide and suicidality, more needs to be done in the agricultural sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review global literature and consolidate the current knowledge regarding protective factors against suicide and suicidality in agricultural communities and elucidate the implications of these findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc). A range of databases was searched for the terms \\\"suicide*\\\" or \\\"suicidal behavior\\\", \\\"suicide attempt\\\", or \\\"suicidal ideation\\\", or \\\"suicidality\\\", and \\\"farm*\\\" or 'agricultural worker*' or 'rancher*' and 'protective factors' or protect\\\". Paper included had to be peer reviewed in English, include people living, working in or with agriculture or lived in an agricultural area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the study criteria, predominately (72%) from the United States of America and Australia. Four (29%) articles discussed individual coping mechanisms and self-reliance as protective factors against suicide and suicidality, while six (43%) described the influence of social support and perceived sense of belonging on suicide risk. Five (36%) papers examined the association between health-promoting and suicide-prevention initiatives as protective factors in agricultural communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited, however, growing literature about protective factors for the prevention of suicide in agriculture; however, it is skewed to high-income countries. This review demonstrates a link between the development of individual coping skills as a protective factor against suicide in agricultural communities, with a primary focus on farming occupations within this setting. Social support was found to help reduce suicide risk by increasing a sense of belonging. These need to be exploited to drive down suicide rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:每年,全世界有 70 多万人死于自杀,还有更多的人试图自杀并因此受到影响。农业是最危险的行业之一;它还面临着许多外部压力,如气候条件、市场力量(包括投入和产出)和政府监管,以及内部压力,如员工的就业、所需的多种技能和与世隔绝。这些压力因素导致农场自杀率较高。虽然越来越多的证据表明,保护性环境(因素)可防止自杀和自杀倾向,但在农业部门还需要做更多的工作:综述全球文献,整合有关农业社区自杀和自杀倾向保护因素的现有知识,并阐明这些发现的意义:方法:按照系统性范围界定综述首选报告项目(PRISMA-Sc)进行系统性范围界定综述。以 "自杀*"或 "自杀行为"、"自杀未遂 "或 "自杀意念 "或 "自杀倾向"、"农场*"或 "农业工人*"或 "牧场主*"以及 "保护因素 "或 "保护 "为关键词,对一系列数据库进行了检索。收录的论文必须是经同行评审的英文论文,论文中必须包括在农业领域生活、工作或与农业相关的人员,或居住在农业地区的人员:有 14 项研究符合研究标准,主要(72%)来自美国和澳大利亚。四篇(29%)文章讨论了个人应对机制和自立是自杀和自杀倾向的保护因素,六篇(43%)文章描述了社会支持和归属感对自杀风险的影响。五篇(36%)文章研究了促进健康和预防自杀的措施作为农业社区保护因素之间的关联:有关预防农业自杀的保护性因素的文献有限,但在不断增加;不过,这些文献主要集中在高收入国家。本综述表明,个人应对技能的发展是农业社区预防自杀的保护因素,这两者之间存在联系,主要关注的是农业环境中的农业职业。研究发现,社会支持有助于通过增强归属感来降低自杀风险。需要利用这些因素来降低自杀率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review.

Introduction: Each year, over 700,000 people die by suicide worldwide, and far more attempt and are impacted by the outcome. Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in which to work; it is also exposed to a lot of external stressors, such as climatic conditions, market forces (both input and output) and government regulation, as well as internal such as employment and of staff, multiple skills required and isolation. These stressors contribute to the higher rate of farm suicide cases. While there is growing evidence of the protective circumstances (factors) that protect against suicide and suicidality, more needs to be done in the agricultural sector.

Objective: To review global literature and consolidate the current knowledge regarding protective factors against suicide and suicidality in agricultural communities and elucidate the implications of these findings.

Method: A systematic scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc). A range of databases was searched for the terms "suicide*" or "suicidal behavior", "suicide attempt", or "suicidal ideation", or "suicidality", and "farm*" or 'agricultural worker*' or 'rancher*' and 'protective factors' or protect". Paper included had to be peer reviewed in English, include people living, working in or with agriculture or lived in an agricultural area.

Results: Fourteen studies met the study criteria, predominately (72%) from the United States of America and Australia. Four (29%) articles discussed individual coping mechanisms and self-reliance as protective factors against suicide and suicidality, while six (43%) described the influence of social support and perceived sense of belonging on suicide risk. Five (36%) papers examined the association between health-promoting and suicide-prevention initiatives as protective factors in agricultural communities.

Conclusion: There is limited, however, growing literature about protective factors for the prevention of suicide in agriculture; however, it is skewed to high-income countries. This review demonstrates a link between the development of individual coping skills as a protective factor against suicide in agricultural communities, with a primary focus on farming occupations within this setting. Social support was found to help reduce suicide risk by increasing a sense of belonging. These need to be exploited to drive down suicide rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Safety at Sea: A Call to Action for Small-Scale Fishing Communities in Developing Countries. The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review. Electrical Hazards on Australian Farms: A Rapid Review of Electrical Perceptions in Agriculture. Promoting Workplace Health, Safety, and Well-Being Among Essential Agricultural Workers Through Vaccine-Preventable Infectious Diseases Training in the Rio Grande Valley. Tensile Force Limits of the Sheep Spine: Comparison to Forces Required to Extricate Grain Entrapped Victims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1