无信号交叉口安全评估的新方法:将空间指标纳入异质交通条件下的碾压后时间分析。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2416485
George Kennedy Lyngdoh, Suprava Jena
{"title":"无信号交叉口安全评估的新方法:将空间指标纳入异质交通条件下的碾压后时间分析。","authors":"George Kennedy Lyngdoh, Suprava Jena","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2416485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the safety risks at unsignalized intersections becomes increasingly complex amid conditions of dense traffic flow, a heterogeneous mix of vehicles, nonadherence to lane demarcations, and reactive driving techniques. Understanding driver behavior under such varying circumstances is crucial for accurately assessing the potential hazards present at these intersections. The study aims to assess the safety of unsignalized intersections by incorporating both spatial and temporal variables under heterogeneous conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study presents a new safety indicator, dynamic postencroachment time (DPET), formulated to encapsulate both the spatial and temporal variables of heterogeneous traffic. Six unsignalized intersections were selected as the study areas in Assam, India, to assess the new indicator for merging and crossing conflicts. A videographic survey of the intersections was done to obtain vehicles' trajectory data and capture their conflict behaviors based on their position, speed, and steering angle. The peak over threshold (POT) approach of extreme value theory (EVT) was used to examine the feasibility of the indicator, and the methodology was validated using 4 years of crash data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result showed that a common threshold of 0.7 s from the POT approach is sufficient to identify severe conflicts. Furthermore, the threshold level yielded a shape parameter greater than -0.5, affirming that the maximum likelihood estimates retain the standard asymptotic attributes associated with EVT. The DPET approach estimated more crashes than observed fatal crashes, reflecting its ability to capture extreme events at a lower threshold. In comparison, the traditional PET approach estimated fewer crashes due to higher values influenced by evasive actions. Graphical analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the observed crash data over 4 years and the estimated crashes derived from the EVT models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating spatial variables in PET analysis provides a more robust measure for conflict analysis and assessment of potential traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections. The subsequent validation of the model with actual crash data highlights its practical applicability in enhancing road safety. The findings from the study provide a promising direction for future research and the potential for widespread implementation in traffic management systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach for safety assessment at unsignalized intersections: Integrating spatial metrics into postencroachment time analysis under heterogeneous traffic conditions.\",\"authors\":\"George Kennedy Lyngdoh, Suprava Jena\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2024.2416485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the safety risks at unsignalized intersections becomes increasingly complex amid conditions of dense traffic flow, a heterogeneous mix of vehicles, nonadherence to lane demarcations, and reactive driving techniques. Understanding driver behavior under such varying circumstances is crucial for accurately assessing the potential hazards present at these intersections. The study aims to assess the safety of unsignalized intersections by incorporating both spatial and temporal variables under heterogeneous conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study presents a new safety indicator, dynamic postencroachment time (DPET), formulated to encapsulate both the spatial and temporal variables of heterogeneous traffic. Six unsignalized intersections were selected as the study areas in Assam, India, to assess the new indicator for merging and crossing conflicts. A videographic survey of the intersections was done to obtain vehicles' trajectory data and capture their conflict behaviors based on their position, speed, and steering angle. The peak over threshold (POT) approach of extreme value theory (EVT) was used to examine the feasibility of the indicator, and the methodology was validated using 4 years of crash data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result showed that a common threshold of 0.7 s from the POT approach is sufficient to identify severe conflicts. Furthermore, the threshold level yielded a shape parameter greater than -0.5, affirming that the maximum likelihood estimates retain the standard asymptotic attributes associated with EVT. The DPET approach estimated more crashes than observed fatal crashes, reflecting its ability to capture extreme events at a lower threshold. In comparison, the traditional PET approach estimated fewer crashes due to higher values influenced by evasive actions. Graphical analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the observed crash data over 4 years and the estimated crashes derived from the EVT models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating spatial variables in PET analysis provides a more robust measure for conflict analysis and assessment of potential traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections. The subsequent validation of the model with actual crash data highlights its practical applicability in enhancing road safety. The findings from the study provide a promising direction for future research and the potential for widespread implementation in traffic management systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2416485\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2416485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在车流密集、车辆混杂、不遵守车道分界线和反应性驾驶技术等条件下,评估无信号交叉路口的安全风险变得越来越复杂。要准确评估这些交叉路口存在的潜在危险,了解驾驶员在这种不同情况下的行为至关重要。本研究旨在通过结合异质条件下的空间和时间变量,评估无信号交叉口的安全性:本研究提出了一种新的安全指标--动态 "碾压后时间"(DPET),该指标的制定包含了异构交通的空间和时间变量。研究选取了印度阿萨姆邦的六个无信号交叉路口作为研究区域,以评估并线和交叉冲突的新指标。对交叉口进行了视频调查,以获取车辆的轨迹数据,并根据车辆的位置、速度和转向角捕捉其冲突行为。使用极值理论(EVT)的峰值超过阈值(POT)方法来检验指标的可行性,并使用 4 年的碰撞数据对该方法进行了验证:结果表明,POT 方法中 0.7 秒的普通阈值足以识别严重冲突。此外,该阈值水平产生的形状参数大于-0.5,证明最大似然估计值保留了与 EVT 相关的标准渐近属性。DPET 方法估计的撞车次数多于观察到的致命撞车次数,这反映出它能够在较低的阈值下捕捉极端事件。相比之下,传统的 PET 方法估计的碰撞次数较少,原因是受规避行动影响的数值较高。图形分析表明,4 年中观察到的碰撞事故数据与 EVT 模型得出的碰撞事故估计值之间存在很强的相关性:结论:在 PET 分析中整合空间变量为冲突分析和评估无信号交叉口潜在的交通冲突提供了更可靠的措施。随后利用实际碰撞数据对模型进行的验证突出表明了该模型在加强道路安全方面的实用性。研究结果为今后的研究指明了方向,并有可能在交通管理系统中广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel approach for safety assessment at unsignalized intersections: Integrating spatial metrics into postencroachment time analysis under heterogeneous traffic conditions.

Objective: Evaluating the safety risks at unsignalized intersections becomes increasingly complex amid conditions of dense traffic flow, a heterogeneous mix of vehicles, nonadherence to lane demarcations, and reactive driving techniques. Understanding driver behavior under such varying circumstances is crucial for accurately assessing the potential hazards present at these intersections. The study aims to assess the safety of unsignalized intersections by incorporating both spatial and temporal variables under heterogeneous conditions.

Methods: The study presents a new safety indicator, dynamic postencroachment time (DPET), formulated to encapsulate both the spatial and temporal variables of heterogeneous traffic. Six unsignalized intersections were selected as the study areas in Assam, India, to assess the new indicator for merging and crossing conflicts. A videographic survey of the intersections was done to obtain vehicles' trajectory data and capture their conflict behaviors based on their position, speed, and steering angle. The peak over threshold (POT) approach of extreme value theory (EVT) was used to examine the feasibility of the indicator, and the methodology was validated using 4 years of crash data.

Results: The result showed that a common threshold of 0.7 s from the POT approach is sufficient to identify severe conflicts. Furthermore, the threshold level yielded a shape parameter greater than -0.5, affirming that the maximum likelihood estimates retain the standard asymptotic attributes associated with EVT. The DPET approach estimated more crashes than observed fatal crashes, reflecting its ability to capture extreme events at a lower threshold. In comparison, the traditional PET approach estimated fewer crashes due to higher values influenced by evasive actions. Graphical analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the observed crash data over 4 years and the estimated crashes derived from the EVT models.

Conclusions: Integrating spatial variables in PET analysis provides a more robust measure for conflict analysis and assessment of potential traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections. The subsequent validation of the model with actual crash data highlights its practical applicability in enhancing road safety. The findings from the study provide a promising direction for future research and the potential for widespread implementation in traffic management systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger. The comparison of STOP-BANG and no-apnea questionnaires in screening obstructive sleep apnea among commercial drivers. A novel approach for safety assessment at unsignalized intersections: Integrating spatial metrics into postencroachment time analysis under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Alcohol perceptions and driving decisions among adolescents: Exploring the role of peer and parental influences in Virginia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1