分析 ICIs 对肺癌患者的治疗效果和影响因素。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03767-z
Jun Luo, Li Li, HongGui Wang, Xian Zhang, FangTing He, Meng Shi, Xin Zhang, Rui Tang, Yong Bao
{"title":"分析 ICIs 对肺癌患者的治疗效果和影响因素。","authors":"Jun Luo, Li Li, HongGui Wang, Xian Zhang, FangTing He, Meng Shi, Xin Zhang, Rui Tang, Yong Bao","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03767-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the efficacy and risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred lung cancer patients who were treated in our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects and divided into chemotherapy group (n = 50) and ICIs group (n = 50), in which the chemotherapy group was given the combined treatment of vincristine and cisplatin (NP), while the ICIs group was given ICIs for treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions (hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia) of the two groups were compared, and fasting venous blood was collected. The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA199) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. According to the therapeutic effect, 100 patients with lung cancer were divided into complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) group (n = 52) and stable (SD) + progressive (PD) group (n = 48). The clinical data and pathologic data of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of objective effective rate (ORR) in chemotherapy group and ICIs group were 36.00% and 68.00% respectively, and the level of ORR in ICIs group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum CEA and CA199 levels between the two groups before operation (P > 0.05). Three months after operation, the serum CEA and CA199 levels in ICIs group were significantly lower than those in chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions of hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia in chemotherapy group and ICIs group during treatment were all grade 1-2, and the incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in sex, age, anatomic position, pathologic type, smoking history and differentiation between the two groups (P > 0.05). In SD + PD group, the preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage IV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 183 U/L, and tumor volume ≥ 120m<sup>3</sup> were significantly higher than those in CR + PR group, and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 41.8 and the proportion of ICIs were significantly lower than those in CR + PR group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm and LDH ≥ 183 U/L were risk factors for poor lung cancer outcome, and PNI ≥ 41.8 and ICIs treatment were protective factors for poor lung cancer outcome (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICIs is effective in the treatment of lung cancer, which can obviously reduce the tumor load and has high safety. In addition, the maximum tumor diameter and LDH are risk factors that affect the poor curative effect of lung cancer. High PNI level and ICIs treatment are helpful to improve the effect of lung cancer, and early monitoring is helpful to guide the treatment plan and evaluate the treatment effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of therapeutic effects and influencing factors of ICIs in lung-cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Luo, Li Li, HongGui Wang, Xian Zhang, FangTing He, Meng Shi, Xin Zhang, Rui Tang, Yong Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03767-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the efficacy and risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred lung cancer patients who were treated in our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects and divided into chemotherapy group (n = 50) and ICIs group (n = 50), in which the chemotherapy group was given the combined treatment of vincristine and cisplatin (NP), while the ICIs group was given ICIs for treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions (hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia) of the two groups were compared, and fasting venous blood was collected. The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA199) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. According to the therapeutic effect, 100 patients with lung cancer were divided into complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) group (n = 52) and stable (SD) + progressive (PD) group (n = 48). The clinical data and pathologic data of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of objective effective rate (ORR) in chemotherapy group and ICIs group were 36.00% and 68.00% respectively, and the level of ORR in ICIs group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum CEA and CA199 levels between the two groups before operation (P > 0.05). Three months after operation, the serum CEA and CA199 levels in ICIs group were significantly lower than those in chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions of hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia in chemotherapy group and ICIs group during treatment were all grade 1-2, and the incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in sex, age, anatomic position, pathologic type, smoking history and differentiation between the two groups (P > 0.05). In SD + PD group, the preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage IV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 183 U/L, and tumor volume ≥ 120m<sup>3</sup> were significantly higher than those in CR + PR group, and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 41.8 and the proportion of ICIs were significantly lower than those in CR + PR group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm and LDH ≥ 183 U/L were risk factors for poor lung cancer outcome, and PNI ≥ 41.8 and ICIs treatment were protective factors for poor lung cancer outcome (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICIs is effective in the treatment of lung cancer, which can obviously reduce the tumor load and has high safety. In addition, the maximum tumor diameter and LDH are risk factors that affect the poor curative effect of lung cancer. High PNI level and ICIs treatment are helpful to improve the effect of lung cancer, and early monitoring is helpful to guide the treatment plan and evaluate the treatment effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03767-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03767-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本回顾性研究旨在分析免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在肺癌患者中的疗效和风险因素:选取2021年5月至2023年5月在我院接受治疗的100例肺癌患者作为研究对象,分为化疗组(n=50)和ICIs组(n=50),其中化疗组给予长春新碱和顺铂(NP)联合治疗,ICIs组给予ICIs治疗。比较两组的疗效和不良反应(高甘油三酯血症、贫血、高血压和低蛋白血症),并采集空腹静脉血。比较两组患者治疗前后癌胚抗原(CEA)和癌抗原 199(CA199)的水平。根据疗效将 100 例肺癌患者分为完全缓解(CR)+部分缓解(PR)组(52 例)和稳定(SD)+进展(PD)组(48 例)。比较两组的临床数据和病理数据:化疗组和 ICIs 组的客观有效率(ORR)分别为 36.00% 和 68.00%,ICIs 组的 ORR 水平明显高于化疗组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。术后三个月,ICIs 组血清 CEA 和 CA199 水平明显低于化疗组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组患者在性别、年龄、解剖位置、病理类型、吸烟史和分化程度等方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。SD+PD组术前肿瘤最大直径>4 cm、肿瘤结节转移(TNM)分期Ⅳ期、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)≥183 U/L、肿瘤体积≥120 m3明显高于CR+PR组,预后营养指数(PNI)≥41.8 和 ICIs 比例明显低于 CR + PR 组,差异有统计学意义(P 4 cm 和 LDH≥ 183 U/L是肺癌不良预后的危险因素,PNI≥41.8 和 ICIs 治疗是肺癌不良预后的保护因素(P 结论:ICIs 是治疗肺癌的有效方法:ICIs 治疗肺癌效果显著,能明显减轻肿瘤负荷,安全性高。此外,肿瘤最大直径和 LDH 是影响肺癌不良预后的危险因素。高 PNI 水平和 ICIs 治疗有助于提高肺癌的疗效,早期监测有助于指导治疗方案和评估疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of therapeutic effects and influencing factors of ICIs in lung-cancer patients.

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the efficacy and risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.

Methods: One hundred lung cancer patients who were treated in our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects and divided into chemotherapy group (n = 50) and ICIs group (n = 50), in which the chemotherapy group was given the combined treatment of vincristine and cisplatin (NP), while the ICIs group was given ICIs for treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions (hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia) of the two groups were compared, and fasting venous blood was collected. The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA199) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. According to the therapeutic effect, 100 patients with lung cancer were divided into complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) group (n = 52) and stable (SD) + progressive (PD) group (n = 48). The clinical data and pathologic data of the two groups were compared.

Results: The rates of objective effective rate (ORR) in chemotherapy group and ICIs group were 36.00% and 68.00% respectively, and the level of ORR in ICIs group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum CEA and CA199 levels between the two groups before operation (P > 0.05). Three months after operation, the serum CEA and CA199 levels in ICIs group were significantly lower than those in chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions of hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia in chemotherapy group and ICIs group during treatment were all grade 1-2, and the incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in sex, age, anatomic position, pathologic type, smoking history and differentiation between the two groups (P > 0.05). In SD + PD group, the preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage IV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 183 U/L, and tumor volume ≥ 120m3 were significantly higher than those in CR + PR group, and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 41.8 and the proportion of ICIs were significantly lower than those in CR + PR group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm and LDH ≥ 183 U/L were risk factors for poor lung cancer outcome, and PNI ≥ 41.8 and ICIs treatment were protective factors for poor lung cancer outcome (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: ICIs is effective in the treatment of lung cancer, which can obviously reduce the tumor load and has high safety. In addition, the maximum tumor diameter and LDH are risk factors that affect the poor curative effect of lung cancer. High PNI level and ICIs treatment are helpful to improve the effect of lung cancer, and early monitoring is helpful to guide the treatment plan and evaluate the treatment effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Multi‑index comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and response mechanism of immunotherapy in non‑small cell lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognostic value of MAPK12 protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Identification of SMC2 and SMC4 as prognostic markers in breast cancer through bioinformatics analysis. ITGB4 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis. The value of combined MRI, enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrence and metastasis after surgery for ovarian cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1